Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/201488 |
Resumo: | In studies of avian diversity, many different methods have been applied. Since methodological approaches may affect research results, the choice of a given methodology must be consistent with the scientific objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate how different methodologies with their intrinsic limitations help detect and monitor birds to evaluate how they complement each other in the survey of species. Three different assessment methods, mist nets, point counts, and autonomous acoustic recordings were used to serve this purpose in a study of different Pantanal habitats, such as savannas and forests. The point counts detected more species (126 species) than the two other methods autonomous acoustic recordings (113 species) and mist nets (79 species). We observed significant differences in the number of species detected by mist nets and the other two methods. Each survey method identified exclusive species. When comparing habitats, all three methods showed significant differences in bird species composition. Savannas were richer in bird species than forests, and replacement was the main driver responsible for the differences in beta diversity between the habitats. The three methodologies, when applied together, proved to be complementary in avian species detection. |
id |
USP-69_fc96447852f02039ab9511bb3253fb95 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/201488 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-69 |
network_name_str |
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the differencePoint countsAutonomous acoustic recordingMist netsBeta diversityIn studies of avian diversity, many different methods have been applied. Since methodological approaches may affect research results, the choice of a given methodology must be consistent with the scientific objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate how different methodologies with their intrinsic limitations help detect and monitor birds to evaluate how they complement each other in the survey of species. Three different assessment methods, mist nets, point counts, and autonomous acoustic recordings were used to serve this purpose in a study of different Pantanal habitats, such as savannas and forests. The point counts detected more species (126 species) than the two other methods autonomous acoustic recordings (113 species) and mist nets (79 species). We observed significant differences in the number of species detected by mist nets and the other two methods. Each survey method identified exclusive species. When comparing habitats, all three methods showed significant differences in bird species composition. Savannas were richer in bird species than forests, and replacement was the main driver responsible for the differences in beta diversity between the habitats. The three methodologies, when applied together, proved to be complementary in avian species detection.Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP).2023-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/20148810.11606/1807-0205/2023.63.015Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 63 (2023); e202363015Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 63 (2023); e202363015Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; v. 63 (2023); e2023630151807-02050031-1049reponame:Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/201488/195430Copyright (c) 2023 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDeus, Filipe Ferreira deSchuchmann, Karl-L.Tissiani, Ana Silvia de OliveiraNogueira, WagnerMarques, Marinêz Isaac2023-07-05T12:40:10Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/201488Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/pazPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/oaipublicacaomz@usp.br ; einicker@usp.br1807-02050031-1049opendoar:2023-07-05T12:40:10Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
title |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
spellingShingle |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference Deus, Filipe Ferreira de Point counts Autonomous acoustic recording Mist nets Beta diversity |
title_short |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
title_full |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
title_fullStr |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
title_sort |
Avian biodiversity assessment studies in a Neotropical wetland – the combination of sampling methods makes the difference |
author |
Deus, Filipe Ferreira de |
author_facet |
Deus, Filipe Ferreira de Schuchmann, Karl-L. Tissiani, Ana Silvia de Oliveira Nogueira, Wagner Marques, Marinêz Isaac |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schuchmann, Karl-L. Tissiani, Ana Silvia de Oliveira Nogueira, Wagner Marques, Marinêz Isaac |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Deus, Filipe Ferreira de Schuchmann, Karl-L. Tissiani, Ana Silvia de Oliveira Nogueira, Wagner Marques, Marinêz Isaac |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Point counts Autonomous acoustic recording Mist nets Beta diversity |
topic |
Point counts Autonomous acoustic recording Mist nets Beta diversity |
description |
In studies of avian diversity, many different methods have been applied. Since methodological approaches may affect research results, the choice of a given methodology must be consistent with the scientific objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate how different methodologies with their intrinsic limitations help detect and monitor birds to evaluate how they complement each other in the survey of species. Three different assessment methods, mist nets, point counts, and autonomous acoustic recordings were used to serve this purpose in a study of different Pantanal habitats, such as savannas and forests. The point counts detected more species (126 species) than the two other methods autonomous acoustic recordings (113 species) and mist nets (79 species). We observed significant differences in the number of species detected by mist nets and the other two methods. Each survey method identified exclusive species. When comparing habitats, all three methods showed significant differences in bird species composition. Savannas were richer in bird species than forests, and replacement was the main driver responsible for the differences in beta diversity between the habitats. The three methodologies, when applied together, proved to be complementary in avian species detection. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/201488 10.11606/1807-0205/2023.63.015 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/201488 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/1807-0205/2023.63.015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paz/article/view/201488/195430 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP). |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP). |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 63 (2023); e202363015 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; Vol. 63 (2023); e202363015 Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia; v. 63 (2023); e202363015 1807-0205 0031-1049 reponame:Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) |
collection |
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacaomz@usp.br ; einicker@usp.br |
_version_ |
1797051522378366976 |