Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
Texto Completo: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-02092024-145507/ |
Resumo: | This study aimed to compare the efficiency and dentoskeletal changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever and the pendulum appliance. To evaluate dentoskeletal changes before and after distalization, cephalometric analysis and superimposition of digital models were used. In this analysis, the sample consisted of 52 patients divided into two groups, according to the treatment received. The miniscrew group (MG) consisted of 23 patients treated with upper molar distalization using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever. The pendulum group (PG) consisted of 29 patients treated with distalization of upper molars with the pendulum appliance. To evaluate the efficiency of the treatment, model analysis was performed before and after orthodontic treatment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (OGS) indexes. In this evaluation, 28 patients were divided into 14 patients in MG and 14 patients in GP. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the T and Mann-Whitney tests. The MANCOVA test was used to evaluate the influence of covariates (P<0.05). The results showed that both devices effectively achieved molar distalization, with the MG showing greater control of side effects, such as loss of anchorage, during distalization compared to the PG. The PG showed a greater increase in overjet. Furthermore, the MG presented significantly shorter treatment time and better occlusal results than the PG, with lower final PAR, higher percentage of PAR reduction, higher Treatment Efficiency Index (TEI) and lower alignment/rotation and occlusal relationship scores in the OGS index. The miniscrew-anchored cantilever proved to be more efficient in correcting Class II malocclusion compared to the pendulum device. These findings highlight the importance of skeletal anchorage in molar distalization, as it improves occlusal results and reduces treatment time. |
id |
USP_86231684287bcb6fc7f7348ef46ef949 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-02092024-145507 |
network_acronym_str |
USP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository_id_str |
2721 |
spelling |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correctionAnálise comparativa da eficiência e dos efeitos dentoesqueléticos entre a distalização de molares com pêndulo de Hilgers e cantiléver ancorado em miniparafuso para correção da Classe IIAparelhos ortodônticosMá oclusão Classe II de AngleMalocclusion Angle Class IIOrthodontic anchorage proceduresOrthodontic appliancesProcedimentos de ancoragem ortodônticaThis study aimed to compare the efficiency and dentoskeletal changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever and the pendulum appliance. To evaluate dentoskeletal changes before and after distalization, cephalometric analysis and superimposition of digital models were used. In this analysis, the sample consisted of 52 patients divided into two groups, according to the treatment received. The miniscrew group (MG) consisted of 23 patients treated with upper molar distalization using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever. The pendulum group (PG) consisted of 29 patients treated with distalization of upper molars with the pendulum appliance. To evaluate the efficiency of the treatment, model analysis was performed before and after orthodontic treatment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (OGS) indexes. In this evaluation, 28 patients were divided into 14 patients in MG and 14 patients in GP. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the T and Mann-Whitney tests. The MANCOVA test was used to evaluate the influence of covariates (P<0.05). The results showed that both devices effectively achieved molar distalization, with the MG showing greater control of side effects, such as loss of anchorage, during distalization compared to the PG. The PG showed a greater increase in overjet. Furthermore, the MG presented significantly shorter treatment time and better occlusal results than the PG, with lower final PAR, higher percentage of PAR reduction, higher Treatment Efficiency Index (TEI) and lower alignment/rotation and occlusal relationship scores in the OGS index. The miniscrew-anchored cantilever proved to be more efficient in correcting Class II malocclusion compared to the pendulum device. These findings highlight the importance of skeletal anchorage in molar distalization, as it improves occlusal results and reduces treatment time.Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar a eficiência e as alterações dentoesqueléticas do tratamento da má oclusão de Classe II utilizando o cantiléver ancorado a miniparafuso e o aparelho pêndulo. Para avaliar as alterações dentoesqueléticas antes e após a distalização, foram utilizadas análise cefalométrica e sobreposição de modelos digitais. Nesta análise, a amostra foi composta por 52 pacientes divididos em dois grupos, de acordo com o tratamento recebido. O grupo miniparafuso (GM) foi composto por 23 pacientes tratados com distalização de molares superiores utilizando cantiléver ancorado a miniparafuso. O grupo pêndulo (GP) foi composto por 29 pacientes tratados com distalização de molares superiores com aparelho pêndulo. Para avaliar a eficiência do tratamento, foi realizada a análise de modelos