FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Araujo Carmo, Alex Sandro
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3578
Resumo: The media in general, many times, are described as manipulative and creative of values and beliefs. Thinking in this way, one forgets that the speeches broadcasted for it are only reproduced, that is, in the mass media saying it always has the return of to the already-said that is constituent of the sense of all saying. In this way, it is intended to make a comparison between two discursive practical (journalistic and publicity), that turns on the subject: yogurt consumption and body care, with the intention to show that they reproduce the same speech, or better, that they speak of the same discursive position and, therefore, cannot be responsible by creating/producing speeches. Two theories will be convoked to accomplishment this article concepts that do not understand the subject in the same way: one, the Discourse Analysis of the French line (AD), anchored, mainly, in the studies of Pêcheux (1997) and Orlandi (2001), and the other one, the Theory of Argumentation in Language, by Ducrot (1989), as auxiliary theory. The fact that allows in this study, that these theories so different are mixed and worked together is that the last one will be seen from a discursive point of view. In this way, one tries to evidence that even though in different supports, that is, in the case of this work, the journalistic and the publicity, it’s possible to broaden/to reproduce the same speech. Key words: media, discursive practical, topos, meaning effects
id Unioeste-1_5ab1cf50cb175f606a3abc75a44706f6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/3578
network_acronym_str Unioeste-1
network_name_str Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALSDO JORNALÍSTICO AO PUBLICITÁRIO: UMA COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE PRÁTICAS DISCURSIVASmídiaprática discursivatoposefeito de sentido. The media in general, many times, are described as manipulative and creative of values and beliefs. Thinking in this way, one forgets that the speeches broadcasted for it are only reproduced, that is, in the mass media saying it always has the return of to the already-said that is constituent of the sense of all saying. In this way, it is intended to make a comparison between two discursive practical (journalistic and publicity), that turns on the subject: yogurt consumption and body care, with the intention to show that they reproduce the same speech, or better, that they speak of the same discursive position and, therefore, cannot be responsible by creating/producing speeches. Two theories will be convoked to accomplishment this article concepts that do not understand the subject in the same way: one, the Discourse Analysis of the French line (AD), anchored, mainly, in the studies of Pêcheux (1997) and Orlandi (2001), and the other one, the Theory of Argumentation in Language, by Ducrot (1989), as auxiliary theory. The fact that allows in this study, that these theories so different are mixed and worked together is that the last one will be seen from a discursive point of view. In this way, one tries to evidence that even though in different supports, that is, in the case of this work, the journalistic and the publicity, it’s possible to broaden/to reproduce the same speech. Key words: media, discursive practical, topos, meaning effects A mídia em geral, muitas vezes, é descrita como manipuladora e criadora de valores e crenças. Ao se pensar assim, esquece-se que os discursos veiculados por ela são apenas reproduzidos, isto é, que no dizer dos meios de comunicação há sempre a volta de um já-dito que é constitutivo do sentido de todo dizer. A essa luz, pretende-se fazer uma comparação entre duas práticas discursivas (uma jornalística e outra publicitária), que versam sobre a temática: consumo de iogurte e cuidados com o corpo, no intuito de mostrar que elas reproduzem o mesmo discurso, quer dizer, que falam de uma mesma posição discursiva e, por isso, não podem ser responsabilizadas por criar/produzir discursos. Serão convocados para a realização deste artigo conceitos oriundos de duas teorias que não entendem o sujeito da mesma forma, sendo: uma, a Análise de Discurso de linha francesa (AD), ancorada, principalmente, nos estudos de Pêcheux (1997) e Orlandi (2001), como aparato teórico de base; e outra, a Teoria da Argumentação na Língua, nos moldes de Ducrot (1989), como teoria auxiliar. O fato que permite, neste estudo, que estas teorias tão distintas sejam comungadas e trabalhadas em conjunto é que a última será vista a partir de um ponto de vista discursivo. Desta maneira, busca-se evidenciar que mesmo em suportes diferentes, isto é, no caso deste trabalho, no jornalístico e no publicitário, se pode veicular/reproduzir o mesmo discurso.Unioeste2010-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3578Travessias; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010)Travessias; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2010)Travessias; v. 4 n. 1 (2010)1982-5935reponame:Travessias (Cascavel. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)instacron:Unioesteporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3578/2837Copyright (c) 2010 Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com indicação da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Araujo Carmo, Alex Sandro2020-12-08T11:43:08Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/3578Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessiasPUBhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/oairevista.travessias@unioeste.br1982-59351982-5935opendoar:2020-12-08T11:43:08Travessias (Cascavel. Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
DO JORNALÍSTICO AO PUBLICITÁRIO: UMA COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE PRÁTICAS DISCURSIVAS
title FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
spellingShingle FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
de Araujo Carmo, Alex Sandro
mídia
prática discursiva
topos
efeito de sentido.
title_short FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
title_full FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
title_fullStr FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
title_full_unstemmed FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
title_sort FROM THE JOURNALISTIC TO THE PUBLICITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISCURSIVE PRACTICALS
author de Araujo Carmo, Alex Sandro
author_facet de Araujo Carmo, Alex Sandro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Araujo Carmo, Alex Sandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv mídia
prática discursiva
topos
efeito de sentido.
topic mídia
prática discursiva
topos
efeito de sentido.
description The media in general, many times, are described as manipulative and creative of values and beliefs. Thinking in this way, one forgets that the speeches broadcasted for it are only reproduced, that is, in the mass media saying it always has the return of to the already-said that is constituent of the sense of all saying. In this way, it is intended to make a comparison between two discursive practical (journalistic and publicity), that turns on the subject: yogurt consumption and body care, with the intention to show that they reproduce the same speech, or better, that they speak of the same discursive position and, therefore, cannot be responsible by creating/producing speeches. Two theories will be convoked to accomplishment this article concepts that do not understand the subject in the same way: one, the Discourse Analysis of the French line (AD), anchored, mainly, in the studies of Pêcheux (1997) and Orlandi (2001), and the other one, the Theory of Argumentation in Language, by Ducrot (1989), as auxiliary theory. The fact that allows in this study, that these theories so different are mixed and worked together is that the last one will be seen from a discursive point of view. In this way, one tries to evidence that even though in different supports, that is, in the case of this work, the journalistic and the publicity, it’s possible to broaden/to reproduce the same speech. Key words: media, discursive practical, topos, meaning effects
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3578
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3578
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/3578/2837
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unioeste
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unioeste
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Travessias; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010)
Travessias; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2010)
Travessias; v. 4 n. 1 (2010)
1982-5935
reponame:Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)
instacron:Unioeste
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)
instacron_str Unioeste
institution Unioeste
reponame_str Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
collection Travessias (Cascavel. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Travessias (Cascavel. Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.travessias@unioeste.br
_version_ 1798044916134182912