Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruno Pontes Costanzo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2017.tde-07112017-145017
Resumo: A bibliometric study was carried out to identify the main innovations and shortcomings pointed out by scientific research on impact assessment (IA). Out of 1,547 articles published between 1990 and 2015 in two leading journals, IAPA and EIAR, 381 were reviewed for their contents related to new methodological approaches or proposals for improving practice. It was found that innovations and gaps are predominantly treated disregarding IA\'s theoretical basis. We suggest that IA core values shall always guide innovation. It is proposed that the theoretical boundaries of an IA System shall be previously stablished when discussing innovation. The information systematized through a bibliometric approach allowed to propose a framework that correlates IA theoretical foundations with innovation options in a vertical integration way.
id USP_345f8a5e20dd28b54e57f26eee3a2b12
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-07112017-145017
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str 2721
spelling info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test. Inovação em avaliação de impactos: revisão bibliométrica e teste prático. 2017-09-01Luis Enrique SánchezMiguel Sala CoutinhoCarla Grigoletto DuarteAlberto de Freitas Castro FonsecaAmarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo GallardoBruno Pontes CostanzoUniversidade de São PauloEngenharia MineralUSPBR Effectiveness Environmental impact assessment Impactos ambientais (Avaliação) Innovation Mineração Mining Systems Theoretical basis A bibliometric study was carried out to identify the main innovations and shortcomings pointed out by scientific research on impact assessment (IA). Out of 1,547 articles published between 1990 and 2015 in two leading journals, IAPA and EIAR, 381 were reviewed for their contents related to new methodological approaches or proposals for improving practice. It was found that innovations and gaps are predominantly treated disregarding IA\'s theoretical basis. We suggest that IA core values shall always guide innovation. It is proposed that the theoretical boundaries of an IA System shall be previously stablished when discussing innovation. The information systematized through a bibliometric approach allowed to propose a framework that correlates IA theoretical foundations with innovation options in a vertical integration way. Um estudo bibliométrico foi desenvolvido para identificar as principais inovações e lacunas apontadas pela pesquisa científica em avaliação de impactos (AI). Dos 1.547 artigos publicados entre 1990 e 2015 nos dois periódicos de maior relevância na área, o IAPA e o EIAR, 381 artigos tiveram seus conteúdos analisados em relação a novas abordagens metodológicas ou propostas para melhoria da prática. Verificou-se que as inovações e lacunas são tratadas predominantemente desconsiderando a base teórica de AI. Sugerimos que os valores fundamentais da avaliação de impactos devem sempre orientar a inovação. Propõe-se que as fronteiras teóricas de um Sistema AI sejam estabelecidas previamente ao se discutir a inovação. A informação sistematizada através de uma abordagem bibliométrica permitiu propor uma estrutura que correlaciona os fundamentos teóricos da avaliação de impactos com as opções de inovação. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2017.tde-07112017-145017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP2023-12-21T18:25:14Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-07112017-145017Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212023-12-22T12:18:02.006145Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
dc.title.alternative.pt.fl_str_mv Inovação em avaliação de impactos: revisão bibliométrica e teste prático.
title Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
spellingShingle Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
Bruno Pontes Costanzo
title_short Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
title_full Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
title_fullStr Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
title_full_unstemmed Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
title_sort Innovation in impact assessment: a bibliometric review and a practical test.
author Bruno Pontes Costanzo
author_facet Bruno Pontes Costanzo
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Luis Enrique Sánchez
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Miguel Sala Coutinho
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Carla Grigoletto Duarte
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Alberto de Freitas Castro Fonseca
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruno Pontes Costanzo
contributor_str_mv Luis Enrique Sánchez
Miguel Sala Coutinho
Carla Grigoletto Duarte
Alberto de Freitas Castro Fonseca
Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo
description A bibliometric study was carried out to identify the main innovations and shortcomings pointed out by scientific research on impact assessment (IA). Out of 1,547 articles published between 1990 and 2015 in two leading journals, IAPA and EIAR, 381 were reviewed for their contents related to new methodological approaches or proposals for improving practice. It was found that innovations and gaps are predominantly treated disregarding IA\'s theoretical basis. We suggest that IA core values shall always guide innovation. It is proposed that the theoretical boundaries of an IA System shall be previously stablished when discussing innovation. The information systematized through a bibliometric approach allowed to propose a framework that correlates IA theoretical foundations with innovation options in a vertical integration way.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2017.tde-07112017-145017
url https://doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2017.tde-07112017-145017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Engenharia Mineral
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv USP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1794502552802295808

Registros relacionados