Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Horticultura Brasileira |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362009000400006 |
Resumo: | The use of cow urine can be considered an agricultural practice of low cost for farmers. Nevertheless, its efficiency on crop needs research information. The present research aimed to evaluate the effect of cow urine on the growth and yield of 'Regina 2000' lettuce, in an experiment carried out from January 13, 2006 to March 22, 2006. The experiment was set up with 12 treatments, in a split-plot design and four completely randomized blocks. The soil and leaf applications were installed in the plot. In the split-plot, cow urine was applied at different concentrations (0.00; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75; 1.00 and 1.25 %). The plot presented four rows with 1.75 m each, in 0.25 x 0.25 m spacing. The six central plants of the two central rows formed the sampled split-plot. At harvest, the following variables were evaluated: fresh (FLM) and dry (DLM) leaf mass, fresh (FSM) and dry (DSM) stem mass, stem length (SL), fresh (FRM) and dry (DRM) root mass, fresh (FHM) and dry (DHM) head mass and commercial yield (CY). The increase in cow urine concentrations increased the performance of all lettuce characteristics, except DRM, which presented reduction, and DSM and FRM, which were not affected. The highest yield was obtained with the concentration of 1.25% (17.00 t ha-1) applied to leaves and with 1.01% (14.92 t ha-1), applied to soil, corresponding, respectively to increases of 28.1% and 47.3%, in comparison to the control. Application to leaves, in comparison to application to soil, resulted in greater FLM (0.50 and 1.25%), SL (0.50; 0.75 and 1.25%), FSM and FRM (0.5%), FHM and CY (0.50 and 1.25%), but lower DSM and FRM (1.25%) and DRM (1.0 and 1.25%). The application of cow urine solution at 1.25% to leaves or 1.0% to soil is recommended for lettuce crops. |
id |
ABH-1_eb4e0d20ee661e16006ef415810594e2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-05362009000400006 |
network_acronym_str |
ABH-1 |
network_name_str |
Horticultura Brasileira |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urineLactuca sativaplant growthbiofertilizerThe use of cow urine can be considered an agricultural practice of low cost for farmers. Nevertheless, its efficiency on crop needs research information. The present research aimed to evaluate the effect of cow urine on the growth and yield of 'Regina 2000' lettuce, in an experiment carried out from January 13, 2006 to March 22, 2006. The experiment was set up with 12 treatments, in a split-plot design and four completely randomized blocks. The soil and leaf applications were installed in the plot. In the split-plot, cow urine was applied at different concentrations (0.00; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75; 1.00 and 1.25 %). The plot presented four rows with 1.75 m each, in 0.25 x 0.25 m spacing. The six central plants of the two central rows formed the sampled split-plot. At harvest, the following variables were evaluated: fresh (FLM) and dry (DLM) leaf mass, fresh (FSM) and dry (DSM) stem mass, stem length (SL), fresh (FRM) and dry (DRM) root mass, fresh (FHM) and dry (DHM) head mass and commercial yield (CY). The increase in cow urine concentrations increased the performance of all lettuce characteristics, except DRM, which presented reduction, and DSM and FRM, which were not affected. The highest yield was obtained with the concentration of 1.25% (17.00 t ha-1) applied to leaves and with 1.01% (14.92 t ha-1), applied to soil, corresponding, respectively to increases of 28.1% and 47.3%, in comparison to the control. Application to leaves, in comparison to application to soil, resulted in greater FLM (0.50 and 1.25%), SL (0.50; 0.75 and 1.25%), FSM and FRM (0.5%), FHM and CY (0.50 and 1.25%), but lower DSM and FRM (1.25%) and DRM (1.0 and 1.25%). The application of cow urine solution at 1.25% to leaves or 1.0% to soil is recommended for lettuce crops.Associação Brasileira de Horticultura2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362009000400006Horticultura Brasileira v.27 n.4 2009reponame:Horticultura Brasileirainstname:Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)instacron:ABH10.1590/S0102-05362009000400006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Nelson Licínio C dePuiatti,MárioSantos,Ricardo Henrique SCecon,Paulo RRodrigues,Pedro Henrique Reng2010-05-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-05362009000400006Revistahttp://cms.horticulturabrasileira.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||hortbras@gmail.com1806-99910102-0536opendoar:2010-05-17T00:00Horticultura Brasileira - Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
title |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
spellingShingle |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine Oliveira,Nelson Licínio C de Lactuca sativa plant growth biofertilizer |
title_short |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
title_full |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
title_fullStr |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
title_sort |
Soil and leaf fertilization of lettuce crop with cow urine |
author |
Oliveira,Nelson Licínio C de |
author_facet |
Oliveira,Nelson Licínio C de Puiatti,Mário Santos,Ricardo Henrique S Cecon,Paulo R Rodrigues,Pedro Henrique R |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Puiatti,Mário Santos,Ricardo Henrique S Cecon,Paulo R Rodrigues,Pedro Henrique R |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,Nelson Licínio C de Puiatti,Mário Santos,Ricardo Henrique S Cecon,Paulo R Rodrigues,Pedro Henrique R |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lactuca sativa plant growth biofertilizer |
topic |
Lactuca sativa plant growth biofertilizer |
description |
The use of cow urine can be considered an agricultural practice of low cost for farmers. Nevertheless, its efficiency on crop needs research information. The present research aimed to evaluate the effect of cow urine on the growth and yield of 'Regina 2000' lettuce, in an experiment carried out from January 13, 2006 to March 22, 2006. The experiment was set up with 12 treatments, in a split-plot design and four completely randomized blocks. The soil and leaf applications were installed in the plot. In the split-plot, cow urine was applied at different concentrations (0.00; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75; 1.00 and 1.25 %). The plot presented four rows with 1.75 m each, in 0.25 x 0.25 m spacing. The six central plants of the two central rows formed the sampled split-plot. At harvest, the following variables were evaluated: fresh (FLM) and dry (DLM) leaf mass, fresh (FSM) and dry (DSM) stem mass, stem length (SL), fresh (FRM) and dry (DRM) root mass, fresh (FHM) and dry (DHM) head mass and commercial yield (CY). The increase in cow urine concentrations increased the performance of all lettuce characteristics, except DRM, which presented reduction, and DSM and FRM, which were not affected. The highest yield was obtained with the concentration of 1.25% (17.00 t ha-1) applied to leaves and with 1.01% (14.92 t ha-1), applied to soil, corresponding, respectively to increases of 28.1% and 47.3%, in comparison to the control. Application to leaves, in comparison to application to soil, resulted in greater FLM (0.50 and 1.25%), SL (0.50; 0.75 and 1.25%), FSM and FRM (0.5%), FHM and CY (0.50 and 1.25%), but lower DSM and FRM (1.25%) and DRM (1.0 and 1.25%). The application of cow urine solution at 1.25% to leaves or 1.0% to soil is recommended for lettuce crops. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362009000400006 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362009000400006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0102-05362009000400006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Horticultura |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Horticultura |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Horticultura Brasileira v.27 n.4 2009 reponame:Horticultura Brasileira instname:Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH) instacron:ABH |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH) |
instacron_str |
ABH |
institution |
ABH |
reponame_str |
Horticultura Brasileira |
collection |
Horticultura Brasileira |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Horticultura Brasileira - Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||hortbras@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754213080350326784 |