Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759 |
Resumo: | The assessment of inspiratory muscles through the inspiratory muscle endurance test (IME), defined as the ability to support this task over time, currently presents wide range of instruments and procedures for its measurement. This study aimed to identify the different equipment, procedures and assessments of IME tests among Brazilian physical therapists. It is a cross-sectional study carried out through a questionnaire sent individually by electronic mail to each participant. One hundred and thirteen physical therapists from different regions of the country, many practicing in the clinic and in the teaching field (52.1%), said they measured IME a few times (48.7%). The aneroid manovacuometer was used by 42.5% of the professionals. The nose clip and the hard plastic or paper tubular incentive spirometer were the most used accessories during the test, corresponding to 51.8% and 33%, respectively. The maximum voluntary ventilation test was used to assess the inspiratory endurance, reported by 23% of the respondents. The constant load test for endurance assessment was adopted by 51.2% of the physical therapists, and 54.9% associated verbal commands with the demonstration for the test application. The interpretation of the measured values was made with reference values by 25.7% of respondents. We identified that Brazilian physical therapists interviewed did not show the same conduct for IME tests. However, the equipment, procedures and assessment form are used based on the guidelines on the subject and according to the availability of resources of the service. |
id |
USP-9_004613f7dadc10c769414ef01363a6af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/152759 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-9 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance testsIdentificação de equipamentos e procedimentos utilizados por fisioterapeutas brasileiros para testes de endurance muscular inspiratóriaIdentificación de equipos y procedimientos utilizados por fisioterapeutas brasileños para pruebas de endurance muscular inspiratoriaTestes de Função RespiratóriaResistência Muscular RespiratóriaEquipamentos para DiagnósticoFisioterapiaPruebas de Función RespiratoriaResistencia Muscular RespiratoriaEquipo para DiagnósticoFisioterapiaRespiratory Functional TestsRespiratory Muscle EnduranceDiagnostic EquipmentPhysical TherapyThe assessment of inspiratory muscles through the inspiratory muscle endurance test (IME), defined as the ability to support this task over time, currently presents wide range of instruments and procedures for its measurement. This study aimed to identify the different equipment, procedures and assessments of IME tests among Brazilian physical therapists. It is a cross-sectional study carried out through a questionnaire sent individually by electronic mail to each participant. One hundred and thirteen physical therapists from different regions of the country, many practicing in the clinic and in the teaching field (52.1%), said they measured IME a few times (48.7%). The aneroid manovacuometer was used by 42.5% of the professionals. The nose clip and the hard plastic or paper tubular incentive spirometer were the most used accessories during the test, corresponding to 51.8% and 33%, respectively. The maximum voluntary ventilation test was used to assess the inspiratory endurance, reported by 23% of the respondents. The constant load test for endurance assessment was adopted by 51.2% of the physical therapists, and 54.9% associated verbal commands with the demonstration for the test application. The interpretation of the measured values was made with reference values by 25.7% of respondents. We identified that Brazilian physical therapists interviewed did not show the same conduct for IME tests. However, the equipment, procedures and assessment form are used based on the guidelines on the subject and according to the availability of resources of the service.A avaliação da função dos músculos inspiratórios por meio do teste de endurance muscular inspiratória (EMI), definida como a capacidade de sustentação dessa tarefa ao longo do tempo, atualmente apresenta ampla variedade de instrumentos e procedimentos para sua mensuração. Este estudo teve como objetivo identificar os diferentes equipamentos, procedimentos e forma de avaliação dos testes de EMI entre fisioterapeutas brasileiros. É um estudo transversal realizado por meio de questionário enviado por correio eletrônico individualmente a cada participante. Cento e treze fisioterapeutas de diferentes regiões do país, grande parte com atuação conjunta na clínica e na docência (52,1%), responderam realizar poucas vezes a medida de EMI (48,7%). O manovacuômetro aneroide foi o aparelho mais utilizado por 42,5% dos profissionais. O clipe nasal e o bocal tubular de plástico rígido ou papel foram os acessórios mais utilizados durante o teste, correspondendo a 51,8% e 33%, respectivamente. O teste de ventilação voluntária máxima foi o mais utilizado para avaliação da endurance inspiratória, relatado por 23% dos respondentes. O teste de carga constante para avaliação da endurance foi adotado por 51,2% dos fisioterapeutas, sendo que 54,9% associaram comandos verbais à demonstração para explicação do teste. A interpretação dos valores aferidos era feita através de valores de referência por 25,7% dos entrevistados. Identificou-se que os fisioterapeutas brasileiros entrevistados não apresentaram a mesma conduta para os testes de EMI. No entanto os equipamentos, procedimentos e a forma de avaliação são utilizados com base nas diretrizes sobre o tema e de acordo com a disponibilidade de recursos do serviço.La evaluación de la función de los músculos inspiratorios a través del entrenamiento muscular inspiratorio (EMI), definida como la capacidad de sustentación de esta tarea a lo largo del tiempo, actualmente presenta una amplia variedad de instrumentos y procedimientos para su medición. