Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
Texto Completo: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/59/59139/tde-29062023-140152/ |
Resumo: | Soil properties have long been overlooked in studies that attempt to disentangle the potential influence of multiple drivers on vegetation properties. This lack of a systematic approach to how soils influence vegetation is markedly evident in studies focusing on seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs). An intensive soil and vegetation sampling in 29 study plots across the seasonal dry Caatinga domain (that is, a geographic comparison approach) allowed evaluating variations in several soil properties among three geological affiliations [that is, sedimentary (SSED), metamorphic (SMET) and karst (SKAR)], and investigating to which extent these properties relate to variations in above-ground woody biomass (AGBW), communityweighted mean traits and functional diversity indexes. The soil properties varied systemically among geological affiliations, with some properties, however, showing substantially higher variation than others. For example, weathering-associated metrics such as effective cation exchange capacity (IE) and total reserve bases (ΣRB) were found to decrease following SKAR > SMET > SSED, while total soil phosphorus concentrations ([P]T) were relatively higher at the SKAR sites. Moreover, the distribution of main soil exchange cations (that is, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and Al) in the soil sortive complex reflected the original soil parent materials, with soil base cations being generally higher at the SKAR and SMET sites. In contrast, exchangeable aluminium levels were generally higher at the SSED sites. Nitrogen dynamics, addressed by soil δ15N values, was found to be primarily modulated by climatic forces [that is, aridity index (AI) and the seasonality of the precipitation (Ψ)]. However, a role for IE on soil δ15N values was also suggested, especially at the wetter sites. The AGBW was found to be influenced by both soil and climate. For instance, mean annual precipitation (PA) and soil fertility (represented by calcium) positively influenced AGBW levels. Furthermore, interactions between long-term climatic water deficit (CWD) and both [Ca]ex and the maximum plant-available soil water content (θP) suggest that AGBW in Caatinga is driven by complex interactions. Soil properties were also related to community functional properties, with all community-weighted mean maximum stem diameter (CWMdmax), community-weighted mean wood density (CWMwd), functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve), and functional divergence (FDiv) being influenced by soil properties. In that regard, an inverse relationship was found between soil base cations and CWMwd. In contrast, soil base cations had a positive influence on CWMdmax. Finally, several soil nutritional metrics positively influenced FRic, while only a few elements inversely influenced both FEve and FDiv metrics. These relationships are thought to reflect vegetation trade-offs between investment in secondary growth and water-economy strategies. Collectively, these results provide information on the multiple ways through which soils can affect vegetation structure and functioning. |
id |
USP_0e7916425f7d35d588d791af78b55e19 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-29062023-140152 |
network_acronym_str |
USP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository_id_str |
2721 |
spelling |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetationSolos e seus efeitos na vegetação da caatinga brasileiraδ15N do soloAbove-ground biomassAtributos funcionaisBiomassa acima do soloCaatingaCaatingaClimatic gradientsEdaphic gradientsFunctional traitsGradientes climáticosGradientes edáficosMateriais de origem do soloPedogênesePedogenesisSemiarid soilsSoil δ15NSoil parent materialsSoilsSolosSolos semiáridosSoil properties have long been overlooked in studies that attempt to disentangle the potential influence of multiple drivers on vegetation properties. This lack of a systematic approach to how soils influence vegetation is markedly evident in studies focusing on seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs). An intensive soil and vegetation sampling in 29 study plots across the seasonal dry Caatinga domain (that is, a geographic comparison approach) allowed evaluating variations in several soil properties among three geological affiliations [that is, sedimentary (SSED), metamorphic (SMET) and karst (SKAR)], and investigating to which extent these properties relate to variations in above-ground woody biomass (AGBW), communityweighted mean traits and functional diversity indexes. The soil properties varied systemically among geological affiliations, with some properties, however, showing substantially higher variation than others. For example, weathering-associated metrics such as effective cation exchange capacity (IE) and total reserve bases (ΣRB) were found to decrease following SKAR > SMET > SSED, while total soil phosphorus concentrations ([P]T) were relatively higher at the SKAR sites. Moreover, the distribution of main soil exchange cations (that is, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and Al) in the soil sortive complex reflected the original soil parent materials, with soil base cations being