Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caten, Carla Schwengber ten
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Silva, Diego Souza, Aguiar, Rafael Barbosa, Silva Filho, Luiz Carlos Pinto, Huerta, Josep Miquel Piqué
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737
Resumo: Goal: To foster innovative and creative thinking in the curricula of Engineering schools, as well as other technology-based courses, contributing to the innovation ecosystems’ growth and sustainability. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was structured as an exploratory research and was conducted by means of a focus group comprised of representatives from Porto Alegre (RS) working directly with higher education and/or playing key roles within the city’s innovation ecosystem. The group’s discussion was analyzed along with current literature on the topic. Results: The paper provides insightful perceptions of the obstacles faced by faculty members when attempting to develop innovative methodologies within classes so that potential partnerships are fostered by agents of the innovation ecosystem in order to better prepare professionals that will later be inserted in this new innovative scenario. Limitations of the investigation: The present study is structured as an exploratory research based on a focus group discussion and analysis. Thus, as any qualitative approach, it might lack generalizability, once its purpose is to investigate a specific phenomenon and promote further investigation on the issue. However, all discussion from the focus group was analyzed and supported by extant literature on the topic, in order to mitigate such limitation and strengthen the research relevance. Practical implications: The analysis and discussion obtained from both the focus group and literature are imperative on the need of critical changes on universities’ organizational culture to support entrepreneurial activities, as well as fostering partnerships with key agents within innovation ecosystems to better prepare professionals to the new market setting. Originality/value: Although some studies investigate the relationship involving universities and Science and Technology Parks, few studies explore how engineering schools’ curricula can benefit from such alliances. Additionally, the present study lists a few hurdles faced by professors during the development of active-based practices, as well as alternative possibilities to overcome resistance in traditional courses.
id ABEPRO_3cf7b0f3ea0964c325d4851c2c91edf4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/737
network_acronym_str ABEPRO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behaviorEngineering EducationEntrepreneurshipInnovation EcosystemActive-Learning PracticesGoal: To foster innovative and creative thinking in the curricula of Engineering schools, as well as other technology-based courses, contributing to the innovation ecosystems’ growth and sustainability. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was structured as an exploratory research and was conducted by means of a focus group comprised of representatives from Porto Alegre (RS) working directly with higher education and/or playing key roles within the city’s innovation ecosystem. The group’s discussion was analyzed along with current literature on the topic. Results: The paper provides insightful perceptions of the obstacles faced by faculty members when attempting to develop innovative methodologies within classes so that potential partnerships are fostered by agents of the innovation ecosystem in order to better prepare professionals that will later be inserted in this new innovative scenario. Limitations of the investigation: The present study is structured as an exploratory research based on a focus group discussion and analysis. Thus, as any qualitative approach, it might lack generalizability, once its purpose is to investigate a specific phenomenon and promote further investigation on the issue. However, all discussion from the focus group was analyzed and supported by extant literature on the topic, in order to mitigate such limitation and strengthen the research relevance. Practical implications: The analysis and discussion obtained from both the focus group and literature are imperative on the need of critical changes on universities’ organizational culture to support entrepreneurial activities, as well as fostering partnerships with key agents within innovation ecosystems to better prepare professionals to the new market setting. Originality/value: Although some studies investigate the relationship involving universities and Science and Technology Parks, few studies explore how engineering schools’ curricula can benefit from such alliances. Additionally, the present study lists a few hurdles faced by professors during the development of active-based practices, as well as alternative possibilities to overcome resistance in traditional courses.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2019-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articletext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/73710.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a13Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019): March, 2019; 141-1482237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737/799https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737/801Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaten, Carla Schwengber tenSilva, Diego SouzaAguiar, Rafael BarbosaSilva Filho, Luiz Carlos PintoHuerta, Josep Miquel Piqué2021-07-13T14:14:22Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/737Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:21.081564Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
title Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
spellingShingle Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
Caten, Carla Schwengber ten
Engineering Education
Entrepreneurship
Innovation Ecosystem
Active-Learning Practices
title_short Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
title_full Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
title_fullStr Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
title_full_unstemmed Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
title_sort Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior
author Caten, Carla Schwengber ten
author_facet Caten, Carla Schwengber ten
Silva, Diego Souza
Aguiar, Rafael Barbosa
Silva Filho, Luiz Carlos Pinto
Huerta, Josep Miquel Piqué
author_role author
author2 Silva, Diego Souza
Aguiar, Rafael Barbosa
Silva Filho, Luiz Carlos Pinto
Huerta, Josep Miquel Piqué
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caten, Carla Schwengber ten
Silva, Diego Souza
Aguiar, Rafael Barbosa
Silva Filho, Luiz Carlos Pinto
Huerta, Josep Miquel Piqué
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Engineering Education
Entrepreneurship
Innovation Ecosystem
Active-Learning Practices
topic Engineering Education
Entrepreneurship
Innovation Ecosystem
Active-Learning Practices
description Goal: To foster innovative and creative thinking in the curricula of Engineering schools, as well as other technology-based courses, contributing to the innovation ecosystems’ growth and sustainability. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was structured as an exploratory research and was conducted by means of a focus group comprised of representatives from Porto Alegre (RS) working directly with higher education and/or playing key roles within the city’s innovation ecosystem. The group’s discussion was analyzed along with current literature on the topic. Results: The paper provides insightful perceptions of the obstacles faced by faculty members when attempting to develop innovative methodologies within classes so that potential partnerships are fostered by agents of the innovation ecosystem in order to better prepare professionals that will later be inserted in this new innovative scenario. Limitations of the investigation: The present study is structured as an exploratory research based on a focus group discussion and analysis. Thus, as any qualitative approach, it might lack generalizability, once its purpose is to investigate a specific phenomenon and promote further investigation on the issue. However, all discussion from the focus group was analyzed and supported by extant literature on the topic, in order to mitigate such limitation and strengthen the research relevance. Practical implications: The analysis and discussion obtained from both the focus group and literature are imperative on the need of critical changes on universities’ organizational culture to support entrepreneurial activities, as well as fostering partnerships with key agents within innovation ecosystems to better prepare professionals to the new market setting. Originality/value: Although some studies investigate the relationship involving universities and Science and Technology Parks, few studies explore how engineering schools’ curricula can benefit from such alliances. Additionally, the present study lists a few hurdles faced by professors during the development of active-based practices, as well as alternative possibilities to overcome resistance in traditional courses.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a13
url https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a13
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737/799
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/737/801
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019): March, 2019; 141-148
2237-8960
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjopm.journal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051461374312448