Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The present study correlated fine motor function (FMF) and sensory function (SF) performance with magnetic resonance imaging classification, in cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. METHOD: Specific protocols were used to evaluate FMF, SF and brain lesion extent and location in the hemisphere. Forty-six patients were assessed: 23 with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (group 1) and 23 normal individuals (group 2). Their ages ranged from 7 to 16 years, with a mean of 12 years and 8 months. RESULTS: FMF and SF performance in group 1 was significantly worse than in group 2. Hemiparetic cerebral palsy cases with lesions in only one brain structure presented better results than those with two or more damaged structures larger than 10 mm. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cortical and subcortical impairment presented worse performance than those with subcortical lesions. CONCLUSION: Motor and sensory dysfunctions need to be identified and understood in order to provide routine training and special care for such children. |
id |
ABRA-FT-1_0e669c27a1861fbb7f498e15b2b95359 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-35552006000200004 |
network_acronym_str |
ABRA-FT-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimagingcerebral palsyneuroimagingfine motor functionsensory functionOBJECTIVE: The present study correlated fine motor function (FMF) and sensory function (SF) performance with magnetic resonance imaging classification, in cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. METHOD: Specific protocols were used to evaluate FMF, SF and brain lesion extent and location in the hemisphere. Forty-six patients were assessed: 23 with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (group 1) and 23 normal individuals (group 2). Their ages ranged from 7 to 16 years, with a mean of 12 years and 8 months. RESULTS: FMF and SF performance in group 1 was significantly worse than in group 2. Hemiparetic cerebral palsy cases with lesions in only one brain structure presented better results than those with two or more damaged structures larger than 10 mm. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cortical and subcortical impairment presented worse performance than those with subcortical lesions. CONCLUSION: Motor and sensory dysfunctions need to be identified and understood in order to provide routine training and special care for such children.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.10 n.2 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/S1413-35552006000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTurolla de Souza,RCCiasca,SMMoura-Ribeiro,MVLZanardi,VAeng2006-08-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552006000200004Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2006-08-21T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
title |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
spellingShingle |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging Turolla de Souza,RC cerebral palsy neuroimaging fine motor function sensory function |
title_short |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
title_full |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
title_fullStr |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
title_sort |
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging |
author |
Turolla de Souza,RC |
author_facet |
Turolla de Souza,RC Ciasca,SM Moura-Ribeiro,MVL Zanardi,VA |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ciasca,SM Moura-Ribeiro,MVL Zanardi,VA |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Turolla de Souza,RC Ciasca,SM Moura-Ribeiro,MVL Zanardi,VA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cerebral palsy neuroimaging fine motor function sensory function |
topic |
cerebral palsy neuroimaging fine motor function sensory function |
description |
OBJECTIVE: The present study correlated fine motor function (FMF) and sensory function (SF) performance with magnetic resonance imaging classification, in cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. METHOD: Specific protocols were used to evaluate FMF, SF and brain lesion extent and location in the hemisphere. Forty-six patients were assessed: 23 with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (group 1) and 23 normal individuals (group 2). Their ages ranged from 7 to 16 years, with a mean of 12 years and 8 months. RESULTS: FMF and SF performance in group 1 was significantly worse than in group 2. Hemiparetic cerebral palsy cases with lesions in only one brain structure presented better results than those with two or more damaged structures larger than 10 mm. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cortical and subcortical impairment presented worse performance than those with subcortical lesions. CONCLUSION: Motor and sensory dysfunctions need to be identified and understood in order to provide routine training and special care for such children. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1413-35552006000200004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.10 n.2 2006 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) instacron:ABRAPG-FT |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) |
instacron_str |
ABRAPG-FT |
institution |
ABRAPG-FT |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br |
_version_ |
1754575946577346560 |