Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Contexto Internacional |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000100313 |
Resumo: | Abstract This paper proposes an explanation to the domestic coalitions organised in Brazil around the FTAA negotiations, which stand as a hard case for the existing theories on political cleavages: industrialists and trade unions, albeit having shared common interests in the negotiations, did not adopt a joint strategy to foster their positions. The hypothesis to explain the political alignments in the FTAA is that the opening of the Brazilian market, which had advanced a lot in the years of negotiations, altered the priorities of workers and employers, as well as their preferences in foreign trade policy, hindering the reconciliation of class interests. Both agreed that the U.S. proposal for the FTAA was undesirable, but they completely disagreed on other issues that emerged in the political agenda during the reforms period, such as the role of the State in an open economy, the scope of labour and social rights and the social security system, the structure of taxation, etc. Some of the controversial issues were not new, but the international trade liberalisation intensified the dispute over them. |
id |
PUC_RIO-22_4ce2c158cd8afe063828b45bb0c1a115 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-85292016000100313 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RIO-22 |
network_name_str |
Contexto Internacional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian caseTrade NegotiationsForeign PolicyFree Trade Area of the AmericasDomestic CoalitionsPolitical CleavagesAbstract This paper proposes an explanation to the domestic coalitions organised in Brazil around the FTAA negotiations, which stand as a hard case for the existing theories on political cleavages: industrialists and trade unions, albeit having shared common interests in the negotiations, did not adopt a joint strategy to foster their positions. The hypothesis to explain the political alignments in the FTAA is that the opening of the Brazilian market, which had advanced a lot in the years of negotiations, altered the priorities of workers and employers, as well as their preferences in foreign trade policy, hindering the reconciliation of class interests. Both agreed that the U.S. proposal for the FTAA was undesirable, but they completely disagreed on other issues that emerged in the political agenda during the reforms period, such as the role of the State in an open economy, the scope of labour and social rights and the social security system, the structure of taxation, etc. Some of the controversial issues were not new, but the international trade liberalisation intensified the dispute over them.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000100313Contexto Internacional v.38 n.1 2016reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/S0102-8529.2016380100009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastelan,Danieleng2016-06-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292016000100313Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2016-06-16T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
title |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
spellingShingle |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case Castelan,Daniel Trade Negotiations Foreign Policy Free Trade Area of the Americas Domestic Coalitions Political Cleavages |
title_short |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
title_full |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
title_fullStr |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
title_full_unstemmed |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
title_sort |
Domestic coalitions in the FTAA negotiations: the Brazilian case |
author |
Castelan,Daniel |
author_facet |
Castelan,Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castelan,Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Trade Negotiations Foreign Policy Free Trade Area of the Americas Domestic Coalitions Political Cleavages |
topic |
Trade Negotiations Foreign Policy Free Trade Area of the Americas Domestic Coalitions Political Cleavages |
description |
Abstract This paper proposes an explanation to the domestic coalitions organised in Brazil around the FTAA negotiations, which stand as a hard case for the existing theories on political cleavages: industrialists and trade unions, albeit having shared common interests in the negotiations, did not adopt a joint strategy to foster their positions. The hypothesis to explain the political alignments in the FTAA is that the opening of the Brazilian market, which had advanced a lot in the years of negotiations, altered the priorities of workers and employers, as well as their preferences in foreign trade policy, hindering the reconciliation of class interests. Both agreed that the U.S. proposal for the FTAA was undesirable, but they completely disagreed on other issues that emerged in the political agenda during the reforms period, such as the role of the State in an open economy, the scope of labour and social rights and the social security system, the structure of taxation, etc. Some of the controversial issues were not new, but the international trade liberalisation intensified the dispute over them. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000100313 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000100313 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0102-8529.2016380100009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional v.38 n.1 2016 reponame:Contexto Internacional instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) instacron:PUC_RIO |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RIO |
institution |
PUC_RIO |
reponame_str |
Contexto Internacional |
collection |
Contexto Internacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br |
_version_ |
1752127872360775680 |