The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Calidoscópio (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.152.14 |
Resumo: | In this work, the aim is to investigate the relationships between the situation of action and the joint construction of the discourse by the interlocutors. To achieve this goal, I conduct a comparative study of two very different discourses: the chronicle Conversinha mineira, by Fernando Sabino, and the election debate between Dilma Rousseff and Aécio Neves, in the second round of the presidential campaign of 2014. To support the analysis, I use basically two concepts developed by Roulet: the negotiation process and interactional frame. The study of each speech showed that the author and the television channel have control of the interaction and make use of the strategy of creating interactions characterized by controversial and aggressive features or by mutual lack of comprehension of the interlocutors. Based on these elements, they can produce very attractive interactions for the reader and for the viewer.Keywords: situational dimension, textual articulation, power. |
id |
Unisinos-3_ee66d77dd82469593699c559f17fbcdc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/12472 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-3 |
network_name_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulationO impacto da dimensão situacional do discurso sobre a articulação textualIn this work, the aim is to investigate the relationships between the situation of action and the joint construction of the discourse by the interlocutors. To achieve this goal, I conduct a comparative study of two very different discourses: the chronicle Conversinha mineira, by Fernando Sabino, and the election debate between Dilma Rousseff and Aécio Neves, in the second round of the presidential campaign of 2014. To support the analysis, I use basically two concepts developed by Roulet: the negotiation process and interactional frame. The study of each speech showed that the author and the television channel have control of the interaction and make use of the strategy of creating interactions characterized by controversial and aggressive features or by mutual lack of comprehension of the interlocutors. Based on these elements, they can produce very attractive interactions for the reader and for the viewer.Keywords: situational dimension, textual articulation, power.Neste trabalho, o objetivo é investigar as relações entre a situação de ação e a construção conjunta do discurso pelos interlocutores. Para alcançar esse objetivo, procedo a um estudo contrastivo de dois discursos bastante diferentes: a crônica Conversinha mineira, de Fernando Sabino, e o debate eleitoral promovido pela Rede Globo entre Dilma Rousseff e Aécio Neves, no segundo turno da campanha presidencial de 2014. Para fundamentar as análises, articulo basicamente dois conceitos desenvolvidos em trabalhos de Roulet e sua equipe: processo de negociação e quadro interacional. O estudo de cada discurso e sua análise contrastiva evidenciaram que tanto o autor quanto a emissora de televisão, por terem o controle da interação, se valem da estratégia de criar interações marcadas pela polêmica e pela agressividade ou pela mútua incompreensão dos interlocutores. Com isso, conseguem produzir interações maximamente atrativas para o leitor e para o espectador, respectivamente.Palavras-chave: dimensão situacional, articulação textual, poder.Unisinos2017-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.152.14Calidoscópio; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017): May/August; 375-387Calidoscópio; v. 15 n. 2 (2017): maio/agosto; 375-3872177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.152.14/6183Cunha, Gustavo Ximenesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-10-09T18:30:45Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/12472Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2017-10-09T18:30:45Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation O impacto da dimensão situacional do discurso sobre a articulação textual |
title |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation |
spellingShingle |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation Cunha, Gustavo Ximenes |
title_short |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation |
title_full |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation |
title_fullStr |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation |
title_sort |
The impact of situational dimension of the discourse on textual articulation |
author |
Cunha, Gustavo Ximenes |
author_facet |
Cunha, Gustavo Ximenes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Gustavo Ximenes |
description |
In this work, the aim is to investigate the relationships between the situation of action and the joint construction of the discourse by the interlocutors. To achieve this goal, I conduct a comparative study of two very different discourses: the chronicle Conversinha mineira, by Fernando Sabino, and the election debate between Dilma Rousseff and Aécio Neves, in the second round of the presidential campaign of 2014. To support the analysis, I use basically two concepts developed by Roulet: the negotiation process and interactional frame. The study of each speech showed that the author and the television channel have control of the interaction and make use of the strategy of creating interactions characterized by controversial and aggressive features or by mutual lack of comprehension of the interlocutors. Based on these elements, they can produce very attractive interactions for the reader and for the viewer.Keywords: situational dimension, textual articulation, power. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.152.14 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.152.14 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2017.152.14/6183 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017): May/August; 375-387 Calidoscópio; v. 15 n. 2 (2017): maio/agosto; 375-387 2177-6202 reponame:Calidoscópio (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
collection |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1792203886764752896 |