Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423 |
Resumo: | The aim of this work was to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, mechanical properties and fracture surface morphology of two different systems of glass infiltrated dental ceramic: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Alglass (Celmat) systems. Both materials were used to prepare bar-shaped specimens according to ISO 6872-1998. Three point flexural strength and Vickers microhardness through indentation tests were used to evaluate the samples. The samples surface fracture was achieved through SEM. The Results showed that In-Ceram Alumina presented higher flexural strength values (441.7 ± 54.1 MPa) than Alglass (287.8 ± 53.6 MPa). There was no significant statistic difference in microhardness Vickers results (1210,4 ± 90,0 HV; 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV) between two groups, respectively. In-Ceram Alumina had more homogeneity and less pores at fracture surface than the Alglass. However, Alglass has reduced costs in relation to In-Ceram Alumina and reached the ISO 6872-1998 standard requirements, by this mean this material can be considered to be used clinically used. |
id |
ABO-1_b05c030f8db1ff10dce6c5695ec4b040 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/423 |
network_acronym_str |
ABO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systemsAnálise da resistência flexural e microdureza de dois sistemas de cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada por vidroMEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV.The aim of this work was to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, mechanical properties and fracture surface morphology of two different systems of glass infiltrated dental ceramic: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Alglass (Celmat) systems. Both materials were used to prepare bar-shaped specimens according to ISO 6872-1998. Three point flexural strength and Vickers microhardness through indentation tests were used to evaluate the samples. The samples surface fracture was achieved through SEM. The Results showed that In-Ceram Alumina presented higher flexural strength values (441.7 ± 54.1 MPa) than Alglass (287.8 ± 53.6 MPa). There was no significant statistic difference in microhardness Vickers results (1210,4 ± 90,0 HV; 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV) between two groups, respectively. In-Ceram Alumina had more homogeneity and less pores at fracture surface than the Alglass. However, Alglass has reduced costs in relation to In-Ceram Alumina and reached the ISO 6872-1998 standard requirements, by this mean this material can be considered to be used clinically used.O estudo avaliou in vitro a resistência flexural e a microdureza de dois sistemas de cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada por vidro: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) e Alglass (Celmat). Foram testados corpos de prova em forma de barra, conforme a ISO 6872-1998, foram testados em ensaios de resistência flexural de três pontos e microdureza Vickers, por indentação. Analisou-se a superfície de fratura dos corpos por MEV. In-Ceram Alumina apresentou maior resistência à flexão (441,7 ± 54,1 MPa) que o Alglass (287,8 ± 53,6 MPa). Os sistemas não apresentaram diferença estatística para microdureza: 1210,4 ± 90,0 HV e 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV, respectivamente. In-Ceram Alumina apresentou na superfície de fratura maior homogeneidade e menor número de poros que o Alglass. O Alglass, com custo reduzido comparado ao In-Ceram Alumina, atendeu à ISO 6872-1998 podendo ser empregado clinicamenteAssociação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro2013-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa de laboratórioapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/42310.18363/rbo.v69n2.p.148Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 148Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 1481984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOporhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423/329ContemporãneaDireitos autorais 2016 Revistasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFigueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de2013-07-22T15:16:41Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/423Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2013-07-22T15:16:41Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems Análise da resistência flexural e microdureza de dois sistemas de cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada por vidro |
title |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA) Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV. |
title_short |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems |
title_full |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems |
title_sort |
Analysis of flexural strength and microhardness of two alumina glass infiltrated ceramic systems |
author |
Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de |
author_facet |
Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Figueiredo Filho, Basílio Pires de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA) Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV. |
topic |
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA) Prótese; In-Ceram Alumina; Alglass; Resistência flexural; Microdureza; MEV. |
description |
The aim of this work was to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, mechanical properties and fracture surface morphology of two different systems of glass infiltrated dental ceramic: In-Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Alglass (Celmat) systems. Both materials were used to prepare bar-shaped specimens according to ISO 6872-1998. Three point flexural strength and Vickers microhardness through indentation tests were used to evaluate the samples. The samples surface fracture was achieved through SEM. The Results showed that In-Ceram Alumina presented higher flexural strength values (441.7 ± 54.1 MPa) than Alglass (287.8 ± 53.6 MPa). There was no significant statistic difference in microhardness Vickers results (1210,4 ± 90,0 HV; 1135,6 ± 117,5 HV) between two groups, respectively. In-Ceram Alumina had more homogeneity and less pores at fracture surface than the Alglass. However, Alglass has reduced costs in relation to In-Ceram Alumina and reached the ISO 6872-1998 standard requirements, by this mean this material can be considered to be used clinically used. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-07-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa de laboratório |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423 10.18363/rbo.v69n2.p.148 |
url |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18363/rbo.v69n2.p.148 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/423/329 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Contemporãnea |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 148 Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 69, n. 2 (2012); 148 1984-3747 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) instacron:ABO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
instacron_str |
ABO |
institution |
ABO |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai |
_version_ |
1798313205324316672 |