Condenação dos honorários sucumbenciais ao requerente beneficiário da justiça gratuita na atual perspectiva da justiça do trabalho

• Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Paula Lazarim de
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5823
• topic: Direito processual; Acesso da justiça; Advogados – honorários

The purpose of the present study was to analyze if the condemnation in advocative hours for the beneficiaries of the free justice is in accordance with the constitucional principles that guide the labor relationships. Therefore, the method used was the qualitative form. The work had as a method of procedure the bibliographical researches, especially in doctrines and legislation. The studies showed that the statute nº 13.467 from 13 of July of 2017 brought to Labor Procedural Law innovations in the material and procedural field. The “Reforma Trabalhista”, as popularly known, inserted new hypotheses of incidence of the advocative hours through the art. 791-A of the “Consolidação das Leis Trabalhistas (CLT). To start an action in Labor Court imply expenses that often are inaccessible to most Brazilian workers, due to economic difficulties they face. The high cost to seek satisfaction of the evaded rights can lead to serious losses to the workers and their families. Based on the doctrine and legislation analyzed, the work concluded that the condemnation in advocatives hours for the beneficiaries of the free justice collides with the constitucional principle that guaranties the access to the justice of the hypossuficient worker, beside to directly injuring the principles that guide the Process, especially the procedural protectionism, so, according to the researcher, the article 791-A of the statute nº 13.467/2017, should be declared unconstitutional.