Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/article/view/7401 |
Resumo: | In this paper, we present a discussion about the structure and quality of the arguments elaborated by Chemistry and Physics teachers on subjects of Science Education. The protocol for obtaining the research data corresponded to assertions on which the research subjects had to express their points of view, justifying them. The written data were analyzed in according to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (2006), but re-placed in the density of a situated discourse (AMOSSY, 2007). The arguments produced were compared to each other and characterized in their quality regarding a dialectical structural as well as rhetorical aspects. In addition to a basic argument structure, were found arguments with refutators, which originated another argumentative structure with detailed data presentations and background knowledge. We also verified elements that could be perceived as characteristic of the dimension of pathos and ethos, from the point of view of argumentation as persuasion. |
id |
UTFPR-7_965c8b3695bfc2f947d7edd8892b01fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.utfpr:article/7401 |
network_acronym_str |
UTFPR-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspectsArgumentos de professores de química e física sobre modelos de ensino: aspectos estruturais, dialéticos e retóricosEducação; ensino-aprendizagemArgumentos; Características e qualidade de argumentos;Educação em CiênciasArguments; Characteristics and quality of arguments; Science educationIn this paper, we present a discussion about the structure and quality of the arguments elaborated by Chemistry and Physics teachers on subjects of Science Education. The protocol for obtaining the research data corresponded to assertions on which the research subjects had to express their points of view, justifying them. The written data were analyzed in according to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (2006), but re-placed in the density of a situated discourse (AMOSSY, 2007). The arguments produced were compared to each other and characterized in their quality regarding a dialectical structural as well as rhetorical aspects. In addition to a basic argument structure, were found arguments with refutators, which originated another argumentative structure with detailed data presentations and background knowledge. We also verified elements that could be perceived as characteristic of the dimension of pathos and ethos, from the point of view of argumentation as persuasion.Neste artigo, apresentamos uma discussão sobre a estrutura e a qualidade dos argumentos elaborados por professores de Química e Física sobre temas da Educação em Ciências. O protocolo de obtenção dos dados da pesquisa correspondeu a asserções sobre as quais os sujeitos tiveram que expressar seus pontos de vista, justificando-os. Os dados escritos foram analisados de acordo com o Padrão de Argumento de Toulmin, porém recolocando-o na densidade de um discurso situado. Os argumentos produzidos foram comparados entre si e caracterizados em sua qualidade tendo em vista os aspectos estruturais dialéticos bem como os retóricos. Além de uma estrutura básica de argumento, foram encontrados argumentos com refutadores, os quais originavam outra estrutura argumentativa com apresentações detalhadas de dados e conhecimentos de base. Foram verificados, ainda, elementos que puderam ser percebidos como característicos da dimensão do pathos e do ethos, na perspectiva da argumentação enquanto persuasão.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)CapesCNPqda Costa Tourinho e Silva, AdjaneNardi, Roberto2019-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/article/view/740110.3895/rbect.v12n2.7401Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 12, n. 2 (2019)1982-873X10.3895/rbect.v12n2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologiainstname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)instacron:UTFPRporhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/article/view/7401/pdfDireitos autorais 2019 CC-BYhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-09-29T18:40:43Zoai:periodicos.utfpr:article/7401Revistahttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbectPUBhttps://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/oai||rbect-pg@utfpr.edu.br1982-873X1982-873Xopendoar:2022-09-29T18:40:43Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects Argumentos de professores de química e física sobre modelos de ensino: aspectos estruturais, dialéticos e retóricos |
title |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects |
spellingShingle |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects da Costa Tourinho e Silva, Adjane Educação; ensino-aprendizagem Argumentos; Características e qualidade de argumentos;Educação em Ciências Arguments; Characteristics and quality of arguments; Science education |
title_short |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects |
title_full |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects |
title_fullStr |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects |
title_sort |
Arguments of chemistry and physics teachers on teaching models: structural, dialectical and rhetorical aspects |
author |
da Costa Tourinho e Silva, Adjane |
author_facet |
da Costa Tourinho e Silva, Adjane Nardi, Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nardi, Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Capes CNPq |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Costa Tourinho e Silva, Adjane Nardi, Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educação; ensino-aprendizagem Argumentos; Características e qualidade de argumentos;Educação em Ciências Arguments; Characteristics and quality of arguments; Science education |
topic |
Educação; ensino-aprendizagem Argumentos; Características e qualidade de argumentos;Educação em Ciências Arguments; Characteristics and quality of arguments; Science education |
description |
In this paper, we present a discussion about the structure and quality of the arguments elaborated by Chemistry and Physics teachers on subjects of Science Education. The protocol for obtaining the research data corresponded to assertions on which the research subjects had to express their points of view, justifying them. The written data were analyzed in according to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (2006), but re-placed in the density of a situated discourse (AMOSSY, 2007). The arguments produced were compared to each other and characterized in their quality regarding a dialectical structural as well as rhetorical aspects. In addition to a basic argument structure, were found arguments with refutators, which originated another argumentative structure with detailed data presentations and background knowledge. We also verified elements that could be perceived as characteristic of the dimension of pathos and ethos, from the point of view of argumentation as persuasion. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/article/view/7401 10.3895/rbect.v12n2.7401 |
url |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/article/view/7401 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3895/rbect.v12n2.7401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbect/article/view/7401/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2019 CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2019 CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 12, n. 2 (2019) 1982-873X 10.3895/rbect.v12n2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) instacron:UTFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
instacron_str |
UTFPR |
institution |
UTFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbect-pg@utfpr.edu.br |
_version_ |
1787713871320973312 |