Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Production |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100202 |
Resumo: | Abstract Paper aims The paper seeks to compare the performance of three layouts in a make to order (MTO) production system with high product variability. Originality No previous work sought to compare job shop, cellular and virtual cell layouts in an MTO system with high product variability, with just 21 resources, a low amount. The analysis considered models with the same capacities and demand for the three layouts. Research method The complete factorial design and ANOVA were used with simulation. The main effects plots of the control factors for response variables were obtained (e.g. throughput, lead time, and resource utilization). Main findings The virtual cell layout had results similar to the job shop, but achieved better outcomes compared with the traditional cell. Implications for theory and practice The knowledge gap regarding virtual cells signals the importance of this topic, as well as the possibilities not yet investigated about it in manufacturing companies. |
id |
ABEPRO-1_8ddbe15263d136e50d51258daa67e51b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-65132019000100202 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-1 |
network_name_str |
Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternativesVirtual cellsProcess plans with alternativesLayoutsSimulationDesign of experimentsAbstract Paper aims The paper seeks to compare the performance of three layouts in a make to order (MTO) production system with high product variability. Originality No previous work sought to compare job shop, cellular and virtual cell layouts in an MTO system with high product variability, with just 21 resources, a low amount. The analysis considered models with the same capacities and demand for the three layouts. Research method The complete factorial design and ANOVA were used with simulation. The main effects plots of the control factors for response variables were obtained (e.g. throughput, lead time, and resource utilization). Main findings The virtual cell layout had results similar to the job shop, but achieved better outcomes compared with the traditional cell. Implications for theory and practice The knowledge gap regarding virtual cells signals the importance of this topic, as well as the possibilities not yet investigated about it in manufacturing companies.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100202Production v.29 2019reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20180078info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDecker Junior,ClaudioFerreira,João Carlos EspíndolaHenning,ElisaPereira,Carla Robertaeng2019-02-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132019000100202Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2019-02-22T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
title |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives Decker Junior,Claudio Virtual cells Process plans with alternatives Layouts Simulation Design of experiments |
title_short |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
title_full |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
title_sort |
Assessment of shop floor layouts in the context of process plans with alternatives |
author |
Decker Junior,Claudio |
author_facet |
Decker Junior,Claudio Ferreira,João Carlos Espíndola Henning,Elisa Pereira,Carla Roberta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,João Carlos Espíndola Henning,Elisa Pereira,Carla Roberta |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Decker Junior,Claudio Ferreira,João Carlos Espíndola Henning,Elisa Pereira,Carla Roberta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Virtual cells Process plans with alternatives Layouts Simulation Design of experiments |
topic |
Virtual cells Process plans with alternatives Layouts Simulation Design of experiments |
description |
Abstract Paper aims The paper seeks to compare the performance of three layouts in a make to order (MTO) production system with high product variability. Originality No previous work sought to compare job shop, cellular and virtual cell layouts in an MTO system with high product variability, with just 21 resources, a low amount. The analysis considered models with the same capacities and demand for the three layouts. Research method The complete factorial design and ANOVA were used with simulation. The main effects plots of the control factors for response variables were obtained (e.g. throughput, lead time, and resource utilization). Main findings The virtual cell layout had results similar to the job shop, but achieved better outcomes compared with the traditional cell. Implications for theory and practice The knowledge gap regarding virtual cells signals the importance of this topic, as well as the possibilities not yet investigated about it in manufacturing companies. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100202 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6513.20180078 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Production v.29 2019 reponame:Production instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Production |
collection |
Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||production@editoracubo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754213154469969920 |