Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Uajará Pessoa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Brito, Mozar José de, Ribeiro, Lívia Maria de Pádua, Lopes, Fernanda Tarabal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301
Resumo: This paper deals with Brazilian empirical research published in journals between 2000 and mid-2015 that used, as a source of data, the Management Reports (MRs) released by publicly-traded companies together with their financial statements. MRs differ from each other, both in form as well as in substance, and due to this as well as to their other characteristics, they prove attractive for academic studies interested in official company discourse, more so because they involve documents that are public and retrievable over time, covering a substantial range of typically larger companies from different economic sectors. Driven by these characteristics, the goal of this study was to understand the way the academic world understands and uses the MR. The paper favored an interpretivist viewpoint, but used the triangulation allowed by the use of qualitative (content analysis) and quantitative (statistical, sociometric, and bibliometric analyses) methods. It was concluded that, for the core group of experts who dealt with the document, the MR is biased, incomplete, questionable, unclear, laborious, uncertain, but also useful - in the absence of another -, comprehensive, available, and retrievable over time. And it lends itself to the interest of company directors by increasing their value and at the same time legitimizing their companies, incorporating into discourse the use of contemporary management practices, consistent with the expectations of stakeholders. Finally, it suggests the possibility, unexplored in the articles analyzed, of employing the MR to study the dynamics of the institutionalization of administrative practices among companies in the country.
id USP-7_50d21523baf3e534bcfb2ff0691fc078
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/117301
network_acronym_str USP-7
network_name_str Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report Metainterpretação: Quinze Anos de Pesquisa com o Relatório da Administração This paper deals with Brazilian empirical research published in journals between 2000 and mid-2015 that used, as a source of data, the Management Reports (MRs) released by publicly-traded companies together with their financial statements. MRs differ from each other, both in form as well as in substance, and due to this as well as to their other characteristics, they prove attractive for academic studies interested in official company discourse, more so because they involve documents that are public and retrievable over time, covering a substantial range of typically larger companies from different economic sectors. Driven by these characteristics, the goal of this study was to understand the way the academic world understands and uses the MR. The paper favored an interpretivist viewpoint, but used the triangulation allowed by the use of qualitative (content analysis) and quantitative (statistical, sociometric, and bibliometric analyses) methods. It was concluded that, for the core group of experts who dealt with the document, the MR is biased, incomplete, questionable, unclear, laborious, uncertain, but also useful - in the absence of another -, comprehensive, available, and retrievable over time. And it lends itself to the interest of company directors by increasing their value and at the same time legitimizing their companies, incorporating into discourse the use of contemporary management practices, consistent with the expectations of stakeholders. Finally, it suggests the possibility, unexplored in the articles analyzed, of employing the MR to study the dynamics of the institutionalization of administrative practices among companies in the country. Este trabalho lida com as investigações empíricas brasileiras publicadas em periódicos entre 2000 e meados de 2015 e que utilizaram - como fonte de dados - o Relatório da Administração (RA) divulgado pelas empresas de capital aberto junto com as demonstrações financeiras. Os RA são diversos entre si, tanto na substância quanto na forma, constituindo-se, por essa e por suas outras características, em atrativo para pesquisas acadêmicas interessadas no discurso oficial das empresas, ainda mais sendo aqueles documentos públicos e recuperáveis ao longo do tempo, cobrindo uma gama considerável de empresas, tipicamente, de maior porte, de diversos setores econômicos. Compelido por tais atributos, o objetivo deste estudo foi apreender a forma com que a academia científica entende e utiliza o RA. O trabalho privilegiou a ótica interpretativista, mas recorreu à triangulação permitida pelo uso de métodos qualitativos (análise de conteúdo) e quantitativos (análises estatísticas, sociométricas e bibliométricas). Concluiu-se que, para o grupo central de especialistas que lidaram com o documento, o RA é enviesado, incompleto, contestável, dúbio, trabalhoso, incerto, mas também útil - na falta de outro -, abrangente, disponível e recuperável ao longo do tempo; e se presta ao interesse dos diretores de empresas em, simultaneamente, valorizar-se e legitimar as suas companhias, incorporando em discurso o emprego de práticas contemporâneas de gestão, coerentes com as expectativas daqueles destinatários dos RA. Ao final, sugere-se a possibilidade, não explorada nos artigos analisados, de empregar o RA para acompanhar a dinâmica da institucionalização de práticas administrativas entre as empresas do país. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/11730110.1590/1808-057x201602260Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; v. 27 n. 71 (2016); 217-231Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 27 No. 71 (2016); 217-231Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 27 Núm. 71 (2016); 217-2311808-057X1519-7077reponame:Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301/114935https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301/114936Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Contabilidade & Finançasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Uajará PessoaBrito, Mozar José deRibeiro, Lívia Maria de PáduaLopes, Fernanda Tarabal2016-07-05T13:21:14Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/117301Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprecont@usp.br||recont@usp.br1808-057X1519-7077opendoar:2016-07-05T13:21:14Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
Metainterpretação: Quinze Anos de Pesquisa com o Relatório da Administração
title Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
spellingShingle Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
Araújo, Uajará Pessoa
title_short Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
title_full Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
title_fullStr Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
title_sort Meta-Interpretation: Fifteen Years of Research with the Management Report
author Araújo, Uajará Pessoa
author_facet Araújo, Uajará Pessoa
Brito, Mozar José de
Ribeiro, Lívia Maria de Pádua
Lopes, Fernanda Tarabal
author_role author
author2 Brito, Mozar José de
Ribeiro, Lívia Maria de Pádua
Lopes, Fernanda Tarabal
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, Uajará Pessoa
Brito, Mozar José de
Ribeiro, Lívia Maria de Pádua
Lopes, Fernanda Tarabal
description This paper deals with Brazilian empirical research published in journals between 2000 and mid-2015 that used, as a source of data, the Management Reports (MRs) released by publicly-traded companies together with their financial statements. MRs differ from each other, both in form as well as in substance, and due to this as well as to their other characteristics, they prove attractive for academic studies interested in official company discourse, more so because they involve documents that are public and retrievable over time, covering a substantial range of typically larger companies from different economic sectors. Driven by these characteristics, the goal of this study was to understand the way the academic world understands and uses the MR. The paper favored an interpretivist viewpoint, but used the triangulation allowed by the use of qualitative (content analysis) and quantitative (statistical, sociometric, and bibliometric analyses) methods. It was concluded that, for the core group of experts who dealt with the document, the MR is biased, incomplete, questionable, unclear, laborious, uncertain, but also useful - in the absence of another -, comprehensive, available, and retrievable over time. And it lends itself to the interest of company directors by increasing their value and at the same time legitimizing their companies, incorporating into discourse the use of contemporary management practices, consistent with the expectations of stakeholders. Finally, it suggests the possibility, unexplored in the articles analyzed, of employing the MR to study the dynamics of the institutionalization of administrative practices among companies in the country.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301
10.1590/1808-057x201602260
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1808-057x201602260
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301/114935
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rcf/article/view/117301/114936
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; v. 27 n. 71 (2016); 217-231
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 27 No. 71 (2016); 217-231
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças; Vol. 27 Núm. 71 (2016); 217-231
1808-057X
1519-7077
reponame:Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
collection Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv recont@usp.br||recont@usp.br
_version_ 1787713777262657536