What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mateussi,Mariana Vendramin
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, Daou,Júlia Pozetti, Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera, Riera,Rachel, Pacheco,Rafael Leite, Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000500497
Resumo: ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite the high prevalence of vitamin D supplementation, its use remains controversial. The objective of this review was to identify and summarize the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews regarding vitamin D supplementation for preventing ortreating any clinical condition. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A search was conducted to identify all Cochrane systematic reviews that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were screened by two authors. RESULTS: We included 27 Cochrane systematic reviews: 10 assessing use of vitamin D for prevention and 17 for treatment. The reviews found moderate to high quality of evidence regarding the benefit of vitamin D for pregnant women (prevention of adverse events: preterm birth risk [rate ratio, RR 0.36; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.14 to 0.93] and low birthweight risk [RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67]) and for asthma patients (reduction of severe exacerbations [RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88]). No benefit was found regarding vitamin D supplementation alone (without calcium) for preventing hip or any new fracture. For all other outcomes assessed under various conditions, the current quality of evidence is low or unknown, and therefore insufficient for any recommendation. CONCLUSION: Based on moderate to high quality of evidence, the Cochrane systematic reviews included here showed that there were some benefits from vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women and asthma patients and no benefits for preventing fractures.
id APM-1_3009017fdf1b9bb93cb03e0ba3781d58
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802017000500497
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?ReviewVitamin DEvidence-based medicineEvaluation of results of therapeuticinterventionsEvidence-based practiceABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite the high prevalence of vitamin D supplementation, its use remains controversial. The objective of this review was to identify and summarize the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews regarding vitamin D supplementation for preventing ortreating any clinical condition. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A search was conducted to identify all Cochrane systematic reviews that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were screened by two authors. RESULTS: We included 27 Cochrane systematic reviews: 10 assessing use of vitamin D for prevention and 17 for treatment. The reviews found moderate to high quality of evidence regarding the benefit of vitamin D for pregnant women (prevention of adverse events: preterm birth risk [rate ratio, RR 0.36; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.14 to 0.93] and low birthweight risk [RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67]) and for asthma patients (reduction of severe exacerbations [RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88]). No benefit was found regarding vitamin D supplementation alone (without calcium) for preventing hip or any new fracture. For all other outcomes assessed under various conditions, the current quality of evidence is low or unknown, and therefore insufficient for any recommendation. CONCLUSION: Based on moderate to high quality of evidence, the Cochrane systematic reviews included here showed that there were some benefits from vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women and asthma patients and no benefits for preventing fractures.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000500497Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.135 n.5 2017reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0230150817info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMateussi,Mariana VendraminLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzDaou,Júlia PozettiMartimbianco,Ana Luiza CabreraRiera,RachelPacheco,Rafael LeitePachito,Daniela Viannaeng2017-11-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802017000500497Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2017-11-30T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
Mateussi,Mariana Vendramin
Review
Vitamin D
Evidence-based medicine
Evaluation of results of therapeutic
interventions
Evidence-based practice
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
author Mateussi,Mariana Vendramin
author_facet Mateussi,Mariana Vendramin
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Daou,Júlia Pozetti
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Riera,Rachel
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
author_role author
author2 Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Daou,Júlia Pozetti
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Riera,Rachel
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mateussi,Mariana Vendramin
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Daou,Júlia Pozetti
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Riera,Rachel
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review
Vitamin D
Evidence-based medicine
Evaluation of results of therapeutic
interventions
Evidence-based practice
topic Review
Vitamin D
Evidence-based medicine
Evaluation of results of therapeutic
interventions
Evidence-based practice
description ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite the high prevalence of vitamin D supplementation, its use remains controversial. The objective of this review was to identify and summarize the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews regarding vitamin D supplementation for preventing ortreating any clinical condition. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A search was conducted to identify all Cochrane systematic reviews that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were screened by two authors. RESULTS: We included 27 Cochrane systematic reviews: 10 assessing use of vitamin D for prevention and 17 for treatment. The reviews found moderate to high quality of evidence regarding the benefit of vitamin D for pregnant women (prevention of adverse events: preterm birth risk [rate ratio, RR 0.36; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.14 to 0.93] and low birthweight risk [RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67]) and for asthma patients (reduction of severe exacerbations [RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88]). No benefit was found regarding vitamin D supplementation alone (without calcium) for preventing hip or any new fracture. For all other outcomes assessed under various conditions, the current quality of evidence is low or unknown, and therefore insufficient for any recommendation. CONCLUSION: Based on moderate to high quality of evidence, the Cochrane systematic reviews included here showed that there were some benefits from vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women and asthma patients and no benefits for preventing fractures.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000500497
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000500497
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0230150817
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.135 n.5 2017
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209265809096704