Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200162 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction: The frequency modulation system is a device that helps to improve speech perception in noise and is considered the most beneficial approach to improve speech recognition in noise in cochlear implant users. According to guidelines, there is a need to perform a check before fitting the frequency modulation system. Although there are recommendations regarding the behavioral tests that should be performed at the fitting of the frequency modulation system to cochlear implant users, there are no published recommendations regarding the electroacoustic test that should be performed. Objective: Perform and determine the validity of an electroacoustic verification test for frequency modulation systems coupled to different cochlear implant speech processors. Methods: The sample included 40 participants between 5 and 18 year's users of four different models of speech processors. For the electroacoustic evaluation, we used the Audioscan Verifit device with the HA-1 coupler and the listening check devices corresponding to each speech processor model. In cases where the transparency was not achieved, a modification was made in the frequency modulation gain adjustment and we used the Brazilian version of the "Phrases in Noise Test" to evaluate the speech perception in competitive noise. Results: It was observed that there was transparency between the frequency modulation system and the cochlear implant in 85% of the participants evaluated. After adjusting the gain of the frequency modulation receiver in the other participants, the devices showed transparency when the electroacoustic verification test was repeated. It was also observed that patients demonstrated better performance in speech perception in noise after a new adjustment, that is, in these cases; the electroacoustic transparency caused behavioral transparency. Conclusion: The electroacoustic evaluation protocol suggested was effective in evaluation of transparency between the frequency modulation system and the cochlear implant. Performing the adjustment of the speech processor and the frequency modulation system gain are essential when fitting this device. |
id |
ABORL-F-1_2a5e7c559462fc6320a5197b97a69be6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-86942019000200162 |
network_acronym_str |
ABORL-F-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant usersCochlear implantAssistive technologySpeech perceptionPediatricAbstract Introduction: The frequency modulation system is a device that helps to improve speech perception in noise and is considered the most beneficial approach to improve speech recognition in noise in cochlear implant users. According to guidelines, there is a need to perform a check before fitting the frequency modulation system. Although there are recommendations regarding the behavioral tests that should be performed at the fitting of the frequency modulation system to cochlear implant users, there are no published recommendations regarding the electroacoustic test that should be performed. Objective: Perform and determine the validity of an electroacoustic verification test for frequency modulation systems coupled to different cochlear implant speech processors. Methods: The sample included 40 participants between 5 and 18 year's users of four different models of speech processors. For the electroacoustic evaluation, we used the Audioscan Verifit device with the HA-1 coupler and the listening check devices corresponding to each speech processor model. In cases where the transparency was not achieved, a modification was made in the frequency modulation gain adjustment and we used the Brazilian version of the "Phrases in Noise Test" to evaluate the speech perception in competitive noise. Results: It was observed that there was transparency between the frequency modulation system and the cochlear implant in 85% of the participants evaluated. After adjusting the gain of the frequency modulation receiver in the other participants, the devices showed transparency when the electroacoustic verification test was repeated. It was also observed that patients demonstrated better performance in speech perception in noise after a new adjustment, that is, in these cases; the electroacoustic transparency caused behavioral transparency. Conclusion: The electroacoustic evaluation protocol suggested was effective in evaluation of transparency between the frequency modulation system and the cochlear implant. Performing the adjustment of the speech processor and the frequency modulation system gain are essential when fitting this device.Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200162Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.85 n.2 2019reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)instacron:ABORL-CCF10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.11.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFidêncio,Vanessa Luisa DestroJacob,Regina Tangerino de SouzaTanamati,Liége FranziniBucuvic,Érika CristinaMoret,Adriane Lima Mortarieng2019-04-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-86942019000200162Revistahttp://www.bjorl.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br1808-86861808-8686opendoar:2019-04-24T00:00Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
title |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
spellingShingle |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users Fidêncio,Vanessa Luisa Destro Cochlear implant Assistive technology Speech perception Pediatric |
title_short |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
title_full |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
title_fullStr |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
title_sort |
Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users |
author |
Fidêncio,Vanessa Luisa Destro |
author_facet |
Fidêncio,Vanessa Luisa Destro Jacob,Regina Tangerino de Souza Tanamati,Liége Franzini Bucuvic,Érika Cristina Moret,Adriane Lima Mortari |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jacob,Regina Tangerino de Souza Tanamati,Liége Franzini Bucuvic,Érika Cristina Moret,Adriane Lima Mortari |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fidêncio,Vanessa Luisa Destro Jacob,Regina Tangerino de Souza Tanamati,Liége Franzini Bucuvic,Érika Cristina Moret,Adriane Lima Mortari |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cochlear implant Assistive technology Speech perception Pediatric |
topic |
Cochlear implant Assistive technology Speech perception Pediatric |
description |
Abstract Introduction: The frequency modulation system is a device that helps to improve speech perception in noise and is considered the most beneficial approach to improve speech recognition in noise in cochlear implant users. According to guidelines, there is a need to perform a check before fitting the frequency modulation system. Although there are recommendations regarding the behavioral tests that should be performed at the fitting of the frequency modulation system to cochlear implant users, there are no published recommendations regarding the electroacoustic test that should be performed. Objective: Perform and determine the validity of an electroacoustic verification test for frequency modulation systems coupled to different cochlear implant speech processors. Methods: The sample included 40 participants between 5 and 18 year's users of four different models of speech processors. For the electroacoustic evaluation, we used the Audioscan Verifit device with the HA-1 coupler and the listening check devices corresponding to each speech processor model. In cases where the transparency was not achieved, a modification was made in the frequency modulation gain adjustment and we used the Brazilian version of the "Phrases in Noise Test" to evaluate the speech perception in competitive noise. Results: It was observed that there was transparency between the frequency modulation system and the cochlear implant in 85% of the participants evaluated. After adjusting the gain of the frequency modulation receiver in the other participants, the devices showed transparency when the electroacoustic verification test was repeated. It was also observed that patients demonstrated better performance in speech perception in noise after a new adjustment, that is, in these cases; the electroacoustic transparency caused behavioral transparency. Conclusion: The electroacoustic evaluation protocol suggested was effective in evaluation of transparency between the frequency modulation system and the cochlear implant. Performing the adjustment of the speech processor and the frequency modulation system gain are essential when fitting this device. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200162 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200162 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.11.001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.85 n.2 2019 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology instname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF) instacron:ABORL-CCF |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF) |
instacron_str |
ABORL-CCF |
institution |
ABORL-CCF |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br |
_version_ |
1754575993293504512 |