O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5907 |
Resumo: | The main objective of this work is to formulate a proposal for the interpretation of the initial term of the prescriptive pretension, according to the rights conferred on the defendant in the Criminal Law and the basic precepts of the prescriptive institute. The method of deductive approach was used in the development of this study. The research, in relation to the level, is exploratory, using, more, the qualitative approach and the procedures of collection of bibliographic and documentary data. The results obtained point to the need to pacify the existing controversy around the initial term of the prescriptive pretension. It was verified that, with legislative and jurisprudential developments, it was possible to proceed with the condemnation execution of the conviction without, however, making it possible to comply. Thus, the State began to be punished for not exercising a claim without even being able to exercise it. The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, when interpreting article 112, item I, of the Penal Code, analyzes it in a literal way, that is, it makes possible the occurrence of the executory time limit in which there is no state inertia. The First Class of the Federal Supreme Court, otherwise, conditions the initial course of the aforementioned form of limitation of finality for the parties to the proceedings, so that the initial term would be linked to the possibility of complying with the condemnatory decree. Finally, it was possible to conclude that the discussion that surrounds the theme has great importance, aiming to avoid impunity in the criminal proceedings. It was pointed out, as a way of solving the problem, to associate the initial term from the time limit of the executory claim to the final res judicata to the prosecution (legal criterion) and to the possibility of executing the reprimand imposed (a criterion linked to the basic idea of prescriptive and to the principle of actio nata). Finally, it was stated that it is up to the Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court to pacify the issue, linking the other national courts, not forgetting for possible legislative changes that may influence the theme, according to draft legislation in progress in the National Congress. |
id |
Ânima_581060b287b1251b728f18284d91e110 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5907 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal FederalDireito PenalPrescrição da pretensão executóriaTermo inicialThe main objective of this work is to formulate a proposal for the interpretation of the initial term of the prescriptive pretension, according to the rights conferred on the defendant in the Criminal Law and the basic precepts of the prescriptive institute. The method of deductive approach was used in the development of this study. The research, in relation to the level, is exploratory, using, more, the qualitative approach and the procedures of collection of bibliographic and documentary data. The results obtained point to the need to pacify the existing controversy around the initial term of the prescriptive pretension. It was verified that, with legislative and jurisprudential developments, it was possible to proceed with the condemnation execution of the conviction without, however, making it possible to comply. Thus, the State began to be punished for not exercising a claim without even being able to exercise it. The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, when interpreting article 112, item I, of the Penal Code, analyzes it in a literal way, that is, it makes possible the occurrence of the executory time limit in which there is no state inertia. The First Class of the Federal Supreme Court, otherwise, conditions the initial course of the aforementioned form of limitation of finality for the parties to the proceedings, so that the initial term would be linked to the possibility of complying with the condemnatory decree. Finally, it was possible to conclude that the discussion that surrounds the theme has great importance, aiming to avoid impunity in the criminal proceedings. It was pointed out, as a way of solving the problem, to associate the initial term from the time limit of the executory claim to the final res judicata to the prosecution (legal criterion) and to the possibility of executing the reprimand imposed (a criterion linked to the basic idea of prescriptive and to the principle of actio nata). Finally, it was stated that it is up to the Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court to pacify the issue, linking the other national courts, not forgetting for possible legislative changes that may influence the theme, according to draft legislation in progress in the National Congress.O objetivo principal deste trabalho é formular uma proposta de interpretação do termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória, conforme os direitos conferidos ao réu no Direito Penal e os preceitos básicos do instituto da prescrição. Utilizou-se, no desenvolvimento deste estudo, o método de abordagem dedutivo. A pesquisa, em relação ao nível, é exploratória, utilizando, no mais, a abordagem qualitativa e os procedimentos de coleta de dados bibliográfico e documental. Os resultados obtidos apontam para a necessidade de pacificação da controvérsia existente em torno do termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória. Verificou-se que, com a evolução legislativa e jurisprudencial, possibilitou-se o transcurso da prescrição da condenação sem, todavia, viabilizar o seu cumprimento. Assim, o Estado passou a ser