Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Turolla de Souza,RC
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Ciasca,SM, Moura-Ribeiro,MVL, Zanardi,VA
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The present study correlated fine motor function (FMF) and sensory function (SF) performance with magnetic resonance imaging classification, in cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. METHOD: Specific protocols were used to evaluate FMF, SF and brain lesion extent and location in the hemisphere. Forty-six patients were assessed: 23 with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (group 1) and 23 normal individuals (group 2). Their ages ranged from 7 to 16 years, with a mean of 12 years and 8 months. RESULTS: FMF and SF performance in group 1 was significantly worse than in group 2. Hemiparetic cerebral palsy cases with lesions in only one brain structure presented better results than those with two or more damaged structures larger than 10 mm. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cortical and subcortical impairment presented worse performance than those with subcortical lesions. CONCLUSION: Motor and sensory dysfunctions need to be identified and understood in order to provide routine training and special care for such children.
id ABRA-FT-1_0e669c27a1861fbb7f498e15b2b95359
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-35552006000200004
network_acronym_str ABRA-FT-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository_id_str
spelling Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimagingcerebral palsyneuroimagingfine motor functionsensory functionOBJECTIVE: The present study correlated fine motor function (FMF) and sensory function (SF) performance with magnetic resonance imaging classification, in cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. METHOD: Specific protocols were used to evaluate FMF, SF and brain lesion extent and location in the hemisphere. Forty-six patients were assessed: 23 with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (group 1) and 23 normal individuals (group 2). Their ages ranged from 7 to 16 years, with a mean of 12 years and 8 months. RESULTS: FMF and SF performance in group 1 was significantly worse than in group 2. Hemiparetic cerebral palsy cases with lesions in only one brain structure presented better results than those with two or more damaged structures larger than 10 mm. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cortical and subcortical impairment presented worse performance than those with subcortical lesions. CONCLUSION: Motor and sensory dysfunctions need to be identified and understood in order to provide routine training and special care for such children.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.10 n.2 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/S1413-35552006000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTurolla de Souza,RCCiasca,SMMoura-Ribeiro,MVLZanardi,VAeng2006-08-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552006000200004Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2006-08-21T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
title Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
spellingShingle Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
Turolla de Souza,RC
cerebral palsy
neuroimaging
fine motor function
sensory function
title_short Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
title_full Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
title_fullStr Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
title_full_unstemmed Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
title_sort Hemiparetic cerebral palsy: clinical data compared with neuroimaging
author Turolla de Souza,RC
author_facet Turolla de Souza,RC
Ciasca,SM
Moura-Ribeiro,MVL
Zanardi,VA
author_role author
author2 Ciasca,SM
Moura-Ribeiro,MVL
Zanardi,VA
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Turolla de Souza,RC
Ciasca,SM
Moura-Ribeiro,MVL
Zanardi,VA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cerebral palsy
neuroimaging
fine motor function
sensory function
topic cerebral palsy
neuroimaging
fine motor function
sensory function
description OBJECTIVE: The present study correlated fine motor function (FMF) and sensory function (SF) performance with magnetic resonance imaging classification, in cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. METHOD: Specific protocols were used to evaluate FMF, SF and brain lesion extent and location in the hemisphere. Forty-six patients were assessed: 23 with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (group 1) and 23 normal individuals (group 2). Their ages ranged from 7 to 16 years, with a mean of 12 years and 8 months. RESULTS: FMF and SF performance in group 1 was significantly worse than in group 2. Hemiparetic cerebral palsy cases with lesions in only one brain structure presented better results than those with two or more damaged structures larger than 10 mm. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cortical and subcortical impairment presented worse performance than those with subcortical lesions. CONCLUSION: Motor and sensory dysfunctions need to be identified and understood in order to provide routine training and special care for such children.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552006000200004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-35552006000200004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.10 n.2 2006
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron:ABRAPG-FT
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron_str ABRAPG-FT
institution ABRAPG-FT
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
collection Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br
_version_ 1754575946577346560