Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221 |
Resumo: | This study’s objective was to employ Regulation-17 (NR-17) of Brazil’s Ministry of Labor to describe the work environment of health professionals of a public hospital, while also evaluating fatigue and estimating their risk of exposure to it, as well as the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort. This was a cross-sectional study consisting of two phases: 1) Observation of the work environment by means of the NR-17, adapted as a checklist; 2) Evaluation of discomfort and fatigue by means of questionnaires. Data were analyzed descriptively. The association between fatigue and discomfort was assessed using the chi-square test, while the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare age, service time at the institution and weekly working hours across the stratified groups (with fatigue/without fatigue, with discomfort/without discomfort). Twenty sectors were evaluated. The sector with the highest frequency of inadequacy was Pharmacy (83% inadequate items), while the Adult ICU was the most adequate (only 24% inadequate items). There was a high prevalence of discomfort, especially in the spine. Fatigue was present in more than 70% of professionals. Older individuals presented more complaints of discomfort. This study demonstrates a high frequency of ergonomic inadequacies in the hospital’s work environment, mainly in the Pharmacy and Ambulatory sectors. The high prevalence of spine discomfort and fatigue emphasizes the relevance of preventive actions in the hospital environment. |
id |
USP-9_34aa258890bf78b98e2a59456f2a83ec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/157221 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-9 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional studyLos profesionales de la salud que actúan en ambiente hospitalario tienen alta prevalencia de fatiga y dorsalgia: un estudio transversalProfissionais da saúde que atuam em ambiente hospitalar têm alta prevalência de fadiga e dorsalgia: estudo transversalErgonomicsOccupational HealthOccupational RisksErgonomíaSalud LaboralRiesgos LaboralesErgonomiaSaúde do TrabalhadorRiscos OcupacionaisThis study’s objective was to employ Regulation-17 (NR-17) of Brazil’s Ministry of Labor to describe the work environment of health professionals of a public hospital, while also evaluating fatigue and estimating their risk of exposure to it, as well as the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort. This was a cross-sectional study consisting of two phases: 1) Observation of the work environment by means of the NR-17, adapted as a checklist; 2) Evaluation of discomfort and fatigue by means of questionnaires. Data were analyzed descriptively. The association between fatigue and discomfort was assessed using the chi-square test, while the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare age, service time at the institution and weekly working hours across the stratified groups (with fatigue/without fatigue, with discomfort/without discomfort). Twenty sectors were evaluated. The sector with the highest frequency of inadequacy was Pharmacy (83% inadequate items), while the Adult ICU was the most adequate (only 24% inadequate items). There was a high prevalence of discomfort, especially in the spine. Fatigue was present in more than 70% of professionals. Older individuals presented more complaints of discomfort. This study demonstrates a high frequency of ergonomic inadequacies in the hospital’s work environment, mainly in the Pharmacy and Ambulatory sectors. The high prevalence of spine discomfort and fatigue emphasizes the relevance of preventive actions in the hospital environment.El objetivo fue caracterizar el ambiente laboral por medio de la Norma Reguladora n.º 17 del Ministerio de Trabajo (NR-17); evaluar la fatiga residual y también estimar el riesgo de exposición y la presencia de incomodidad musculoesquelética de profesionales de la salud que actúan en un hospital público. Este estudio transversal consta de dos fases: (1) la observación del entorno de trabajo por la NR-17, lista de control adaptada; y (2) la evaluación de la incomodidad y la fatiga por medio de cuestionarios. Los datos se analizaron de forma descriptiva. La asociación entre fatiga y molestia se verificó mediante el test chicuadrado, y la prueba de Mann-Whitney se utilizó para comparar la edad, el tiempo de institución y la carga horaria (horas/ semana) entre los grupos estratificados (con fatiga/sin fatiga y con incomodidad/sin molestias). Se evaluaron 20 sectores, de los cuales la Farmacia tuvo la mayor frecuencia de inadecuación (83%) y la UCI Adulto se mostró la más adecuada (un 24% de ítems inadecuados). Se observó una alta prevalencia de incomodidad, principalmente en la columna. La fatiga estaba presente en más del 70% de los profesionales. Los individuos de mayor edad presentaron más quejas de malestar. El presente estudio demostró una alta frecuencia de inadecuaciones ergonómicas en el ambiente laboral hospitalario, principalmente en el sector de la Farmacia y del Ambulatorio. La alta prevalencia de incomodidad en la columna y la fatiga demuestran la relevancia de acciones preventivas en el ambiente hospitalario.O objetivo foi caracterizar o ambiente de trabalho por meio da Norma Regulamentadora 17 do Ministério do Trabalho (NR-17); avaliar a fadiga residual e estimar o risco da sua exposição e a presença de desconforto musculoesquelético de profissionais da saúde que atuam em um hospital público. Trata-se de estudo transversal composto por duas etapas: (1) observação do ambiente de trabalho por meio da NR-17, adaptada em checklist; e (2) avaliação do desconforto e fadiga por meio de questionários. Os dados foram analisados