generally higher at the SKAR and SMET sites. In contrast, exchangeable aluminium levels were generally higher at the SSED sites. Nitrogen dynamics, addressed by soil δ15N values, was found to be primarily modulated by climatic forces [that is, aridity index (AI) and the seasonality of the precipitation (Ψ)]. However, a role for IE on soil δ15N values was also suggested, especially at the wetter sites. The AGBW was found to be influenced by both soil and climate. For instance, mean annual precipitation (PA) and soil fertility (represented by calcium) positively influenced AGBW levels. Furthermore, interactions between long-term climatic water deficit (CWD) and both [Ca]ex and the maximum plant-available soil water content (θP) suggest that AGBW in Caatinga is driven by complex interactions. Soil properties were also related to community functional properties, with all community-weighted mean maximum stem diameter (CWMdmax), community-weighted mean wood density (CWMwd), functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve), and functional divergence (FDiv) being influenced by soil properties. In that regard, an inverse relationship was found between soil base cations and CWMwd. In contrast, soil base cations had a positive influence on CWMdmax. Finally, several soil nutritional metrics positively influenced FRic, while only a few elements inversely influenced both FEve and FDiv metrics. These relationships are thought to reflect vegetation trade-offs between investment in secondary growth and water-economy strategies. Collectively, these results provide information on the multiple ways through which soils can affect vegetation structure and functioning.As propriedades do solo foram negligenciadas por muito tempo em estudos que tentam particionar a influência potencial de múltiplos fatores nas propriedades da vegetação. Essa falta de uma abordagem sistemática sobre como os solos influenciam a vegetação é bastante evidente em estudos com foco em florestas tropicais sazonalmente secas (FTSSs). Uma amostragem intensiva de solo e vegetação em 29 parcelas de estudo em todo o domínio da Caatinga sazonalmente seca (isto é, uma abordam de comparação geográfica) permitiu avaliar variações em várias propriedades do solo entre três afiliações geológicas [ou seja, sedimentar (SSED), metamórfica (SMET) e cárstica (SKAR)] e investigar até que ponto essas propriedades se relacionam com variações na biomassa lenhosa acima do solo (AGBW), atributos funcionais ponderados pela comunidade e índices de diversidade funcional. As propriedades do solo variaram sistemicamente entre as afiliações geológicas, com algumas propriedades, no entanto, exibindo variação substancialmente maior do que outras. Por exemplo, as métricas associadas ao intemperismo, como capacidade efetiva de troca de cátions (IE) e reserva total de bases (ΣRB), diminuíram de acordo com SKAR > SMET > SSED, enquanto as concentrações totais de fósforo no solo ([P]T) foram relativamente mais altas nas áreas SKAR. Além disso, a distribuição dos principais cátions trocáveis (ou seja, Ca, Mg, K, Na e Al) no complexo sortivo do solo refletiu seus respectivos materiais de origem, com teores de cátions básicos sendo geralmente maiores nas áreas SKAR e SMET. Em contraste, os níveis de alumínio trocável foram geralmente mais altos nas áreas SSED. A dinâmica do nitrogênio (N), abordada pelos valores de δ15N do solo, foi modulada principalmente por forças climáticas [isto é, índice de aridez (AI) e sazonalidade da precipitação (Ψ)]. No entanto, um papel para IE sobre os valores de δ15N do solo também foi sugerido, especialmente nos locais mais úmidos. A AGBW foi influenciada tanto pelo solo quanto pelo clima. Por exemplo, a precipitação média anual (PA) e a fertilidade do solo (representada por cálcio) influenciaram positivamente os valores de AGBW. Além disso, as interações entre o déficit hídrico climático de longo prazo (CWD) e tanto à [Ca]ex quanto o teor máximo de água disponível no solo (θP) sugerem que a AGBW na Caatinga é determinada por interações complexas. As propriedades do solo também foram relacionadas às propriedades funcionais da comunidade, com diâmetro máximo do fuste ponderado pela comunidade (CWMdmax), densidade da madeira ponderada pela comunidade (CWMwd), riqueza funcional (FRic), equitabilidade funcional (FEve) e divergência funcional (FDiv) sendo todos influenciadas pelas propriedades do solo. Nesse sentido, foi encontrada uma relação inversa entre cátions básicos do solo e CWMwd. Em contraste, os cátions básicos do solo influenciaram positivamente CWMdmax. Por fim, várias métricas nutricionais do solo influenciaram positivamente o índice FRic, enquanto apenas alguns elementos influenciaram inversamente os índices FEve e FDiv. Acredita-se que essas relações reflitam as compensações da vegetação entre o investimento no crescimento secundário e as estratégias de economia da água. Coletivamente, esses resultados fornecem informações sobre as múltiplas maneiras pelas quais os solos podem afetar a estrutura e o funcionamento da vegetação.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPDomingues, Tomas FerreiraLloyd, Jonathan JamesBrunello, Alexandre Tadeu2022-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/59/59139/tde-29062023-140152/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2023-10-09T18:12:47Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-29062023-140152Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212023-10-09T18:12:47Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation Solos e seus efeitos na vegetação da caatinga brasileira |
