Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Veras |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/22066 |
Resumo: | The objective was to evaluate the occurrence of pests, diseases and mortality rate in nine genotypes of cactus pear (Nopalea cochenillifera) destined for forage production. The genotypes were implanted in a complete randomized block design, with nine treatments and three replications. After 330 days of cultivation, the occurrence of pests and diseases and verification of plant mortality were carried out. Among all the pests and diseases observed in this experimental trial, the most prevalent disease regardless of the evaluated genotype was the anthracnose stain “Colletotrichum gloeosporioides” (49.20%) and the less frequent diseases were the resine “Dothiorella ribis” (6.87%) and soft rot “Erwinia carotovora” (2.58%). The only occurrence pest was the cochineal in scales “Diaspis echinocacti” (22.69%). The Texas (V13) and Negro Michoacan (F07) genotypes showed the highest occurrence of pests and diseases, from 50% of the total plants, followed by anthracnose stain and cochineal in scales. On the contrary, the genotypes Tamazunchale (V12) and California (V14) were not affected by any pest or disease. It was observed that the genotypes Nopalea Uruapan (V20) and Blanco San Pedro (V19), had a lower occurrence of pests and diseases, less than 20% of the total plants. The genotypes that presented the highest mortality rate were Texas (V13), Blanco San Pedro (V19) and Polotitlan (V09), with 80, 70 and 65% mortality rate, respectively. The genotypes Nopalea Uruapan (V20) and California (V14) had the lowest mortality rate (20 and 35%), respectively. The genotypes that were least affected by pests and diseases and had the lowest mortality rate are Tamazunchale (V12), California (V14) and Nopalea Uruapan (V20). |
id |
VERACRUZ-0_aaf17f693eeac3b423a33ca374ea3db6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/22066 |
network_acronym_str |
VERACRUZ-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Veras |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageiraCactaceaeIncidenceNopalea cochenilliferaForage productionSemiarid.The objective was to evaluate the occurrence of pests, diseases and mortality rate in nine genotypes of cactus pear (Nopalea cochenillifera) destined for forage production. The genotypes were implanted in a complete randomized block design, with nine treatments and three replications. After 330 days of cultivation, the occurrence of pests and diseases and verification of plant mortality were carried out. Among all the pests and diseases observed in this experimental trial, the most prevalent disease regardless of the evaluated genotype was the anthracnose stain “Colletotrichum gloeosporioides” (49.20%) and the less frequent diseases were the resine “Dothiorella ribis” (6.87%) and soft rot “Erwinia carotovora” (2.58%). The only occurrence pest was the cochineal in scales “Diaspis echinocacti” (22.69%). The Texas (V13) and Negro Michoacan (F07) genotypes showed the highest occurrence of pests and diseases, from 50% of the total plants, followed by anthracnose stain and cochineal in scales. On the contrary, the genotypes Tamazunchale (V12) and California (V14) were not affected by any pest or disease. It was observed that the genotypes Nopalea Uruapan (V20) and Blanco San Pedro (V19), had a lower occurrence of pests and diseases, less than 20% of the total plants. The genotypes that presented the highest mortality rate were Texas (V13), Blanco San Pedro (V19) and Polotitlan (V09), with 80, 70 and 65% mortality rate, respectively. The genotypes Nopalea Uruapan (V20) and California (V14) had the lowest mortality rate (20 and 35%), respectively. The genotypes that were least affected by pests and diseases and had the lowest mortality rate are Tamazunchale (V12), California (V14) and Nopalea Uruapan (V20).Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.2020-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/2206610.34117/bjdv6n12-581Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 6 No. 12 (2020); 101365-101376Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 6 Núm. 12 (2020); 101365-101376Brazilian Journal of Development; v. 6 n. 12 (2020); 101365-1013762525-8761reponame:Revista Verasinstname:Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz)instacron:VERACRUZenghttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/22066/17618Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Developmentinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacêdo, Alberto Jefferson da SilvaNeto, José Maria CesarRamos, João Paulo de FariasPereira, Danillo Martede Oliveira, Leydiane BezerraMuniz, Ana Cecilia SouzaAlves, Joyce PereiraBezerra, Higor Fábio CarvalhoEdvan, Ricardo LoiolaSantos, Edson Mauro2021-06-07T20:46:17Zoai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/22066Revistahttp://site.veracruz.edu.br:8087/instituto/revistaveras/index.php/revistaveras/PRIhttp://site.veracruz.edu.br:8087/instituto/revistaveras/index.php/revistaveras/oai||revistaveras@veracruz.edu.br2236-57292236-5729opendoar:2024-10-15T16:12:13.189801Revista Veras - Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
