Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: D'Andrea, Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos, Costa, César Vinícius Pereira, Zen, Aurora Carneiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
spa
Título da fonte: Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE
Texto Completo: https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055
Resumo: Objective: Entrepreneurs are responsible for innovation, but they do not act in the vacuum, the greater the support for their action, the improve the chances of success. Startups - technology-based companies with high potential for growth and impact - are associated with the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems that facilitate entrepreneurial action. This paper goal is to provide evidence that help to explain why startups fail in an emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem. Method: We perform exploratory research in which entrepreneurs whose startups failed in the emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem of Porto Alegre, Brazil, were interviewed. We complement the analysis with the collection of secondary data. Results: Building on Isenberg’s (2011) six domains, we generate ideas on how each of them in emergent entrepreneurial ecosystem may influence startup mortality. Our results indicate that emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem could be much better in avoiding the premature failure of startups. Policy and Finance are the most problematic domains, while culture, support, and markets are the three middle-ground dimensions. These last three need improvement, but they are not as critical as the first two. Contributions: This paper contributes to the entrepreneurial ecosystems literature by exploring how emergent ecosystems contribute for discontinuity of promising startups. Originality: Besides entrepreneurial mistakes, problems that are out of the entrepreneur control can also cause a venture's death (Cardon et al., 2011). Building on this, we use Isenberg's (2010; 2011) model for understanding the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on the circumstances that entrepreneurs faced that determined their startup failure (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Social Contributions: by better understanding why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems, we support policymakers in their focus on possible improvements of the features that seem most relevant to entrepreneurs. The public agents can then work to provide a better environment for future entrepreneurial endeavors.
id ANEGEPE_a280dfefec53fd6d052bf0ef2bdc41b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.regepe.org.br:article/2055
network_acronym_str ANEGEPE
network_name_str REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?¿Por qué las startups fracasan en ecosistemas emprendedores emergentes?Por que startups em ecossistemas empreendedores emergentes fracassam?Entrepreneurial EcosystemStartup FailureNew Venture FailureInnovationEmerging Markets.Ecossistemas empreendedoresMortalidade de StartupFalência de novos negóciosInovaçãoMercados emergentesEcosistemas emprendedoresMortalidad de las startupsFracaso de nuevos negociosInnovaciónMercados emergentesObjective: Entrepreneurs are responsible for innovation, but they do not act in the vacuum, the greater the support for their action, the improve the chances of success. Startups - technology-based companies with high potential for growth and impact - are associated with the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems that facilitate entrepreneurial action. This paper goal is to provide evidence that help to explain why startups fail in an emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem. Method: We perform exploratory research in which entrepreneurs whose startups failed in the emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem of Porto Alegre, Brazil, were interviewed. We complement the analysis with the collection of secondary data. Results: Building on Isenberg’s (2011) six domains, we generate ideas on how each of them in emergent entrepreneurial ecosystem may influence startup mortality. Our results indicate that emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem could be much better in avoiding the premature failure of startups. Policy and Finance are the most problematic domains, while culture, support, and markets are the three middle-ground dimensions. These last three need improvement, but they are not as critical as the first two. Contributions: This paper contributes to the entrepreneurial ecosystems literature by exploring how emergent ecosystems contribute for discontinuity of promising startups. Originality: Besides entrepreneurial mistakes, problems that are out of the entrepreneur control can also cause a venture's death (Cardon et al., 2011). Building on this, we use Isenberg's (2010; 2011) model for understanding the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on the circumstances that entrepreneurs faced that determined their startup failure (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Social Contributions: by better understanding why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems, we support policymakers in their focus on possible improvements of the features that seem most relevant to entrepreneurs. The public agents can then work to provide a better environment for future entrepreneurial endeavors.Objetivo: La innovación es clave para el desarrollo económico y social de cualquier área geográfica. Los emprendedores son los actores responsables de la innovación y las startups (empresas de base tecnológica con alto potencial de crecimiento e impacto) suelen estar asociadas a la existencia de ecosistemas emprendedores. Este artículo tiene