Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ciantelli, Thales Lippi
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Texto Completo: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-25112021-115622/
Resumo: Introduction: to compare the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment using two different protocols: maxillary premolar extractions and skeletally anchored molar distalization using the Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer with lateral radiographs and digitized models. Material and Methods: The sample comprised 35 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 15 patients treated with the Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer (MAD), followed by fixed appliances. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients treated with maxillary first premolar extractions (XP2). Lateral radiographs were digitized with the ScanMaker i800 and analyzed with the Dolphin Imaging 11.9 software. The plaster models were digitized with the scanner 3Shape R700 and the digitized models were analyzed with the software OrthoAnalyzer. The intergroups treatment changes were compared with t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests, depending on normality. Results: The MAD group presented significantly greater intrusion of maxillary incisors, maxillary molar distalization and distal rotation, mandibular incisors labial tipping and mandibular molars mesialization. The XP2 group showed significantly maxillary molar mesial movement, greater reduction in the intermolar distance, arc perimeter, and arc length. Conclusion: Both protocols effectively treated Class II malocclusion promoting dentoalveolar changes. The MAD produced more mandibular incisor\'s labial tipping and accentuated molar distal rotation. The XP2 protocol promotes significantly greater reduction of the transversal arch dimensions.
id USP_455f810177b6fae610a2f6da7082baa4
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-25112021-115622
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str 2721
spelling Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatmentComparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatmentAngle Class IIImageamento tridimensionalImagingMá Oclusão de Angle Classe II, Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodônticaMalocclusionOrthodontic anchorage procedures.Three-dimensionalIntroduction: to compare the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment using two different protocols: maxillary premolar extractions and skeletally anchored molar distalization using the Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer with lateral radiographs and digitized models. Material and Methods: The sample comprised 35 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 15 patients treated with the Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer (MAD), followed by fixed appliances. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients treated with maxillary first premolar extractions (XP2). Lateral radiographs were digitized with the ScanMaker i800 and analyzed with the Dolphin Imaging 11.9 software. The plaster models were digitized with the scanner 3Shape R700 and the digitized models were analyzed with the software OrthoAnalyzer. The intergroups treatment changes were compared with t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests, depending on normality. Results: The MAD group presented significantly greater intrusion of maxillary incisors, maxillary molar distalization and distal rotation, mandibular incisors labial tipping and mandibular molars mesialization. The XP2 group showed significantly maxillary molar mesial movement, greater reduction in the intermolar distance, arc perimeter, and arc length. Conclusion: Both protocols effectively treated Class II malocclusion promoting dentoalveolar changes. The MAD produced more mandibular incisor\'s labial tipping and accentuated molar distal rotation. The XP2 protocol promotes significantly greater reduction of the transversal arch dimensions.Introdução: comparar os efeitos dentoesqueléticos e de tecidos moles do tratamento da má oclusão de Classe II utilizando dois diferentes protocolos: extrações de prémolares superiores e distalização de molares com ancoragem esquelética direta com o Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer a partir de radiografias laterais e modelos digitalizados. Material e Métodos: A amostra foi composta por 35 pacientes com má oclusão de Classe II divididos em dois grupos: Grupo 1 composto por 15 pacientes tratados com o Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer (MAD), seguido de aparelhos fixos. O Grupo 2 consistiu de 20 pacientes tratados com extrações de primeiros pré-molares superiores (XP2). As radiografias laterais foram digitalizadas com o ScanMaker i800 e analisadas com o software Dolphin Imaging 11.9. Os modelos de gesso foram digitalizados com o scanner 3Shape R700 e os modelos digitalizados foram analisados com o software OrthoAnalyzer. As mudanças de tratamento intergrupos foram comparadas com testes t ou testes de Mann-Whitney, dependendo da normalidade. Resultados: O grupo MAD apresentou intrusão significativamente maior dos incisivos superiores, distalização e rotação dos molares superiores, inclinação labial dos incisivos inferiors e mesialização dos molares inferiores. O grupo XP2 apresentou significativamente movimento mesial dos molares superiores, maior redução na distância intermolar, perímetro do arco e comprimento do arco. Conclusão: Ambos os protocolos trataram efetivamente a má oclusão de Classe II, promovendo alterações dentoalveolares. A MAD produziu mais inclinação labial dos incisivos inferiores e rotação distal acentuada do molar superior. O protocolo XP2 promove redução significante das dimensões do arco dentário.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPHenriques, Jose Fernando CastanhaCiantelli, Thales Lippi2021-03-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-25112021-115622/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2024-08-02T16:52:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-25112021-115622Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-08-02T16:52:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
title Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
spellingShingle Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
Ciantelli, Thales Lippi
Angle Class II
Imageamento tridimensional
Imaging
Má Oclusão de Angle Classe II, Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica
Malocclusion
Orthodontic anchorage procedures.
Three-dimensional
title_short Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
title_full Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
title_fullStr Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
title_sort Comparison of direct skeletally anchorage distalization and two premolar extractions for Class II treatment
author Ciantelli, Thales Lippi
author_facet Ciantelli, Thales Lippi
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Henriques, Jose Fernando Castanha
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ciantelli, Thales Lippi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Angle Class II
Imageamento tridimensional
Imaging
Má Oclusão de Angle Classe II, Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica
Malocclusion
Orthodontic anchorage procedures.
Three-dimensional
topic Angle Class II
Imageamento tridimensional
Imaging
Má Oclusão de Angle Classe II, Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica
Malocclusion
Orthodontic anchorage procedures.
Three-dimensional
description Introduction: to compare the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment using two different protocols: maxillary premolar extractions and skeletally anchored molar distalization using the Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer with lateral radiographs and digitized models. Material and Methods: The sample comprised 35 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 15 patients treated with the Miniscrew-Anchored Distalizer (MAD), followed by fixed appliances. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients treated with maxillary first premolar extractions (XP2). Lateral radiographs were digitized with the ScanMaker i800 and analyzed with the Dolphin Imaging 11.9 software. The plaster models were digitized with the scanner 3Shape R700 and the digitized models were analyzed with the software OrthoAnalyzer. The intergroups treatment changes were compared with t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests, depending on normality. Results: The MAD group presented significantly greater intrusion of maxillary incisors, maxillary molar distalization and distal rotation, mandibular incisors labial tipping and mandibular molars mesialization. The XP2 group showed significantly maxillary molar mesial movement, greater reduction in the intermolar distance, arc perimeter, and arc length. Conclusion: Both protocols effectively treated Class II malocclusion promoting dentoalveolar changes. The MAD produced more mandibular incisor\'s labial tipping and accentuated molar distal rotation. The XP2 protocol promotes significantly greater reduction of the transversal arch dimensions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-19
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-25112021-115622/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-25112021-115622/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1815257347215327232