Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loviscek,Vittoria
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552021000300701
Resumo: ABSTRACT Context: 25 years after it was coined, the triple bottom line (TBL) is now considered a failure by its own author. The concept can be considered the foundational base for the development of a necessary new business model for sustainable operations management. Objective: this paper aims to present systematic literature updates, controversies, limitations, and future framework developments of the TBL concept presented by Elkington in 1998. Methodology: through a systematic literature review spanning from 1998 to 2019, considering two main bibliographical databases, it was possible to evaluate the use of the concept in the sustainability literature. Results: the main results present that the concept has not lost its credibility; on the contrary, it reached its peak in the past five years, due to environmental and societal pressures. Also, it has been used inadequately considering only two of its three spheres (either financial and social, or financial and environmental). Conclusion: the study also exposes capabilities that if included to the TBL concepts can result into success of the business model. Therefore, our aim is to scrutinize how the concept has been used along these years, reflect on its impact in the academia and the business segment, and draw some conclusions on future research agenda and the transition toward a holistic framework for sustainable operations.
id ANPPGA-1_3ce9d0b26e5009d12782b3785fe3f8db
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-65552021000300701
network_acronym_str ANPPGA-1
network_name_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Reviewsystematic reviewholistic frameworktriple bottom linesustainabilitysustainable operations managementABSTRACT Context: 25 years after it was coined, the triple bottom line (TBL) is now considered a failure by its own author. The concept can be considered the foundational base for the development of a necessary new business model for sustainable operations management. Objective: this paper aims to present systematic literature updates, controversies, limitations, and future framework developments of the TBL concept presented by Elkington in 1998. Methodology: through a systematic literature review spanning from 1998 to 2019, considering two main bibliographical databases, it was possible to evaluate the use of the concept in the sustainability literature. Results: the main results present that the concept has not lost its credibility; on the contrary, it reached its peak in the past five years, due to environmental and societal pressures. Also, it has been used inadequately considering only two of its three spheres (either financial and social, or financial and environmental). Conclusion: the study also exposes capabilities that if included to the TBL concepts can result into success of the business model. Therefore, our aim is to scrutinize how the concept has been used along these years, reflect on its impact in the academia and the business segment, and draw some conclusions on future research agenda and the transition toward a holistic framework for sustainable operations.Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552021000300701Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.25 n.3 2021reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200017.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoviscek,Vittoriaeng2020-11-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-65552021000300701Revistahttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/racONGhttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/oairac@anpad.org.br1982-78491415-6555opendoar:2020-11-10T00:00RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
title Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
spellingShingle Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
Loviscek,Vittoria
systematic review
holistic framework
triple bottom line
sustainability
sustainable operations management
title_short Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
title_full Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
title_sort Triple Bottom Line toward a Holistic Framework for Sustainability: A Systematic Review
author Loviscek,Vittoria
author_facet Loviscek,Vittoria
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loviscek,Vittoria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv systematic review
holistic framework
triple bottom line
sustainability
sustainable operations management
topic systematic review
holistic framework
triple bottom line
sustainability
sustainable operations management
description ABSTRACT Context: 25 years after it was coined, the triple bottom line (TBL) is now considered a failure by its own author. The concept can be considered the foundational base for the development of a necessary new business model for sustainable operations management. Objective: this paper aims to present systematic literature updates, controversies, limitations, and future framework developments of the TBL concept presented by Elkington in 1998. Methodology: through a systematic literature review spanning from 1998 to 2019, considering two main bibliographical databases, it was possible to evaluate the use of the concept in the sustainability literature. Results: the main results present that the concept has not lost its credibility; on the contrary, it reached its peak in the past five years, due to environmental and societal pressures. Also, it has been used inadequately considering only two of its three spheres (either financial and social, or financial and environmental). Conclusion: the study also exposes capabilities that if included to the TBL concepts can result into success of the business model. Therefore, our aim is to scrutinize how the concept has been used along these years, reflect on its impact in the academia and the business segment, and draw some conclusions on future research agenda and the transition toward a holistic framework for sustainable operations.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552021000300701
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552021000300701
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200017.en
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.25 n.3 2021
reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
collection RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rac@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209054025056256