Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Voos, Mariana Callil
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Pinheiro, Gisele Braga, Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko, Lázaro, Andréia, Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do, Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073
Resumo: The association of tasks (dual-task) has functional importance in daily activities; people usually have to learn new tasks. It is unclear whether tasks should be trained isolated or associated. This experiment aimed at verifying whether the best dual-task performance occurs after training isolated or associated tasks. Twenty volunteers underwent initial assessment, training, and final assessment; ten trained associated tasks (AT) and the others trained tasks separately (IT). The motor task consisted of alternating steps between the ground and a platform. The visual task measured the ability to name two visual stimuli displayed on a computer screen (bus or truck). The number of step alternations per second in the absence and presence of the visual task, and the number of errors in the visual task in the absence and presence of the motor task, were counted and statistically analysed. The AT group showed both motor (initial 1.10 alternations/s, final 1.25 alternations/s; p=0.028) and visual (initial 9.3 errors, final 6.9 errors; p=0.039) improvement in performance. The same did not occur to the IT group: motor improvement did not reach significance level, probably due to the higher variability in the number of step alternations per second during training, and no visual improvement was shown (p=0.844). It may thus be said that the kind of training interfered on performance. The best performance occurred after dual-task training.
id USP-9_6d48bd66b39cb178e8f5f8f379ac2e35
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/12073
network_acronym_str USP-9
network_name_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training? Os componentes motor e visual de uma tarefa-dupla devem ser associados ou isolados durante o treinamento? Análise e desempenho de tarefasAtençãoAtividade motoraPercepção visualAttentionMotor activityTask performance and analysisVisual perception The association of tasks (dual-task) has functional importance in daily activities; people usually have to learn new tasks. It is unclear whether tasks should be trained isolated or associated. This experiment aimed at verifying whether the best dual-task performance occurs after training isolated or associated tasks. Twenty volunteers underwent initial assessment, training, and final assessment; ten trained associated tasks (AT) and the others trained tasks separately (IT). The motor task consisted of alternating steps between the ground and a platform. The visual task measured the ability to name two visual stimuli displayed on a computer screen (bus or truck). The number of step alternations per second in the absence and presence of the visual task, and the number of errors in the visual task in the absence and presence of the motor task, were counted and statistically analysed. The AT group showed both motor (initial 1.10 alternations/s, final 1.25 alternations/s; p=0.028) and visual (initial 9.3 errors, final 6.9 errors; p=0.039) improvement in performance. The same did not occur to the IT group: motor improvement did not reach significance level, probably due to the higher variability in the number of step alternations per second during training, and no visual improvement was shown (p=0.844). It may thus be said that the kind of training interfered on performance. The best performance occurred after dual-task training. As atividades diárias requerem o desempenho simultâneo de tarefas (tarefa-dupla), não estando claro se seu treino deve ser realizado com tarefas isoladas ou associadas. Este estudo visou verificar se a aquisição de uma tarefa-dupla ocorre por meio do treinamento de tarefas isoladas ou associadas. Vinte voluntárias foram submetidas a avaliação inicial, treinamento e avaliação final. Dez treinaram as tarefas associadas (TA) e as demais, isoladas (TI). A tarefa motora consistia na alternância de passos do chão a uma plataforma. A tarefa visual consistia na nomeação de dois estímulos (ônibus ou caminhão), um no centro e outro na periferia da tela do computador. O número de passos por segundo na ausência e na presença da tarefa visual, e o número de erros na tarefa visual na ausência e na presença da tarefa motora, foram contados e comparados estatisticamente. O grupo TA apresentou melhora tanto no desempenho motor (inicial 1,10 alternâncias/s, final 1,25 alternâncias/s, p=0,028), quanto no desempenho visual (inicial 9,3 erros, final: 6,9 erros, p=0,039). O mesmo não ocorreu com o grupo TI: a melhora motora não atingiu nível significativo, provavelmente devido à maior variabilidade no número de alternâncias de passo por segundo durante o treinamento, e não houve melhora visual significativa (p=0,844). Portanto, o tipo de treinamento interferiu no desempenho. O melhor desempenho ocorreu após o treinamento da tarefa-dupla. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/1207310.1590/S1809-29502008000100006Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008); 33-39 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 33-39 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 15 n. 1 (2008); 33-39 2316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073/13850Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVoos, Mariana CallilPinheiro, Gisele BragaCicca, Luciana OlcerenkoLázaro, AndréiaValle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro doPiemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel2012-05-13T15:53:43Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/12073Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2012-05-13T15:53:43Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
Os componentes motor e visual de uma tarefa-dupla devem ser associados ou isolados durante o treinamento?
title Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
spellingShingle Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
Voos, Mariana Callil
Análise e desempenho de tarefas
Atenção
Atividade motora
Percepção visual
Attention
Motor activity
Task performance and analysis
Visual perception
title_short Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
title_full Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
title_fullStr Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
title_full_unstemmed Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
title_sort Should motor and visual components of a dual-task be associated or separated during training?
author Voos, Mariana Callil
author_facet Voos, Mariana Callil
Pinheiro, Gisele Braga
Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko
Lázaro, Andréia
Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do
Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel
author_role author
author2 Pinheiro, Gisele Braga
Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko
Lázaro, Andréia
Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do
Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Voos, Mariana Callil
Pinheiro, Gisele Braga
Cicca, Luciana Olcerenko
Lázaro, Andréia
Valle, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro do
Piemonte, Maria Elisa Pimentel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Análise e desempenho de tarefas
Atenção
Atividade motora
Percepção visual
Attention
Motor activity
Task performance and analysis
Visual perception
topic Análise e desempenho de tarefas
Atenção
Atividade motora
Percepção visual
Attention
Motor activity
Task performance and analysis
Visual perception
description The association of tasks (dual-task) has functional importance in daily activities; people usually have to learn new tasks. It is unclear whether tasks should be trained isolated or associated. This experiment aimed at verifying whether the best dual-task performance occurs after training isolated or associated tasks. Twenty volunteers underwent initial assessment, training, and final assessment; ten trained associated tasks (AT) and the others trained tasks separately (IT). The motor task consisted of alternating steps between the ground and a platform. The visual task measured the ability to name two visual stimuli displayed on a computer screen (bus or truck). The number of step alternations per second in the absence and presence of the visual task, and the number of errors in the visual task in the absence and presence of the motor task, were counted and statistically analysed. The AT group showed both motor (initial 1.10 alternations/s, final 1.25 alternations/s; p=0.028) and visual (initial 9.3 errors, final 6.9 errors; p=0.039) improvement in performance. The same did not occur to the IT group: motor improvement did not reach significance level, probably due to the higher variability in the number of step alternations per second during training, and no visual improvement was shown (p=0.844). It may thus be said that the kind of training interfered on performance. The best performance occurred after dual-task training.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073
10.1590/S1809-29502008000100006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1809-29502008000100006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/12073/13850
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008); 33-39
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 33-39
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 15 n. 1 (2008); 33-39
2316-9117
1809-2950
reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
collection Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revfisio@usp.br
_version_ 1787713733469929472