Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423
Resumo: The aim of this work was to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, mechanical properties and fracture surface morphology of two different systems of glass infiltrated dental ceramic: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Alglass (Celmat) systems. Both materials were used to prepare bar-shaped specimens according to ISO 6872-1998. Three point flexural strength and Vickers microhardness through indentation tests were used to evaluate the samples. The samples surface fracture was achieved through SEM. The Results showed that In-Ceram Alumina presented higher flexural strength values (441.7 ± 54.1 MPa) than Alglass (287.8 ± 53.6 MPa). There was no significant statistic difference in microhardness Vickers results (1210,4 ± 90,0 HV; 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV) between two groups, respectively. In-Ceram Alumina had more homogeneity and less pores at fracture surface than the Alglass. However, Alglass has reduced costs in relation to In-Ceram Alumina and reached the ISO 6872-1998 standard requirements, by this mean this material can be considered to be used clinically used.
id ABO-1_b05c030f8db1ff10dce6c5695ec4b040
oai_identifier_str oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/423
network_acronym_str ABO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systemsAnálise da resistência flexural e microdureza de dois sistemas de cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada por vidroMEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV.The aim of this work was to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, mechanical properties and fracture surface morphology of two different systems of glass infiltrated dental ceramic: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Alglass (Celmat) systems. Both materials were used to prepare bar-shaped specimens according to ISO 6872-1998. Three point flexural strength and Vickers microhardness through indentation tests were used to evaluate the samples. The samples surface fracture was achieved through SEM. The Results showed that In-Ceram Alumina presented higher flexural strength values (441.7 ± 54.1 MPa) than Alglass (287.8 ± 53.6 MPa). There was no significant statistic difference in microhardness Vickers results (1210,4 ± 90,0 HV; 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV) between two groups, respectively. In-Ceram Alumina had more homogeneity and less pores at fracture surface than the Alglass. However, Alglass has reduced costs in relation to In-Ceram Alumina and reached the ISO 6872-1998 standard requirements, by this mean this material can be considered to be used clinically used.O estudo avaliou in vitro a resistência flexural e a microdureza de dois sistemas de cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada por vidro: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) e Alglass (Celmat). Foram testados corpos de prova em forma de barra, conforme a ISO 6872-1998, foram testados em ensaios de resistência flexural de três pontos e microdureza Vickers, por indentação. Analisou-se a superfície de fratura dos corpos por MEV. In-Ceram Alumina apresentou maior resistência à flexão (441,7 ± 54,1 MPa) que o Alglass (287,8 ± 53,6 MPa). Os sistemas não apresentaram diferença estatística para microdureza: 1210,4 ± 90,0 HV e 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV, respectivamente. In-Ceram Alumina apresentou na superfície de fratura maior homogeneidade e menor número de poros que o Alglass. O Alglass, com custo reduzido comparado ao In-Ceram Alumina, atendeu à ISO 6872-1998 podendo ser empregado clinicamenteAssociação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro2013-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa de laboratórioapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/42310.18363/rbo.v69n2.p.148Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 148Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 1481984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOporhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423/329ContemporãneaDireitos autorais 2016 Revistasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFigueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de2013-07-22T15:16:41Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/423Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2013-07-22T15:16:41Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
Análise da resistência flexural e microdureza de dois sistemas de cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada por vidro
title Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
spellingShingle Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV.
title_short Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
title_full Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
title_fullStr Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
title_sort Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
author Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de
author_facet Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV.
topic MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV.
description The aim of this work was to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, mechanical properties and fracture surface morphology of two different systems of glass infiltrated dental ceramic: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Alglass (Celmat) systems. Both materials were used to prepare bar-shaped specimens according to ISO 6872-1998. Three point flexural strength and Vickers microhardness through indentation tests were used to evaluate the samples. The samples surface fracture was achieved through SEM. The Results showed that In-Ceram Alumina presented higher flexural strength values (441.7 ± 54.1 MPa) than Alglass (287.8 ± 53.6 MPa). There was no significant statistic difference in microhardness Vickers results (1210,4 ± 90,0 HV; 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV) between two groups, respectively. In-Ceram Alumina had more homogeneity and less pores at fracture surface than the Alglass. However, Alglass has reduced costs in relation to In-Ceram Alumina and reached the ISO 6872-1998 standard requirements, by this mean this material can be considered to be used clinically used.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa de laboratório
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423
10.18363/rbo.v69n2.p.148
url https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423
identifier_str_mv 10.18363/rbo.v69n2.p.148
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423/329
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Contemporãnea
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 148
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 148
1984-3747
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron:ABO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron_str ABO
institution ABO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai
_version_ 1798313205324316672