Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073 |
Resumo: | The association of tasks (dual-task) has functional importance in daily activities; people usually have to learn new tasks. It is unclear whether tasks should be trained isolated or associated. This experiment aimed at verifying whether the best dual-task performance occurs after training isolated or associated tasks. Twenty volunteers underwent initial assessment, training, and final assessment; ten trained associated tasks (AT) and the others trained tasks separately (IT). The motor task consisted of alternating steps between the ground and a platform. The visual task measured the ability to name two visual stimuli displayed on a computer screen (bus or truck). The number of step alternations per second in the absence and presence of the visual task, and the number of errors in the visual task in the absence and presence of the motor task, were counted and statistically analysed. The AT group showed both motor (initial 1.10 alternations/s, final 1.25 alternations/s; p=0.028) and visual (initial 9.3 errors, final 6.9 errors; p=0.039) improvement in performance. The same did not occur to the IT group: motor improvement did not reach significance level, probably due to the higher variability in the number of step alternations per second during training, and no visual improvement was shown (p=0.844). It may thus be said that the kind of training interfered on performance. The best performance occurred after dual-task training. |
id |
USP-9_6d48bd66b39cb178e8f5f8f379ac2e35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/12073 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-9 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? Os componentes motor e visual de uma tarefa-dupla devem ser associados ou isolados durante o treinamento? Análise e desempenho de tarefasAtençãoAtividade motoraPercepção visualAttentionMotor activityTask performance and analysisVisual perception The association of tasks (dual-task) has functional importance in daily activities; people usually have to learn new tasks. It is unclear whether tasks should be trained isolated or associated. This experiment aimed at verifying whether the best dual-task performance occurs after training isolated or associated tasks. Twenty volunteers underwent initial assessment, training, and final assessment; ten trained associated tasks (AT) and the others trained tasks separately (IT). The motor task consisted of alternating steps between the ground and a platform. The visual task measured the ability to name two visual stimuli displayed on a computer screen (bus or truck). The number of step alternations per second in the absence and presence of the visual task, and the number of errors in the visual task in the absence and presence of the motor task, were counted and statistically analysed. The AT group showed both motor (initial 1.10 alternations/s, final 1.25 alternations/s; p=0.028) and visual (initial 9.3 errors, final 6.9 errors; p=0.039) improvement in performance. The same did not occur to the IT group: motor improvement did not reach significance level, probably due to the higher variability in the number of step alternations per second during training, and no visual improvement was shown (p=0.844). It may thus be said that the kind of training interfered on performance. The best performance occurred after dual-task training. As atividades diárias requerem o desempenho simultâneo de tarefas (tarefa-dupla), não estando claro se seu treino deve ser realizado com tarefas isoladas ou associadas. Este estudo visou verificar se a aquisição de uma tarefa-dupla ocorre por meio do treinamento de tarefas isoladas ou associadas. Vinte voluntárias foram submetidas a avaliação inicial, treinamento e avaliação final. Dez treinaram as tarefas associadas (TA) e as demais, isoladas (TI). A tarefa motora consistia na alternância de passos do chão a uma plataforma. A tarefa visual consistia na nomeação de dois estímulos (ônibus ou caminhão), um no centro e outro na periferia da tela do computador. O número de passos por segundo na ausência e na presença da tarefa visual, e o número de erros na tarefa visual na ausência e na presença da tarefa motora, foram contados e comparados estatisticamente. O grupo TA apresentou melhora tanto no desempenho motor (inicial 1,10 alternâncias/s, final 1,25 alternâncias/s, p=0,028), quanto no desempenho visual (inicial 9,3 erros, final: 6,9 erros, p=0,039). O mesmo não ocorreu com o grupo TI: a melhora motora não atingiu nível significativo, provavelmente devido à maior variabilidade no número de alternâncias de passo por segundo durante o treinamento, e não houve melhora visual significativa (p=0,844). Portanto, o tipo de treinamento interferiu no desempenho. O melhor desempenho ocorreu após o treinamento da tarefa-dupla. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/1207310.1590/S1809-29502008000100006Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008); 33-39 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 33-39 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 15 n. 1 (2008); 33-39 2316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073/13850Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVoos, Mariana CallilPinheiro, Gisele BragaCicca, Luciana OlcerenkoLázaro, AndréiaValle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro doPiemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel2012-05-13T15:53:43Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/12073Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2012-05-13T15:53:43Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? Os componentes motor e visual de uma tarefa-dupla devem ser associados ou isolados durante o treinamento? |
title |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? |
spellingShingle |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? Voos, Mariana Callil Análise e desempenho de tarefas Atenção Atividade motora Percepção visual Attention Motor activity Task performance and analysis Visual perception |
title_short |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? |
title_full |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? |
title_fullStr |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? |
title_sort |
Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? |
author |
Voos, Mariana Callil |
author_facet |
Voos, Mariana Callil Pinheiro, Gisele Braga Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko Lázaro, Andréia Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinheiro, Gisele Braga Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko Lázaro, Andréia Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Voos, Mariana Callil Pinheiro, Gisele Braga Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko Lázaro, Andréia Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise e desempenho de tarefas Atenção Atividade motora Percepção visual Attention Motor activity Task performance and analysis Visual perception |
topic |
Análise e desempenho de tarefas Atenção Atividade motora Percepção visual Attention Motor activity Task performance and analysis Visual perception |
description |
The association of tasks (dual-task) has functional importance in daily activities; people usually have to learn new tasks. It is unclear whether tasks should be trained isolated or associated. This experiment aimed at verifying whether the best dual-task performance occurs after training isolated or associated tasks. Twenty volunteers underwent initial assessment, training, and final assessment; ten trained associated tasks (AT) and the others trained tasks separately (IT). The motor task consisted of alternating steps between the ground and a platform. The visual task measured the ability to name two visual stimuli displayed on a computer screen (bus or truck). The number of step alternations per second in the absence and presence of the visual task, and the number of errors in the visual task in the absence and presence of the motor task, were counted and statistically analysed. The AT group showed both motor (initial 1.10 alternations/s, final 1.25 alternations/s; p=0.028) and visual (initial 9.3 errors, final 6.9 errors; p=0.039) improvement in performance. The same did not occur to the IT group: motor improvement did not reach significance level, probably due to the higher variability in the number of step alternations per second during training, and no visual improvement was shown (p=0.844). It may thus be said that the kind of training interfered on performance. The best performance occurred after dual-task training. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073 10.1590/S1809-29502008000100006 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1809-29502008000100006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073/13850 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008); 33-39 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 33-39 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 15 n. 1 (2008); 33-39 2316-9117 1809-2950 reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
collection |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revfisio@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713733469929472 |