A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matta,Cláudia Eliane da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bianchesi,Natália Maria Puggina, Oliveira,Milena Silva de, Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo, Leal,Fabiano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Production
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100705
Resumo: Abstract Paper aims This paper presents a comparative evaluation of different forecasting methods using two artificial neural networks (Multilayer Perceptron network and Radial Basis Functions Neural Network) and the Gaussian process regression. Originality Due to the current world scenario, solving economic problems has become extremely important. Artificial neural networks are one of the most promising tools to forecast economic trends and are being widely studied in economic analyses. Therefore, due to the concerns about the performance of different forecasting methods to solve economic problems, this study contributes with an example of the forecasting performance of artificial neural network models compared with Gaussian process regression using Nelson-Plosser and U.S. macroeconomic real-life data sets. Research method Two real-life data sets were used to evaluate the forecasting methods proposed in this paper. These data sets were normalised to values between zero and one. After that, the data training was performed and, once it was built, a model was used to generate forecasts. Thus, observations were made to verify how accurately the fitted model forecast the values. Main findings The results obtained from the study show that, for all forecasting horizons, multi-layer perceptron networks and Gaussian process regression models had the most satisfactory results. On the other hand, the radial basis functions neural network model was unsuitable for econometric data. Implications for theory and practice This study contributes to a discussion about artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models for econometric forecasting. Although artificial neural networks are mainly used in economic analyses, the results showed that not all models, such as radial basis functions neural networks, present good results. In addition, the regression of the Gaussian process showed promising results to forecast econometric data.
id ABEPRO-1_2325b85e596cc6d518a67c682dab833e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-65132021000100705
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-1
network_name_str Production
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series dataArtificial neural networksGaussian process regressionForecastingMacroeconomic seriesAbstract Paper aims This paper presents a comparative evaluation of different forecasting methods using two artificial neural networks (Multilayer Perceptron network and Radial Basis Functions Neural Network) and the Gaussian process regression. Originality Due to the current world scenario, solving economic problems has become extremely important. Artificial neural networks are one of the most promising tools to forecast economic trends and are being widely studied in economic analyses. Therefore, due to the concerns about the performance of different forecasting methods to solve economic problems, this study contributes with an example of the forecasting performance of artificial neural network models compared with Gaussian process regression using Nelson-Plosser and U.S. macroeconomic real-life data sets. Research method Two real-life data sets were used to evaluate the forecasting methods proposed in this paper. These data sets were normalised to values between zero and one. After that, the data training was performed and, once it was built, a model was used to generate forecasts. Thus, observations were made to verify how accurately the fitted model forecast the values. Main findings The results obtained from the study show that, for all forecasting horizons, multi-layer perceptron networks and Gaussian process regression models had the most satisfactory results. On the other hand, the radial basis functions neural network model was unsuitable for econometric data. Implications for theory and practice This study contributes to a discussion about artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models for econometric forecasting. Although artificial neural networks are mainly used in economic analyses, the results showed that not all models, such as radial basis functions neural networks, present good results. In addition, the regression of the Gaussian process showed promising results to forecast econometric data.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100705Production v.31 2021reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20210043info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatta,Cláudia Eliane daBianchesi,Natália Maria PugginaOliveira,Milena Silva deBalestrassi,Pedro PauloLeal,Fabianoeng2021-10-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132021000100705Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2021-10-07T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
title A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
spellingShingle A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
Matta,Cláudia Eliane da
Artificial neural networks
Gaussian process regression
Forecasting
Macroeconomic series
title_short A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
title_full A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
title_fullStr A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
title_sort A comparative study of forecasting methods using real-life econometric series data
author Matta,Cláudia Eliane da
author_facet Matta,Cláudia Eliane da
Bianchesi,Natália Maria Puggina
Oliveira,Milena Silva de
Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo
Leal,Fabiano
author_role author
author2 Bianchesi,Natália Maria Puggina
Oliveira,Milena Silva de
Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo
Leal,Fabiano
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matta,Cláudia Eliane da
Bianchesi,Natália Maria Puggina
Oliveira,Milena Silva de
Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo
Leal,Fabiano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artificial neural networks
Gaussian process regression
Forecasting
Macroeconomic series
topic Artificial neural networks
Gaussian process regression
Forecasting
Macroeconomic series
description Abstract Paper aims This paper presents a comparative evaluation of different forecasting methods using two artificial neural networks (Multilayer Perceptron network and Radial Basis Functions Neural Network) and the Gaussian process regression. Originality Due to the current world scenario, solving economic problems has become extremely important. Artificial neural networks are one of the most promising tools to forecast economic trends and are being widely studied in economic analyses. Therefore, due to the concerns about the performance of different forecasting methods to solve economic problems, this study contributes with an example of the forecasting performance of artificial neural network models compared with Gaussian process regression using Nelson-Plosser and U.S. macroeconomic real-life data sets. Research method Two real-life data sets were used to evaluate the forecasting methods proposed in this paper. These data sets were normalised to values between zero and one. After that, the data training was performed and, once it was built, a model was used to generate forecasts. Thus, observations were made to verify how accurately the fitted model forecast the values. Main findings The results obtained from the study show that, for all forecasting horizons, multi-layer perceptron networks and Gaussian process regression models had the most satisfactory results. On the other hand, the radial basis functions neural network model was unsuitable for econometric data. Implications for theory and practice This study contributes to a discussion about artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models for econometric forecasting. Although artificial neural networks are mainly used in economic analyses, the results showed that not all models, such as radial basis functions neural networks, present good results. In addition, the regression of the Gaussian process showed promising results to forecast econometric data.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100705
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6513.20210043
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Production v.31 2021
reponame:Production
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Production
collection Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||production@editoracubo.com.br
_version_ 1754213154832777216