Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000300788 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the contribution of debriefing after clinical simulations for nursing students. Method: Quantitative study, conducted with 35 nursing students who participated in five clinical simulation scenarios with planned debriefings based on the model of the National League Nursing/Jeffries Simulation Theory. After the fifth scenario, students answered the Debriefing Evaluation Scale associated with the Simulation. Results: The items evaluated involved the psychosocial, cognitive, and affective values, and within a scale from one to five, the highest mean was found in cognitive value with 4.23 (±0.56) points, then in psychosocial value with 3.77 (±0.53), and finally in affective value with 3.71 (±0.63) points. Conclusion: The debriefing conducted after the clinical simulation scenarios was a reflective exercise that contributed to the student integrating multiple knowledges in affective, cognitive and psychosocial values, and thus develop the competencies required. |
id |
ABEN-1_a4da93a0c689c14a6ae91c1d8f74d3ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672019000300788 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional studySimulationThinkingClinical CompetenceLearningNursing StudentsABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the contribution of debriefing after clinical simulations for nursing students. Method: Quantitative study, conducted with 35 nursing students who participated in five clinical simulation scenarios with planned debriefings based on the model of the National League Nursing/Jeffries Simulation Theory. After the fifth scenario, students answered the Debriefing Evaluation Scale associated with the Simulation. Results: The items evaluated involved the psychosocial, cognitive, and affective values, and within a scale from one to five, the highest mean was found in cognitive value with 4.23 (±0.56) points, then in psychosocial value with 3.77 (±0.53), and finally in affective value with 3.71 (±0.63) points. Conclusion: The debriefing conducted after the clinical simulation scenarios was a reflective exercise that contributed to the student integrating multiple knowledges in affective, cognitive and psychosocial values, and thus develop the competencies required.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000300788Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.72 n.3 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBortolato-Major,CarinaMantovani,Maria de FátimaFelix,Jorge Vinícius CestariBoostel,RadamésSilva,Ângela Taís Mattei daCaravaca-Morera,Jaime Alonsoeng2019-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672019000300788Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2019-12-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
title |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
spellingShingle |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study Bortolato-Major,Carina Simulation Thinking Clinical Competence Learning Nursing Students |
title_short |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study |
author |
Bortolato-Major,Carina |
author_facet |
Bortolato-Major,Carina Mantovani,Maria de Fátima Felix,Jorge Vinícius Cestari Boostel,Radamés Silva,Ângela Taís Mattei da Caravaca-Morera,Jaime Alonso |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mantovani,Maria de Fátima Felix,Jorge Vinícius Cestari Boostel,Radamés Silva,Ângela Taís Mattei da Caravaca-Morera,Jaime Alonso |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bortolato-Major,Carina Mantovani,Maria de Fátima Felix,Jorge Vinícius Cestari Boostel,Radamés Silva,Ângela Taís Mattei da Caravaca-Morera,Jaime Alonso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Simulation Thinking Clinical Competence Learning Nursing Students |
topic |
Simulation Thinking Clinical Competence Learning Nursing Students |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the contribution of debriefing after clinical simulations for nursing students. Method: Quantitative study, conducted with 35 nursing students who participated in five clinical simulation scenarios with planned debriefings based on the model of the National League Nursing/Jeffries Simulation Theory. After the fifth scenario, students answered the Debriefing Evaluation Scale associated with the Simulation. Results: The items evaluated involved the psychosocial, cognitive, and affective values, and within a scale from one to five, the highest mean was found in cognitive value with 4.23 (±0.56) points, then in psychosocial value with 3.77 (±0.53), and finally in affective value with 3.71 (±0.63) points. Conclusion: The debriefing conducted after the clinical simulation scenarios was a reflective exercise that contributed to the student integrating multiple knowledges in affective, cognitive and psychosocial values, and thus develop the competencies required. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000300788 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000300788 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.72 n.3 2019 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303035961507840 |