antes e após o tratamento ortodôntico utilizando os índices Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) e American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (OGS). Nesta avaliação, 28 pacientes foram divididos em 14 pacientes no GM e 14 pacientes no GP. As comparações intergrupos foram realizadas por meio dos testes T e Mann-Whitney. O teste MANCOVA foi utilizado para avaliar a influência das covariáveis (P<0,05). Os resultados mostraram que ambos os dispositivos alcançaram efetivamente a distalização dos molares, com o GM apresentando maior controle dos efeitos colaterais, como perda de ancoragem, durante a distalização em comparação ao GP. O GP apresentou um aumento maior na sobressaliência. Além disso, o GM apresentou tempo de tratamento significativamente menor e melhores resultados oclusais do que o GP, com menor PAR final, maior percentual de redução do PAR, maior Índice de Eficiência de Tratamento (IET) e menores escores de alinhamento/rotação e relação oclusal no índice OGS. O cantiléver ancorado a miniparafuso mostrou-se mais eficiente na correção da má oclusão de Classe II em comparação ao aparelho pêndulo. Esses achados destacam a importância da ancoragem esquelética na distalização dos molares, pois melhora os resultados oclusais e reduz o tempo de tratamento.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPHenriques, Jose Fernando CastanhaCampos, Cassio Bernard Alves2024-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-02092024-145507/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPReter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2024-10-09T13:16:04Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-02092024-145507Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-10-09T13:16:04Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction Análise comparativa da eficiência e dos efeitos dentoesqueléticos entre a distalização de molares com pêndulo de Hilgers e cantiléver ancorado em miniparafuso para correção da Classe II |
title |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction |
spellingShingle |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction Campos, Cassio Bernard Alves Aparelhos ortodônticos Má oclusão Classe II de Angle Malocclusion Angle Class II Orthodontic anchorage procedures Orthodontic appliances Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis of the efficiency and dentoskeletal effects between distalization of molars with Hilgers pendulum and miniscrew-anchored cantilever for Class II correction |
author |
Campos, Cassio Bernard Alves |
author_facet |
Campos, Cassio Bernard Alves |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Henriques, Jose Fernando Castanha |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Cassio Bernard Alves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aparelhos ortodônticos Má oclusão Classe II de Angle Malocclusion Angle Class II Orthodontic anchorage procedures Orthodontic appliances Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica |
topic |
Aparelhos ortodônticos Má oclusão Classe II de Angle Malocclusion Angle Class II Orthodontic anchorage procedures Orthodontic appliances Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica |
description |
This study aimed to compare the efficiency and dentoskeletal changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever and the pendulum appliance. To evaluate dentoskeletal changes before and after distalization, cephalometric analysis and superimposition of digital models were used. In this analysis, the sample consisted of 52 patients divided into two groups, according to the treatment received. The miniscrew group (MG) consisted of 23 patients treated with upper molar distalization using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever. The pendulum group (PG) consisted of 29 patients treated with distalization of upper molars with the pendulum appliance. To evaluate the efficiency of the treatment, model analysis was performed before and after orthodontic treatment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (OGS) indexes. In this evaluation, 28 patients were divided into 14 patients in MG and 14 patients in GP. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the T and Mann-Whitney tests. The MANCOVA test was used to evaluate the influence of covariates (P<0.05). The results showed that both devices effectively achieved molar distalization, with the MG showing greater control of side effects, such as loss of anchorage, during distalization compared to the PG. The PG showed a greater increase in overjet. Furthermore, the MG presented significantly shorter treatment time and better occlusal results than the PG, with lower final PAR, higher percentage of PAR reduction, higher Treatment Efficiency Index (TEI) and lower alignment/rotation and occlusal relationship scores in the OGS index. The miniscrew-anchored cantilever proved to be more efficient in correcting Class II malocclusion compared to the pendulum device. These findings highlight the importance of skeletal anchorage in molar distalization, as it improves occlusal results and reduces treatment time. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-22 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-02092024-145507/ |
url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-02092024-145507/ |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
_version_ |
1815256482119155712 |