title |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation |
spellingShingle |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation Brunello, Alexandre Tadeu δ15N do solo Above-ground biomass Atributos funcionais Biomassa acima do solo Caatinga Caatinga Climatic gradients Edaphic gradients Functional traits Gradientes climáticos Gradientes edáficos Materiais de origem do solo Pedogênese Pedogenesis Semiarid soils Soil δ15N Soil parent materials Soils Solos Solos semiáridos |
title_short |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation |
title_full |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation |
title_fullStr |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation |
title_sort |
Soils and their effects on Brazilian Caatinga vegetation |
author |
Brunello, Alexandre Tadeu |
author_facet |
Brunello, Alexandre Tadeu |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Domingues, Tomas Ferreira Lloyd, Jonathan James |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brunello, Alexandre Tadeu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
δ15N do solo Above-ground biomass Atributos funcionais Biomassa acima do solo Caatinga Caatinga Climatic gradients Edaphic gradients Functional traits Gradientes climáticos Gradientes edáficos Materiais de origem do solo Pedogênese Pedogenesis Semiarid soils Soil δ15N Soil parent materials Soils Solos Solos semiáridos |
topic |
δ15N do solo Above-ground biomass Atributos funcionais Biomassa acima do solo Caatinga Caatinga Climatic gradients Edaphic gradients Functional traits Gradientes climáticos Gradientes edáficos Materiais de origem do solo Pedogênese Pedogenesis Semiarid soils Soil δ15N Soil parent materials Soils Solos Solos semiáridos |
description |
Soil properties have long been overlooked in studies that attempt to disentangle the potential influence of multiple drivers on vegetation properties. This lack of a systematic approach to how soils influence vegetation is markedly evident in studies focusing on seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs). An intensive soil and vegetation sampling in 29 study plots across the seasonal dry Caatinga domain (that is, a geographic comparison approach) allowed evaluating variations in several soil properties among three geological affiliations [that is, sedimentary (SSED), metamorphic (SMET) and karst (SKAR)], and investigating to which extent these properties relate to variations in above-ground woody biomass (AGBW), communityweighted mean traits and functional diversity indexes. The soil properties varied systemically among geological affiliations, with some properties, however, showing substantially higher variation than others. For example, weathering-associated metrics such as effective cation exchange capacity (IE) and total reserve bases (ΣRB) were found to decrease following SKAR > SMET > SSED, while total soil phosphorus concentrations ([P]T) were relatively higher at the SKAR sites. Moreover, the distribution of main soil exchange cations (that is, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and Al) in the soil sortive complex reflected the original soil parent materials, with soil base cations being generally higher at the SKAR and SMET sites. In contrast, exchangeable aluminium levels were generally higher at the SSED sites. Nitrogen dynamics, addressed by soil δ15N values, was found to be primarily modulated by climatic forces [that is, aridity index (AI) and the seasonality of the precipitation (Ψ)]. However, a role for IE on soil δ15N values was also suggested, especially at the wetter sites. The AGBW was found to be influenced by both soil and climate. For instance, mean annual precipitation (PA) and soil fertility (represented by calcium) positively influenced AGBW levels. Furthermore, interactions between long-term climatic water deficit (CWD) and both [Ca]ex and the maximum plant-available soil water content (θP) suggest that AGBW in Caatinga is driven by complex interactions. Soil properties were also related to community functional properties, with all community-weighted mean maximum stem diameter (CWMdmax), community-weighted mean wood density (CWMwd), functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve), and functional divergence (FDiv) being influenced by soil properties. In that regard, an inverse relationship was found between soil base cations and CWMwd. In contrast, soil base cations had a positive influence on CWMdmax. Finally, several soil nutritional metrics positively influenced FRic, while only a few elements inversely influenced both FEve and FDiv metrics. These relationships are thought to reflect vegetation trade-offs between investment in secondary growth and water-economy strategies. Collectively, these results provide information on the multiple ways through which soils can affect vegetation structure and functioning. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/59/59139/tde-29062023-140152/ |
url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/59/59139/tde-29062023-140152/ |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
_version_ |
1815257469283205120 |