The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cepaluni,Gabriel
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Galdino,Manoel, Oliveira,Amâncio Jorge de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212012000200002
Resumo: What does it take to make a coalition successful? Bigger coalitions are more likely to be successful because the GATT/WTO is a consensus-based institution and countries are informally penalized if they isolate themselves. Through a Bayesian statistical analysis, the article corroborates the above hypothesis. To further investigate the research question, qualitative case studies of the G-10 in the Uruguay Round and the Public Health Coalition in the Doha Round are conducted. These cases show that the more convincing the framing of a position, the better are the chances of coalitions keeping a large number of followers and supporters, thereby affecting their odds of success. By building a unique database and applying a new research design to the topic, the study rigorously tests theories about coalitions that had previously only been proposed but not empirically analyzed.
id ABCP-1_2a345919e3da21ea09715f6b97238ab4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212012000200002
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTOinternational coalitionsbayesian analysismultilateralismeconomic opennessinternational negotiationsWhat does it take to make a coalition successful? Bigger coalitions are more likely to be successful because the GATT/WTO is a consensus-based institution and countries are informally penalized if they isolate themselves. Through a Bayesian statistical analysis, the article corroborates the above hypothesis. To further investigate the research question, qualitative case studies of the G-10 in the Uruguay Round and the Public Health Coalition in the Doha Round are conducted. These cases show that the more convincing the framing of a position, the better are the chances of coalitions keeping a large number of followers and supporters, thereby affecting their odds of success. By building a unique database and applying a new research design to the topic, the study rigorously tests theories about coalitions that had previously only been proposed but not empirically analyzed.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212012000200002Brazilian Political Science Review v.6 n.2 2012reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/S1981-38212012000200002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCepaluni,GabrielGaldino,ManoelOliveira,Amâncio Jorge deeng2013-08-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212012000200002Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2013-08-20T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
title The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
spellingShingle The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
Cepaluni,Gabriel
international coalitions
bayesian analysis
multilateralism
economic openness
international negotiations
title_short The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
title_full The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
title_fullStr The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
title_full_unstemmed The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
title_sort The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO
author Cepaluni,Gabriel
author_facet Cepaluni,Gabriel
Galdino,Manoel
Oliveira,Amâncio Jorge de
author_role author
author2 Galdino,Manoel
Oliveira,Amâncio Jorge de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cepaluni,Gabriel
Galdino,Manoel
Oliveira,Amâncio Jorge de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv international coalitions
bayesian analysis
multilateralism
economic openness
international negotiations
topic international coalitions
bayesian analysis
multilateralism
economic openness
international negotiations
description What does it take to make a coalition successful? Bigger coalitions are more likely to be successful because the GATT/WTO is a consensus-based institution and countries are informally penalized if they isolate themselves. Through a Bayesian statistical analysis, the article corroborates the above hypothesis. To further investigate the research question, qualitative case studies of the G-10 in the Uruguay Round and the Public Health Coalition in the Doha Round are conducted. These cases show that the more convincing the framing of a position, the better are the chances of coalitions keeping a large number of followers and supporters, thereby affecting their odds of success. By building a unique database and applying a new research design to the topic, the study rigorously tests theories about coalitions that had previously only been proposed but not empirically analyzed.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212012000200002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212012000200002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1981-38212012000200002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.6 n.2 2012
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302907826569216