descritivamente. A associação entre fadiga e desconforto foi verificada pelo qui-quadrado e o teste de Mann-Whitney comparou a idade, tempo de instituição e carga horária (horas/semana) entre os grupos estratificados (com fadiga/sem fadiga e com desconforto/sem desconforto). Foram avaliados 20 setores, dos quais a Farmácia teve a maior frequência de inadequação (83%) e a UTI Adulto mostrouse o mais adequado (24% de itens inadequados). Verificouse uma alta prevalência de desconforto, principalmente na coluna. A fadiga estava presente em mais de 70% dos profissionais. Indivíduos com maior idade apresentaram mais queixas de desconforto. O presente estudo demonstrou uma alta frequência de inadequações ergonômicas em ambiente de trabalho hospitalar, principalmente no setor da Farmácia e Ambulatório. A alta prevalência de desconforto na coluna e a fadiga demonstram a relevância de ações preventivas no ambiente hospitalar.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2019-02-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/15722110.1590/1809-2950/18032926012019Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2019); 91-100Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2019); 91-100Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 26 n. 1 (2019); 91-1002316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221/152616https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221/152617Copyright (c) 2019 Fisioterapia e Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTottoli, Caroline RibeiroToledo, Aline Martins deSilva, Natasha Cyrino eAraújo, Wildo Navegantes deSouza, Renata da NóbregaCarregaro, Rodrigo Luiz2023-05-26T13:29:47Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/157221Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2023-05-26T13:29:47Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study Los profesionales de la salud que actúan en ambiente hospitalario tienen alta prevalencia de fatiga y dorsalgia: un estudio transversal Profissionais da saúde que atuam em ambiente hospitalar têm alta prevalência de fadiga e dorsalgia: estudo transversal |
title |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study |
spellingShingle |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study Tottoli, Caroline Ribeiro Ergonomics Occupational Health Occupational Risks Ergonomía Salud Laboral Riesgos Laborales Ergonomia Saúde do Trabalhador Riscos Ocupacionais |
title_short |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
Health professionals working in a hospital environment have a high prevalence of fatigue and back pain: a cross-sectional study |
author |
Tottoli, Caroline Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Tottoli, Caroline Ribeiro Toledo, Aline Martins de Silva, Natasha Cyrino e Araújo, Wildo Navegantes de Souza, Renata da Nóbrega Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Toledo, Aline Martins de Silva, Natasha Cyrino e Araújo, Wildo Navegantes de Souza, Renata da Nóbrega Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tottoli, Caroline Ribeiro Toledo, Aline Martins de Silva, Natasha Cyrino e Araújo, Wildo Navegantes de Souza, Renata da Nóbrega Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ergonomics Occupational Health Occupational Risks Ergonomía Salud Laboral Riesgos Laborales Ergonomia Saúde do Trabalhador Riscos Ocupacionais |
topic |
Ergonomics Occupational Health Occupational Risks Ergonomía Salud Laboral Riesgos Laborales Ergonomia Saúde do Trabalhador Riscos Ocupacionais |
description |
This study’s objective was to employ Regulation-17 (NR-17) of Brazil’s Ministry of Labor to describe the work environment of health professionals of a public hospital, while also evaluating fatigue and estimating their risk of exposure to it, as well as the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort. This was a cross-sectional study consisting of two phases: 1) Observation of the work environment by means of the NR-17, adapted as a checklist; 2) Evaluation of discomfort and fatigue by means of questionnaires. Data were analyzed descriptively. The association between fatigue and discomfort was assessed using the chi-square test, while the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare age, service time at the institution and weekly working hours across the stratified groups (with fatigue/without fatigue, with discomfort/without discomfort). Twenty sectors were evaluated. The sector with the highest frequency of inadequacy was Pharmacy (83% inadequate items), while the Adult ICU was the most adequate (only 24% inadequate items). There was a high prevalence of discomfort, especially in the spine. Fatigue was present in more than 70% of professionals. Older individuals presented more complaints of discomfort. This study demonstrates a high frequency of ergonomic inadequacies in the hospital’s work environment, mainly in the Pharmacy and Ambulatory sectors. The high prevalence of spine discomfort and fatigue emphasizes the relevance of preventive actions in the hospital environment. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221 10.1590/1809-2950/18032926012019 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-2950/18032926012019 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221/152616 https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/157221/152617 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2019); 91-100 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2019); 91-100 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 26 n. 1 (2019); 91-100 2316-9117 1809-2950 reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
collection |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revfisio@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713739637653504 |