Chemical characterization, antioxidant, cytotoxic, and antibacterial activities of Eugenia uniflora L. and Psidium cattleianum Sabine essential oils against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii/ Caracterização química, antioxidante, citotóxica e antibacteriana dos óleos essenciais de Eugenia uniflora L. e Psidium cattleianum Sabine contra Klebsiella pneumoniae e Acinetobacter baumannii

• Autor(a) principal: Garcia, Marcelle Oliveira
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Da Cunha, Kamila Furtado, Allend, Suzane Olachea, Da Silva, Mirian Elert, De Santi, Ivandra Ignês, Freitag, Rogério Antonio, Hübner, Silvia De Oliveira Rodrigues, Hartwig, Daiane Drawanz
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista Veras
• Texto Completo: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/26521
• topic: Pitanga; Araçá; Gram-negative bacteria; Myrtaceae.

INTRODUCTION: Eugenia uniflora L. and Psidium cattleianum Sabine essential oils (EO) can be biologically active and serve as novel sources of antibiotics for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii bacteria.METHODS: The EO of E. uniflora L. (EOE) and P. cattleianum Sabine (EOP) were extracted from de leaves of the plants and chemically characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The antioxidant potential was evaluated by the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate) technique and the cytotoxicity evaluated in mammalian VERO cell line by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The antibacterial activity of EOE and EOP was assessed by the broth microdilution method.RESULTS: The major compounds of EOE were benzofuran (24.38%), germacrene B (20.12%), ?-elemene (9.33%) and ?-cubebene (8.55%), and for EOP were ?-pinene (24.25%), ?-caryophyllene (20.45%), and eucalyptol (10.43%). Both EO tested showed low antioxidant effect and dose-dependent cytotoxicity in VERO cell line. The EOE was less toxic for the mammalian cells with an IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) index of 75.0 mg.mL-1. The EOP and EOE were more active against A. baumannii, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 14.0 and 56.0 mg.mL-1 and a minimal bactericide concentration (MBC) of 14.0 and 112.0 mg.mL-1, respectively.  CONCLUSIONS: Although EOE and EOP have low antioxidant and antibacterial activity against A. baumanni and K. pneumoniae new approaches can be applied to improve this effect in vivo.