Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ávila, Andressa Celente
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pante, Marina, Yates, Marina Balem, Silva, Dhiordan Cardoso, Schütz, Daiana Meregalli, Oliveira, Margareth da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Contextos Clínicos
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2019.123.10
Resumo: Self-report scales are characterized by ecological validity, feasibility andease of application. However, the information might be skewed due to the risks,therefore informants assessment can help. The aim of this study was investigate therelationship between self-report evaluation and the informants assessment topsychopathological symptoms. The sample was composed by 330 adults aged from18 years to 59 years who responded to an adult self-report and 330 informants filledout an Adult Behavior Checklist. Descriptive and inferential analysis wereperformed. T-test was conducted for independent groups to compare the resultsobtained by the respondent and the informant. The size effect was calculated byCohen's d. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed to investigate theassociations between the responses of the scales. The results of this study arecorroborated as indicators of psychopathological evaluation between respondentsand informants who present differences, which may be an advantage in anassessment process and later help the treatment planning. Information frominformants questionnaires are good sources to more accurate diagnosis process.Keywords: self-report; evaluation of symptoms; scales; psychopathology.
id Unisinos-4_9da8569e9eec2071de0082ddeec2cf22
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/17406
network_acronym_str Unisinos-4
network_name_str Contextos Clínicos
repository_id_str
spelling Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sampleAssociação entre autoavaliação e a análise de informantes sobre sintomas psicopatológicos em uma amostra adultaSelf-report scales are characterized by ecological validity, feasibility andease of application. However, the information might be skewed due to the risks,therefore informants assessment can help. The aim of this study was investigate therelationship between self-report evaluation and the informants assessment topsychopathological symptoms. The sample was composed by 330 adults aged from18 years to 59 years who responded to an adult self-report and 330 informants filledout an Adult Behavior Checklist. Descriptive and inferential analysis wereperformed. T-test was conducted for independent groups to compare the resultsobtained by the respondent and the informant. The size effect was calculated byCohen's d. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed to investigate theassociations between the responses of the scales. The results of this study arecorroborated as indicators of psychopathological evaluation between respondentsand informants who present differences, which may be an advantage in anassessment process and later help the treatment planning. Information frominformants questionnaires are good sources to more accurate diagnosis process.Keywords: self-report; evaluation of symptoms; scales; psychopathology.As escalas de autorrelato se caracterizam pela validade ecológica,viabilidade e facilidade de aplicação. Entretanto, as informações podem estarenviesadas devido aos pacientes terem a tendência a minimizar as respostas sendo,portanto, importante considerar a avaliação de informantes. O objetivo deste estudofoi investigar a associação entre a autoavaliação de adultos e a avaliação realizadapor informantes quanto a sintomas psicopatológicos. A amostra deste estudo foicomposta por 330 adultos com idades entre 18 e 59 anos que responderam a AdultSelf-Report e 330 informantes preencheram a Adult Behavior Checklist. Foramutilizadas análises descritivas e inferenciais. Foi conduzido um Teste t para gruposindependentes para comparar os resultados das escalas preenchidas pelorespondente e pelo informante. A magnitude das diferenças foi calculada a partir dotamanho do efeito (effect size) pelo d de Cohen. Também foi realizada uma análisede Coeficiente de Correlação de Pearson para investigar as associações entre asrespostas das escalas. Os resultados deste estudo corroboram com as evidências deque a avaliação de sintomas psicopatológicos entre respondentes e informantes apresentam diferenças, podendo ser uma vantagem em um processo de avaliação eposterior subsídio para planejamento de tratamento. Conclui-se que, embora asinformações oriundas de questionários de autorrelato sejam relevantes, é necessárioconsiderar outras fontes de dados do quadro do sujeito, a fim de tornar o diagnósticomais acurado.Palavras-chave: autorrelato; avaliação de sintomas; escalas; psicopatologia.Unisinos2019-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2019.123.1010.4013/ctc.2019.123.10Contextos Clínicos; v. 12 n. 3 (2019): Set-Dez; 902-9201983-3482reponame:Contextos Clínicosinstname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2019.123.10/60747359Ávila, Andressa CelentePante, MarinaYates, Marina BalemSilva, Dhiordan CardosoSchütz, Daiana MeregalliOliveira, Margareth da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-12-18T19:09:57Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/17406Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicosPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/oaidfalcke@unisinos.br||periodicos@unisinos.br1983-34821983-3482opendoar:2019-12-18T19:09:57Contextos Clínicos - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
Associação entre autoavaliação e a análise de informantes sobre sintomas psicopatológicos em uma amostra adulta
title Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
spellingShingle Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
Ávila, Andressa Celente
title_short Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
title_full Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
title_fullStr Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
title_full_unstemmed Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
title_sort Association between self-assessment and the analysis of informants about psychopathological symptoms in an adult sample
author Ávila, Andressa Celente
author_facet Ávila, Andressa Celente
Pante, Marina
Yates, Marina Balem
Silva, Dhiordan Cardoso
Schütz, Daiana Meregalli
Oliveira, Margareth da Silva
author_role author
author2 Pante, Marina
Yates, Marina Balem
Silva, Dhiordan Cardoso
Schütz, Daiana Meregalli
Oliveira, Margareth da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ávila, Andressa Celente
Pante, Marina
Yates, Marina Balem
Silva, Dhiordan Cardoso
Schütz, Daiana Meregalli
Oliveira, Margareth da Silva
description Self-report scales are characterized by ecological validity, feasibility andease of application. However, the information might be skewed due to the risks,therefore informants assessment can help. The aim of this study was investigate therelationship between self-report evaluation and the informants assessment topsychopathological symptoms. The sample was composed by 330 adults aged from18 years to 59 years who responded to an adult self-report and 330 informants filledout an Adult Behavior Checklist. Descriptive and inferential analysis wereperformed. T-test was conducted for independent groups to compare the resultsobtained by the respondent and the informant. The size effect was calculated byCohen's d. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed to investigate theassociations between the responses of the scales. The results of this study arecorroborated as indicators of psychopathological evaluation between respondentsand informants who present differences, which may be an advantage in anassessment process and later help the treatment planning. Information frominformants questionnaires are good sources to more accurate diagnosis process.Keywords: self-report; evaluation of symptoms; scales; psychopathology.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2019.123.10
10.4013/ctc.2019.123.10
url https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2019.123.10
identifier_str_mv 10.4013/ctc.2019.123.10
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/contextosclinicos/article/view/ctc.2019.123.10/60747359
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisinos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contextos Clínicos; v. 12 n. 3 (2019): Set-Dez; 902-920
1983-3482
reponame:Contextos Clínicos
instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron:Unisinos
instname_str Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron_str Unisinos
institution Unisinos
reponame_str Contextos Clínicos
collection Contextos Clínicos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contextos Clínicos - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dfalcke@unisinos.br||periodicos@unisinos.br
_version_ 1797240152034115584

Registros relacionados