punido pelo não exercício de uma pretensão sem sequer poder exercê-la. O Superior Tribunal de Justiça, ao interpretar o artigo 112, inciso I, do Código Penal, analisa-o de modo literal, ou seja, torna possível a ocorrência da prescrição executória em que pese não haver qualquer inércia estatal. A Primeira Turma do Supremo Tribunal Federal, de outro modo, condiciona o curso inicial da aludida forma de prescrição ao trânsito em julgado para ambas as partes do processo, de modo que o termo inicial estaria vinculado à possibilidade de cumprimento do decreto condenatório. Por fim, pôde-se concluir que a discussão que envolve a temática possui grande importância, visando evitar a impunidade no âmbito do processo penal. Apontou-se, como forma de dirimir a problemática, associar o termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória ao trânsito em julgado para a acusação (critério legal) e à possibilidade de executar a reprimenda imposta (critério ligado à ideia básica de prescrição e ao princípio da actio nata). Por fim, consignou-se que cabe ao Plenário do Supremo Tribunal Federal pacificar a questão, vinculando os demais tribunais nacionais, não se olvidando para possíveis alterações legislativas que venham a influir no tema, consoante projetos de lei em trâmite no Congresso Nacional.Nunes, Mateus MedeirosSouza, João Francisco Mendes de2019-07-02T13:35:34Z2020-11-27T03:10:27Z2019-07-02T13:35:34Z2020-11-27T03:10:27Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis88application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5907Direito - TubarãoTubarão, Santa Catarina, BrasilAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-01T20:51:58Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5907Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-01T20:51:58Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
spellingShingle |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal Souza, João Francisco Mendes de Direito Penal Prescrição da pretensão executória Termo inicial |
title_short |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title_full |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title_fullStr |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title_full_unstemmed |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title_sort |
O termo inicial da prescrição da pretensão executória penal à luz da atual jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
author |
Souza, João Francisco Mendes de |
author_facet |
Souza, João Francisco Mendes de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Nunes, Mateus Medeiros |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, João Francisco Mendes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Penal Prescrição da pretensão executória Termo inicial |
topic |
Direito Penal Prescrição da pretensão executória Termo inicial |
description |
The main objective of this work is to formulate a proposal for the interpretation of the initial term of the prescriptive pretension, according to the rights conferred on the defendant in the Criminal Law and the basic precepts of the prescriptive institute. The method of deductive approach was used in the development of this study. The research, in relation to the level, is exploratory, using, more, the qualitative approach and the procedures of collection of bibliographic and documentary data. The results obtained point to the need to pacify the existing controversy around the initial term of the prescriptive pretension. It was verified that, with legislative and jurisprudential developments, it was possible to proceed with the condemnation execution of the conviction without, however, making it possible to comply. Thus, the State began to be punished for not exercising a claim without even being able to exercise it. The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, when interpreting article 112, item I, of the Penal Code, analyzes it in a literal way, that is, it makes possible the occurrence of the executory time limit in which there is no state inertia. The First Class of the Federal Supreme Court, otherwise, conditions the initial course of the aforementioned form of limitation of finality for the parties to the proceedings, so that the initial term would be linked to the possibility of complying with the condemnatory decree. Finally, it was possible to conclude that the discussion that surrounds the theme has great importance, aiming to avoid impunity in the criminal proceedings. It was pointed out, as a way of solving the problem, to associate the initial term from the time limit of the executory claim to the final res judicata to the prosecution (legal criterion) and to the possibility of executing the reprimand imposed (a criterion linked to the basic idea of prescriptive and to the principle of actio nata). Finally, it was stated that it is up to the Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court to pacify the issue, linking the other national courts, not forgetting for possible legislative changes that may influence the theme, according to draft legislation in progress in the National Congress. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-02T13:35:34Z 2019-07-02T13:35:34Z 2019 2020-11-27T03:10:27Z 2020-11-27T03:10:27Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5907 |
url |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5907 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito - Tubarão |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
88 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubarão, Santa Catarina, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415844378247168 |