IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa,Maria Ines
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Reis,Maria Fernandes dos, Simon,Carla, Dondossola,Eduardo, Alexandre,Maria Cecília, Colonetti,Tamy, Meller,Fernanda Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001
Resumo: Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.
id ABRASCO-2_def8ddaed7d655661b22b2a87b5c7785
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-81232017021204001
network_acronym_str ABRASCO-2
network_name_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisHuman leptospirosisIgM ELISALeptospirosis diagnosisMeta-analysisAbstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.22 n.12 2017reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)instacron:ABRASCO10.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosa,Maria InesReis,Maria Fernandes dosSimon,CarlaDondossola,EduardoAlexandre,Maria CecíliaColonetti,TamyMeller,Fernanda Oliveiraeng2017-12-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-81232017021204001Revistahttp://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br1678-45611413-8123opendoar:2017-12-18T00:00Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rosa,Maria Ines
Human leptospirosis
IgM ELISA
Leptospirosis diagnosis
Meta-analysis
title_short IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Rosa,Maria Ines
author_facet Rosa,Maria Ines
Reis,Maria Fernandes dos
Simon,Carla
Dondossola,Eduardo
Alexandre,Maria Cecília
Colonetti,Tamy
Meller,Fernanda Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Reis,Maria Fernandes dos
Simon,Carla
Dondossola,Eduardo
Alexandre,Maria Cecília
Colonetti,Tamy
Meller,Fernanda Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa,Maria Ines
Reis,Maria Fernandes dos
Simon,Carla
Dondossola,Eduardo
Alexandre,Maria Cecília
Colonetti,Tamy
Meller,Fernanda Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Human leptospirosis
IgM ELISA
Leptospirosis diagnosis
Meta-analysis
topic Human leptospirosis
IgM ELISA
Leptospirosis diagnosis
Meta-analysis
description Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017021204001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.22 n.12 2017
reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron:ABRASCO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron_str ABRASCO
institution ABRASCO
reponame_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
collection Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754213041335959552