como objetivo comprender por qué fracasan las startups en un ecosistema empresarial emergente. Método: Realizamos una investigación exploratoria en la que se entrevistó a emprendedores de startups habían fracasado en el ecosistema emprendedor emergente de Porto Alegre, Brasil. También recopilamos datos secundarios sobre el ecosistema de Porto Alegre. Resultados: Basándonos en los seis dominios del ecosistema emprendedor (Isenberg, 2011), generamos ideas sobre cómo los diferentes dominios de un ecosistema emprendedor emergente pueden influir en la mortalidad de las startups y proporcionar posibles vías de mejora. Los resultados muestran que este ecosistema investigado podría ser mucho mejor para evitar el fracaso de las startups. Las políticas y las finanzas son las áreas más problemáticas. Los dominios de cultura, apoyo y mercados son las tres dimensiones intermedias. Necesitan mejoras, pero no son tan críticas como las dos primeras. Contribuciones: Este artículo contribuye a la literatura sobre emprendimiento, explorando los ecosistemas emprendedores emergentes y especialmente el fracaso de las startups en estos entornos. Originalidad: Además de los errores individuales cometidos por el emprendedor, también existen problemas fuera del control del emprendedor que provocan la mortalidad de una empresa (Cardon, Stevens y Potter, 2011). Así, utilizamos el modelo de Isenberg (2010; 2011) para comprender la influencia del ecosistema emprendedor en las circunstancias del fracaso de startups (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Contribuciones sociales: Al comprender mejor por qué fracasan las empresas emergentes en los ecosistemas empresariales emergentes, los responsables políticos pueden centrar su atención en las características que parecen ser más relevantes para los emprendedores. Estos agentes públicos pueden, por lo tanto, trabajar para brindar un mejor entorno a futuros emprendimientos.Objetivo: Empreendedores e suas inovações são chave para o desenvolvimento econômico e social. Startups (empresas baseadas em tecnologia que tem alto potencial de crescimento e impacto) de sucesso são geralmente associadas à existência de ecossistemas empreendedores. Este artigo busca compreender por qual motivo as startups morrem em ecossistemas empreendedores emergentes. Método: usamos pesquisa exploratória, nela entrevistamos empreendedores que passaram pelo processo de morte de suas startups no ecossistema empreendedor emergente da cidade de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Também coletamos dados secundários sobre o mesmo ecossistema. Resultados: baseado nos seis domínios de Isenberg (2011), geramos ideias sobre como cada um destes domínios influencia a mortalidade de startups. Os resultados demonstram que este ecossistema poderia ser muito mais capaz de sustentar as startups, evitando suas mortes precoces. Políticas Públicas e Finanças são os domínios mais problemáticos, enquanto Cultura, Suporte e Mercados são dimensões que precisam de melhorias, mas são menos críticas que as duas primeiras. Contribuições: o artigo contribui com a literatura em empreendedorismo ao explorar os ecossistemas empreendedores emergentes e, em especial, tratar da influência destes ambientes nas mortes das startups. Originalidade: além de erros do próprio empreendedor (ou de seu time), problemas fora do controle deste agente podem causar a morte de startups (Cardon et al., 2011). Assim, usamos o modelo de Isenberg (2010; 2011) para compreender a influência do ecossistema empreendedor nas circunstâncias que levam à morte precoce das startups (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Contribuições Sociais: ao melhor compreender o motivo pelo qual as startups morrem em ecossistemas empreendedores emergentes, formuladores de políticas públicas podem focar sua atenção no que aparece ser mais relevante para o sucesso dos empreendedores. Tais agentes públicos poderão, então, trabalhar para melhorar o ambiente para futuros empreendedores.ANEGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas2023-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/htmltext/htmltext/htmlhttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/205510.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): Sept-Dez. (Continuous Publication); e2055REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2023): sept.-dic. (Publicación Continua); e2055REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; v. 12 n. 3 (2023): set.-dez. (Publicação Contínua); e20552965-1506reponame:Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPEinstname:Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)instacron:ANEGEPEengporspahttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/895https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/896https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/716https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/736https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/737https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/738https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/739Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph D'Andrea, Diego Alex Gazaro dos Santos, César Vinícius Pereira Costa, Aurora Carneiro Zenhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessD'Andrea, Fernando Antonio Monteiro ChristophSantos, Diego Alex Gazaro dosCosta, César Vinícius PereiraZen, Aurora Carneiro2024-01-26T21:48:24Zoai:ojs.regepe.org.br:article/2055Revistahttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/indexPRIhttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/oaieditorialregep@gmail.com2316-20582316-2058opendoar:2024-01-26T21:48:24Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
¿Por qué las startups fracasan en ecosistemas emprendedores emergentes?
