IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001 |
Resumo: | Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections. |
id |
ABRASCO-2_def8ddaed7d655661b22b2a87b5c7785 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-81232017021204001 |
network_acronym_str |
ABRASCO-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisHuman leptospirosisIgM ELISALeptospirosis diagnosisMeta-analysisAbstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.22 n.12 2017reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)instacron:ABRASCO10.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosa,Maria InesReis,Maria Fernandes dosSimon,CarlaDondossola,EduardoAlexandre,Maria CecíliaColonetti,TamyMeller,Fernanda Oliveiraeng2017-12-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-81232017021204001Revistahttp://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br1678-45611413-8123opendoar:2017-12-18T00:00Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rosa,Maria Ines Human leptospirosis IgM ELISA Leptospirosis diagnosis Meta-analysis |
title_short |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Rosa,Maria Ines |
author_facet |
Rosa,Maria Ines Reis,Maria Fernandes dos Simon,Carla Dondossola,Eduardo Alexandre,Maria Cecília Colonetti,Tamy Meller,Fernanda Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis,Maria Fernandes dos Simon,Carla Dondossola,Eduardo Alexandre,Maria Cecília Colonetti,Tamy Meller,Fernanda Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosa,Maria Ines Reis,Maria Fernandes dos Simon,Carla Dondossola,Eduardo Alexandre,Maria Cecília Colonetti,Tamy Meller,Fernanda Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Human leptospirosis IgM ELISA Leptospirosis diagnosis Meta-analysis |
topic |
Human leptospirosis IgM ELISA Leptospirosis diagnosis Meta-analysis |
description |
Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.22 n.12 2017 reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO) instacron:ABRASCO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO) |
instacron_str |
ABRASCO |
institution |
ABRASCO |
reponame_str |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
collection |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1754213041335959552 |