Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra,Artur Lício Rocha
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Batista,Thales Paulo, Martins,Mário Rino, Carneiro,Vandré Cabral Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000600571
Resumo: Objective: the main aim of this study was to describe the authors’ experience with the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer without systematic lymphadenectomy. Methods: a retrospective cohort study was carried out on a subset of patients suffering of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy without systematic (radical) lymph nodes dissection at our centers from June, 2002, to November, 2011. Descriptive statistics were explored as medians (interquartile range) or frequencies (percentages), as appropriated, and the Kaplan–Meier method was applied for survival estimation. Results: eighty-three patients who underwent surgical treatment with no lymph node dissection (n = 20; 24.1%) or with only a sampling procedure (n=63; 75.98%) were selected for analysis. Among these patients, 27 (32.53%) underwent surgery alone and 56 (67.46%) received some adjuvant treatment. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients (6.02%). Over a median follow-up of 27.4 months (Q25 = 13.7 – Q75 = 46.5), 15 (18.07%) patients suffered from relapses and 11 deaths occurred as result of disease recurrence. Cumulative 1, 2 and 3-year disease- free survivals were 97.32, 91.18 and 78.02%, respectively. Conclusion: on a case-by-case basis, the surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy did not seem to decrease survival outcomes and presented low rates of surgical morbidity in our experience, but was also related to a high rate use of adjuvant therapy.
id AMB-1_054eeb41bb9bacc6443657eb99791add
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302014000600571
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomyendometrial neoplasmssurvival analysislymph node dissection Objective: the main aim of this study was to describe the authors’ experience with the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer without systematic lymphadenectomy. Methods: a retrospective cohort study was carried out on a subset of patients suffering of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy without systematic (radical) lymph nodes dissection at our centers from June, 2002, to November, 2011. Descriptive statistics were explored as medians (interquartile range) or frequencies (percentages), as appropriated, and the Kaplan–Meier method was applied for survival estimation. Results: eighty-three patients who underwent surgical treatment with no lymph node dissection (n = 20; 24.1%) or with only a sampling procedure (n=63; 75.98%) were selected for analysis. Among these patients, 27 (32.53%) underwent surgery alone and 56 (67.46%) received some adjuvant treatment. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients (6.02%). Over a median follow-up of 27.4 months (Q25 = 13.7 – Q75 = 46.5), 15 (18.07%) patients suffered from relapses and 11 deaths occurred as result of disease recurrence. Cumulative 1, 2 and 3-year disease- free survivals were 97.32, 91.18 and 78.02%, respectively. Conclusion: on a case-by-case basis, the surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy did not seem to decrease survival outcomes and presented low rates of surgical morbidity in our experience, but was also related to a high rate use of adjuvant therapy. Associação Médica Brasileira2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000600571Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.60 n.6 2014reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.60.06.017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra,Artur Lício RochaBatista,Thales PauloMartins,Mário RinoCarneiro,Vandré Cabral Gomeseng2015-01-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302014000600571Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2015-01-26T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
title Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
spellingShingle Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
Bezerra,Artur Lício Rocha
endometrial neoplasms
survival analysis
lymph node dissection
title_short Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
title_full Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
title_sort Surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy
author Bezerra,Artur Lício Rocha
author_facet Bezerra,Artur Lício Rocha
Batista,Thales Paulo
Martins,Mário Rino
Carneiro,Vandré Cabral Gomes
author_role author
author2 Batista,Thales Paulo
Martins,Mário Rino
Carneiro,Vandré Cabral Gomes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra,Artur Lício Rocha
Batista,Thales Paulo
Martins,Mário Rino
Carneiro,Vandré Cabral Gomes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv endometrial neoplasms
survival analysis
lymph node dissection
topic endometrial neoplasms
survival analysis
lymph node dissection
description Objective: the main aim of this study was to describe the authors’ experience with the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer without systematic lymphadenectomy. Methods: a retrospective cohort study was carried out on a subset of patients suffering of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy without systematic (radical) lymph nodes dissection at our centers from June, 2002, to November, 2011. Descriptive statistics were explored as medians (interquartile range) or frequencies (percentages), as appropriated, and the Kaplan–Meier method was applied for survival estimation. Results: eighty-three patients who underwent surgical treatment with no lymph node dissection (n = 20; 24.1%) or with only a sampling procedure (n=63; 75.98%) were selected for analysis. Among these patients, 27 (32.53%) underwent surgery alone and 56 (67.46%) received some adjuvant treatment. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients (6.02%). Over a median follow-up of 27.4 months (Q25 = 13.7 – Q75 = 46.5), 15 (18.07%) patients suffered from relapses and 11 deaths occurred as result of disease recurrence. Cumulative 1, 2 and 3-year disease- free survivals were 97.32, 91.18 and 78.02%, respectively. Conclusion: on a case-by-case basis, the surgical treatment of clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma without systematic lymphadenectomy did not seem to decrease survival outcomes and presented low rates of surgical morbidity in our experience, but was also related to a high rate use of adjuvant therapy.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000600571
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000600571
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.60.06.017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.60 n.6 2014
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212831465570304