Por que startups em ecossistemas empreendedores emergentes fracassam?
title Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
spellingShingle Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
D'Andrea, Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Startup Failure
New Venture Failure
Innovation
Emerging Markets.
Ecossistemas empreendedores
Mortalidade de Startup
Falência de novos negócios
Inovação
Mercados emergentes
Ecosistemas emprendedores
Mortalidad de las startups
Fracaso de nuevos negocios
Innovación
Mercados emergentes
title_short Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
title_full Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
title_fullStr Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
title_full_unstemmed Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
title_sort Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?
author D'Andrea, Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph
author_facet D'Andrea, Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph
Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Costa, César Vinícius Pereira
Zen, Aurora Carneiro
author_role author
author2 Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Costa, César Vinícius Pereira
Zen, Aurora Carneiro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv D'Andrea, Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph
Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro dos
Costa, César Vinícius Pereira
Zen, Aurora Carneiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Startup Failure
New Venture Failure
Innovation
Emerging Markets.
Ecossistemas empreendedores
Mortalidade de Startup
Falência de novos negócios
Inovação
Mercados emergentes
Ecosistemas emprendedores
Mortalidad de las startups
Fracaso de nuevos negocios
Innovación
Mercados emergentes
topic Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Startup Failure
New Venture Failure
Innovation
Emerging Markets.
Ecossistemas empreendedores
Mortalidade de Startup
Falência de novos negócios
Inovação
Mercados emergentes
Ecosistemas emprendedores
Mortalidad de las startups
Fracaso de nuevos negocios
Innovación
Mercados emergentes
description Objective: Entrepreneurs are responsible for innovation, but they do not act in the vacuum, the greater the support for their action, the improve the chances of success. Startups - technology-based companies with high potential for growth and impact - are associated with the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems that facilitate entrepreneurial action. This paper goal is to provide evidence that help to explain why startups fail in an emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem. Method: We perform exploratory research in which entrepreneurs whose startups failed in the emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem of Porto Alegre, Brazil, were interviewed. We complement the analysis with the collection of secondary data. Results: Building on Isenberg’s (2011) six domains, we generate ideas on how each of them in emergent entrepreneurial ecosystem may influence startup mortality. Our results indicate that emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem could be much better in avoiding the premature failure of startups. Policy and Finance are the most problematic domains, while culture, support, and markets are the three middle-ground dimensions. These last three need improvement, but they are not as critical as the first two. Contributions: This paper contributes to the entrepreneurial ecosystems literature by exploring how emergent ecosystems contribute for discontinuity of promising startups. Originality: Besides entrepreneurial mistakes, problems that are out of the entrepreneur control can also cause a venture's death (Cardon et al., 2011). Building on this, we use Isenberg's (2010; 2011) model for understanding the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on the circumstances that entrepreneurs faced that determined their startup failure (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Social Contributions: by better understanding why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems, we support policymakers in their focus on possible improvements of the features that seem most relevant to entrepreneurs. The public agents can then work to provide a better environment for future entrepreneurial endeavors.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055
10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055
url https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055
identifier_str_mv 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
spa
language eng
por
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/895
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/896
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/716
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/736
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/737
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/738
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2055/739
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/html
text/html
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANEGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANEGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): Sept-Dez. (Continuous Publication); e2055
REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2023): sept.-dic. (Publicación Continua); e2055
REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; v. 12 n. 3 (2023): set.-dez. (Publicação Contínua); e2055
2965-1506
reponame:Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE
instname:Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)
instacron:ANEGEPE
instname_str Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)
instacron_str ANEGEPE
institution ANEGEPE
reponame_str Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE
collection Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editorialregep@gmail.com
_version_ 1803580218649083904