Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Matrizes (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135 |
Resumo: | This paper intends to analyze the discursive disputes that permeate the comparative debate between films and TV series in the contemporary cultural criticism. We take from the arguments of Argentinean filmmaker Lucrecia Martel against TV series in order to understand, diachronically, the historical tensions between cinema and television and its perpetuity in the current scenario. To do so, we come up here with three dominant axis in the comparative evaluation: espectatorial experience, style and narrative. With this, we aim to discuss the arguments of an aprioristic superiority of film over TV series, without forgetting the distinctive nature of this ongoing symbolic dispute. |
id |
USP-70_bc66fb2ef75c6e3b4ca79d4ede100085 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/183135 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-70 |
network_name_str |
Matrizes (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV seriesO passo atrás de Lucrecia: disputas discursivas entre filmes e sériesSerial fictionFilmCinema and televisionDiscursive disputesCultural criticismFicção seriadaFilmeCinema e televisãoDisputas discursivasCrítica culturalThis paper intends to analyze the discursive disputes that permeate the comparative debate between films and TV series in the contemporary cultural criticism. We take from the arguments of Argentinean filmmaker Lucrecia Martel against TV series in order to understand, diachronically, the historical tensions between cinema and television and its perpetuity in the current scenario. To do so, we come up here with three dominant axis in the comparative evaluation: espectatorial experience, style and narrative. With this, we aim to discuss the arguments of an aprioristic superiority of film over TV series, without forgetting the distinctive nature of this ongoing symbolic dispute.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar as disputas discursivas que permeiam o debate comparativo entre filmes e séries no contexto da crítica cultural contemporânea. Partimos dos argumentos da diretora Lucrecia Martel contra as séries televisivas para compreender, diacronicamente, as tensões históricas entre cinema e televisão e a sua perenidade no cenário atual. Para isso, proporemos aqui três eixos dominantes na avaliação comparativa: experiência espectatorial, estilo e narrativa. Com isso, vamos problematizar os argumentos da superioridade apriorística do filme em relação às séries, sem perder do horizonte a natureza distintiva da disputa simbólica em curso.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Comunicação2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/18313510.11606/issn.1982-8160.v15i2p33-53MATRIZes; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2021); 33-53MATRIZes; v. 15 n. 2 (2021); 33-53MATRIZes; Vol. 15 No 2 (2021); 33-53MATRIZes; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021); 33-53MATRIZes; V. 15 N. 2 (2021); 33-531982-81601982-2073reponame:Matrizes (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135/175626https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135/175627https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marcel Vieira BarretoSilva, Marcel Vieira Barreto2023-05-18T17:13:50Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/183135Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizesPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/oaimatrizes@usp.br1982-81601982-2073opendoar:2023-05-18T17:13:50Matrizes (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series O passo atrás de Lucrecia: disputas discursivas entre filmes e séries |
title |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series |
spellingShingle |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series Silva, Marcel Vieira Barreto Serial fiction Film Cinema and television Discursive disputes Cultural criticism Ficção seriada Filme Cinema e televisão Disputas discursivas Crítica cultural |
title_short |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series |
title_full |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series |
title_fullStr |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series |
title_sort |
Lucrecia’s step back: discursive disputes between films and TV series |
author |
Silva, Marcel Vieira Barreto |
author_facet |
Silva, Marcel Vieira Barreto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Marcel Vieira Barreto Silva, Marcel Vieira Barreto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Serial fiction Film Cinema and television Discursive disputes Cultural criticism Ficção seriada Filme Cinema e televisão Disputas discursivas Crítica cultural |
topic |
Serial fiction Film Cinema and television Discursive disputes Cultural criticism Ficção seriada Filme Cinema e televisão Disputas discursivas Crítica cultural |
description |
This paper intends to analyze the discursive disputes that permeate the comparative debate between films and TV series in the contemporary cultural criticism. We take from the arguments of Argentinean filmmaker Lucrecia Martel against TV series in order to understand, diachronically, the historical tensions between cinema and television and its perpetuity in the current scenario. To do so, we come up here with three dominant axis in the comparative evaluation: espectatorial experience, style and narrative. With this, we aim to discuss the arguments of an aprioristic superiority of film over TV series, without forgetting the distinctive nature of this ongoing symbolic dispute. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135 10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v15i2p33-53 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v15i2p33-53 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135/175626 https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/view/183135/175627 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Comunicação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Comunicação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MATRIZes; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2021); 33-53 MATRIZes; v. 15 n. 2 (2021); 33-53 MATRIZes; Vol. 15 No 2 (2021); 33-53 MATRIZes; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021); 33-53 MATRIZes; V. 15 N. 2 (2021); 33-53 1982-8160 1982-2073 reponame:Matrizes (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Matrizes (Online) |
collection |
Matrizes (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Matrizes (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
matrizes@usp.br |
_version_ |
1797051312779558912 |