title |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
spellingShingle |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira Macêdo, Alberto Jefferson da Silva Cactaceae Incidence Nopalea cochenillifera Forage production Semiarid. |
title_short |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
title_full |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
title_fullStr |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
title_full_unstemmed |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
title_sort |
Occurrence of pests and diseases in cactus pear genotypes / Ocorrência de pragas e doenças em genótipos de palma forrageira |
author |
Macêdo, Alberto Jefferson da Silva |
author_facet |
Macêdo, Alberto Jefferson da Silva Neto, José Maria Cesar Ramos, João Paulo de Farias Pereira, Danillo Marte de Oliveira, Leydiane Bezerra Muniz, Ana Cecilia Souza Alves, Joyce Pereira Bezerra, Higor Fábio Carvalho Edvan, Ricardo Loiola Santos, Edson Mauro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neto, José Maria Cesar Ramos, João Paulo de Farias Pereira, Danillo Marte de Oliveira, Leydiane Bezerra Muniz, Ana Cecilia Souza Alves, Joyce Pereira Bezerra, Higor Fábio Carvalho Edvan, Ricardo Loiola Santos, Edson Mauro |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macêdo, Alberto Jefferson da Silva Neto, José Maria Cesar Ramos, João Paulo de Farias Pereira, Danillo Marte de Oliveira, Leydiane Bezerra Muniz, Ana Cecilia Souza Alves, Joyce Pereira Bezerra, Higor Fábio Carvalho Edvan, Ricardo Loiola Santos, Edson Mauro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cactaceae Incidence Nopalea cochenillifera Forage production Semiarid. |
topic |
Cactaceae Incidence Nopalea cochenillifera Forage production Semiarid. |
description |
The objective was to evaluate the occurrence of pests, diseases and mortality rate in nine genotypes of cactus pear (Nopalea cochenillifera) destined for forage production. The genotypes were implanted in a complete randomized block design, with nine treatments and three replications. After 330 days of cultivation, the occurrence of pests and diseases and verification of plant mortality were carried out. Among all the pests and diseases observed in this experimental trial, the most prevalent disease regardless of the evaluated genotype was the anthracnose stain “Colletotrichum gloeosporioides” (49.20%) and the less frequent diseases were the resine “Dothiorella ribis” (6.87%) and soft rot “Erwinia carotovora” (2.58%). The only occurrence pest was the cochineal in scales “Diaspis echinocacti” (22.69%). The Texas (V13) and Negro Michoacan (F07) genotypes showed the highest occurrence of pests and diseases, from 50% of the total plants, followed by anthracnose stain and cochineal in scales. On the contrary, the genotypes Tamazunchale (V12) and California (V14) were not affected by any pest or disease. It was observed that the genotypes Nopalea Uruapan (V20) and Blanco San Pedro (V19), had a lower occurrence of pests and diseases, less than 20% of the total plants. The genotypes that presented the highest mortality rate were Texas (V13), Blanco San Pedro (V19) and Polotitlan (V09), with 80, 70 and 65% mortality rate, respectively. The genotypes Nopalea Uruapan (V20) and California (V14) had the lowest mortality rate (20 and 35%), respectively. The genotypes that were least affected by pests and diseases and had the lowest mortality rate are Tamazunchale (V12), California (V14) and Nopalea Uruapan (V20). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/22066 10.34117/bjdv6n12-581 |
url |
https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/22066 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34117/bjdv6n12-581 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/22066/17618 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Development info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Development |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 6 No. 12 (2020); 101365-101376 Brazilian Journal of Development; Vol. 6 Núm. 12 (2020); 101365-101376 Brazilian Journal of Development; v. 6 n. 12 (2020); 101365-101376 2525-8761 reponame:Revista Veras instname:Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz) instacron:VERACRUZ |
instname_str |
Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz) |
instacron_str |
VERACRUZ |
institution |
VERACRUZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Veras |
collection |
Revista Veras |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Veras - Instituto Superior de Educação Vera Cruz (VeraCruz) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaveras@veracruz.edu.br |
_version_ |
1813645500847489024 |