Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Veras |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/65879 |
Resumo: | Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) is an accounting theory that aims to explain and predict accounting practices carried out by companies. This theory emerged as an alternative to the normative approach which emphasizes more on what accountants should do in presenting financial information. However, PAT also received criticism related to the assumptions used in this theory. Therefore, this paper aims to review how the approach and criticism of PAT. The method used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which is conducted by identifying, assessing, and interpreting all available research evidence regarding approaches and criticisms of PAT. The sources used in this paper are articles, books, and journals related to Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and the criticisms raised against it. The results show that PAT has developed into a science that can be used to explain the choice of methods to be used by managers and other constituents of financial statements that can be used for decision making. However, PAT has also been criticized including issues related to research methods, methodology, and the basic assumptions underlying the theory. In conclusion, Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) has had a significant impact on accounting practice, but keep in mind that this theory also has limitations and has been criticized by some parties. This paper provides an in-depth insight into the approaches and criticisms of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT), as well as highlighting the importance of critical evaluation of accounting theory in the development of accounting science as a whole. |
id |
VERACRUZ-0_06159bb7646fe3c6f8a6bb505f6ebea1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/65879 |
network_acronym_str |
VERACRUZ-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Veras |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature reviewpositive accounting theorynormative accounting theorycritiquePositive Accounting Theory (PAT) is an accounting theory that aims to explain and predict accounting practices carried out by companies. This theory emerged as an alternative to the normative approach which emphasizes more on what accountants should do in presenting financial information. However, PAT also received criticism related to the assumptions used in this theory. Therefore, this paper aims to review how the approach and criticism of PAT. The method used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which is conducted by identifying, assessing, and interpreting all available research evidence regarding approaches and criticisms of PAT. The sources used in this paper are articles, books, and journals related to Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and the criticisms raised against it. The results show that PAT has developed into a science that can be used to explain the choice of methods to be used by managers and other constituents of financial statements that can be used for decision making. However, PAT has also been criticized including issues related to research methods, methodology, and the basic assumptions underlying the theory. In conclusion, Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) has had a significant impact on accounting practice, but keep in mind that this theory also has limitations and has been criticized by some parties. This paper provides an in-depth insight into the approaches and criticisms of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT), as well as highlighting the importance of critical evaluation of accounting theory in the development of accounting science as a whole.Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.2023-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/6587910.34117/bjdv9n12-082Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023); 31784-31799Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12 (2023); 31784-31799Brazilian Journal of Development; v. 9 n. 12 (2023); 31784-317992525-8761reponame:Revista Verasinstname:Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz)instacron:VERACRUZenghttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/65879/47059Utari, CutserlyManalu, Mawar WindaLubis, Nazli RamadhaniMuda, Iskandarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-31T14:11:04Zoai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/65879Revistahttp://site.veracruz.edu.br:8087/instituto/revistaveras/index.php/revistaveras/PRIhttp://site.veracruz.edu.br:8087/instituto/revistaveras/index.php/revistaveras/oai||revistaveras@veracruz.edu.br2236-57292236-5729opendoar:2024-10-15T16:27:47.426240Revista Veras - Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
title |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
spellingShingle |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review Utari, Cutserly positive accounting theory normative accounting theory critique |
title_short |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
title_full |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
title_fullStr |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
title_sort |
Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review |
author |
Utari, Cutserly |
author_facet |
Utari, Cutserly Manalu, Mawar Winda Lubis, Nazli Ramadhani Muda, Iskandar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Manalu, Mawar Winda Lubis, Nazli Ramadhani Muda, Iskandar |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Utari, Cutserly Manalu, Mawar Winda Lubis, Nazli Ramadhani Muda, Iskandar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
positive accounting theory normative accounting theory critique |
topic |
positive accounting theory normative accounting theory critique |
description |
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) is an accounting theory that aims to explain and predict accounting practices carried out by companies. This theory emerged as an alternative to the normative approach which emphasizes more on what accountants should do in presenting financial information. However, PAT also received criticism related to the assumptions used in this theory. Therefore, this paper aims to review how the approach and criticism of PAT. The method used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which is conducted by identifying, assessing, and interpreting all available research evidence regarding approaches and criticisms of PAT. The sources used in this paper are articles, books, and journals related to Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and the criticisms raised against it. The results show that PAT has developed into a science that can be used to explain the choice of methods to be used by managers and other constituents of financial statements that can be used for decision making. However, PAT has also been criticized including issues related to research methods, methodology, and the basic assumptions underlying the theory. In conclusion, Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) has had a significant impact on accounting practice, but keep in mind that this theory also has limitations and has been criticized by some parties. This paper provides an in-depth insight into the approaches and criticisms of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT), as well as highlighting the importance of critical evaluation of accounting theory in the development of accounting science as a whole. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/65879 10.34117/bjdv9n12-082 |
url |
https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/65879 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34117/bjdv9n12-082 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/65879/47059 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023); 31784-31799 Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12 (2023); 31784-31799 Brazilian Journal of Development; v. 9 n. 12 (2023); 31784-31799 2525-8761 reponame:Revista Veras instname:Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz) instacron:VERACRUZ |
instname_str |
Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz) |
instacron_str |
VERACRUZ |
institution |
VERACRUZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Veras |
collection |
Revista Veras |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Veras - Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaveras@veracruz.edu.br |
_version_ |
1813645640713895936 |