Colisão entre direitos fundamentais: sob a ótica do Supremo Tribunal Federal

• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Ramon Grahl
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/7684
• topic: Colisão de direitos fundamentais; Direito constitucional; Direitos fundamentais; Princípio da proporcionalidade; Ponderação

The fundamental rights hallowed by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 are the maximum protection of the individual. Thus, despite their celebrated constitutional protection they are susceptible to relativization, since protection is relative as over and above. This term paper, utilizing bibliographic and documentary research, has the objective to evaluate the decisions of the Brazilian Supreme Court, presenting the solutions proposed by the referred court when existing collisions between fundamental rights, concentrating on the principle of proportional justice and to the balancing of values method. There was an effort to demonstrate the importance of the Brazilian Supreme Court in resolving conflicts between fundamental rights. It was possible to verify that the exercise of a right is always alleviated in the face of another, and when there is a collision, will be necessarily to use the constitutional tools, such as constitutional hermeneutics, principles, constitutional mechanisms and the method of weighing of values will be applied composed with the principle of proportional justice. Thus, it was concluded that the resolution of conflicts between fundamental rights will only succeed from the specific case, considering numerous interpretative tools used by the Brazilian Supreme Court.