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los diferentes equipos, procedimientos y forma de evaluación de las pruebas de EMI entre fisioterapeutas brasileños. Es un estudio transversal realizado por medio de un cuestionario enviado por correo electrónico a cada participante. Ciento trece fisioterapeutas de diferentes regiones del país, que en gran parte actúan a la vez en la clínica y en la enseñanza (52,1%), dijeron realizar pocas veces la medida de EMI (48,7%). El manovacuómetro aneroide fue el aparato más utilizado por el 42,5% de los profesionales. El clip nasal y la boquilla tubular de plástico rígido o papel fueron los accesorios más utilizados durante la prueba, correspondiendo al 51,8% y al 33%, respectivamente. La prueba de ventilación voluntaria máxima fue la más utilizada para la evaluación de la resistencia respiratoria, reportada por el 23% de los entrevistados. La prueba de carga constante para la evaluación de la resistencia se adoptó por el 51,2% de los fisioterapeutas, siendo que el 54,9% asoció comandos verbales a la demostración para la explicación de la prueba. La interpretación de los valores evaluados se hacía a través de valores de referencia por el 25,7% de los entrevistados. Se identificó que los fisioterapeutas brasileños entrevistados no presentaron la misma conducta para las pruebas de EMI. Sin embargo, los equipos, procedimientos y la forma de evaluación se utilizan con base en las directrices sobre el tema y de acuerdo con la disponibilidad de recursos del servicio.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2018-09-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/15275910.1590/1809-2950/17014925032018Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2018); 269-277Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2018); 269-277Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 25 n. 3 (2018); 269-2772316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759/149269https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759/149290Copyright (c) 2018 Fisioterapia e Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Sabrina CostaRibeiro, Simone Nascimento SantosOliveira, Natália Freitas deMiranda, Cristiana Meurer deBritto, Raquel RodriguesMontemezzo, Dayane2023-05-26T14:00:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/152759Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2023-05-26T14:00:51Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests Identificação de equipamentos e procedimentos utilizados por fisioterapeutas brasileiros para testes de endurance muscular inspiratória Identificación de equipos y procedimientos utilizados por fisioterapeutas brasileños para pruebas de endurance muscular inspiratoria |
title |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests |
spellingShingle |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests Lima, Sabrina Costa Testes de Função Respiratória Resistência Muscular Respiratória Equipamentos para Diagnóstico Fisioterapia Pruebas de Función Respiratoria Resistencia Muscular Respiratoria Equipo para Diagnóstico Fisioterapia Respiratory Functional Tests Respiratory Muscle Endurance Diagnostic Equipment Physical Therapy |
title_short |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests |
title_full |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests |
title_fullStr |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests |
title_sort |
Identification of equipment and procedures used by Brazilian physical therapists for inspiratory muscle endurance tests |
author |
Lima, Sabrina Costa |
author_facet |
Lima, Sabrina Costa Ribeiro, Simone Nascimento Santos Oliveira, Natália Freitas de Miranda, Cristiana Meurer de Britto, Raquel Rodrigues Montemezzo, Dayane |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Simone Nascimento Santos Oliveira, Natália Freitas de Miranda, Cristiana Meurer de Britto, Raquel Rodrigues Montemezzo, Dayane |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Sabrina Costa Ribeiro, Simone Nascimento Santos Oliveira, Natália Freitas de Miranda, Cristiana Meurer de Britto, Raquel Rodrigues Montemezzo, Dayane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Testes de Função Respiratória Resistência Muscular Respiratória Equipamentos para Diagnóstico Fisioterapia Pruebas de Función Respiratoria Resistencia Muscular Respiratoria Equipo para Diagnóstico Fisioterapia Respiratory Functional Tests Respiratory Muscle Endurance Diagnostic Equipment Physical Therapy |
topic |
Testes de Função Respiratória Resistência Muscular Respiratória Equipamentos para Diagnóstico Fisioterapia Pruebas de Función Respiratoria Resistencia Muscular Respiratoria Equipo para Diagnóstico Fisioterapia Respiratory Functional Tests Respiratory Muscle Endurance Diagnostic Equipment Physical Therapy |
description |
The assessment of inspiratory muscles through the inspiratory muscle endurance test (IME), defined as the ability to support this task over time, currently presents wide range of instruments and procedures for its measurement. This study aimed to identify the different equipment, procedures and assessments of IME tests among Brazilian physical therapists. It is a cross-sectional study carried out through a questionnaire sent individually by electronic mail to each participant. One hundred and thirteen physical therapists from different regions of the country, many practicing in the clinic and in the teaching field (52.1%), said they measured IME a few times (48.7%). The aneroid manovacuometer was used by 42.5% of the professionals. The nose clip and the hard plastic or paper tubular incentive spirometer were the most used accessories during the test, corresponding to 51.8% and 33%, respectively. The maximum voluntary ventilation test was used to assess the inspiratory endurance, reported by 23% of the respondents. The constant load test for endurance assessment was adopted by 51.2% of the physical therapists, and 54.9% associated verbal commands with the demonstration for the test application. The interpretation of the measured values was made with reference values by 25.7% of respondents. We identified that Brazilian physical therapists interviewed did not show the same conduct for IME tests. However, the equipment, procedures and assessment form are used based on the guidelines on the subject and according to the availability of resources of the service. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759 10.1590/1809-2950/17014925032018 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-2950/17014925032018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759/149269 https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152759/149290 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2018); 269-277 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2018); 269-277 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 25 n. 3 (2018); 269-277 2316-9117 1809-2950 reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
collection |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revfisio@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713739508678656 |