What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braga,Vinícius Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rocha,Luana Pompeu dos Santos, Bernardo,Daniel Damasceno, Cruz,Carolina de Oliveira, Riera,Rachel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000600578
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
id APM-1_407604eb7846eec61aacfcf281c8da66
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802017000600578
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?Review [publication type]ProbioticsPreventive medicineEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000600578Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.135 n.6 2017reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga,Vinícius LopesRocha,Luana Pompeu dos SantosBernardo,Daniel DamascenoCruz,Carolina de OliveiraRiera,Racheleng2017-12-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802017000600578Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2017-12-14T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
Braga,Vinícius Lopes
Review [publication type]
Probiotics
Preventive medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
author Braga,Vinícius Lopes
author_facet Braga,Vinícius Lopes
Rocha,Luana Pompeu dos Santos
Bernardo,Daniel Damasceno
Cruz,Carolina de Oliveira
Riera,Rachel
author_role author
author2 Rocha,Luana Pompeu dos Santos
Bernardo,Daniel Damasceno
Cruz,Carolina de Oliveira
Riera,Rachel
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga,Vinícius Lopes
Rocha,Luana Pompeu dos Santos
Bernardo,Daniel Damasceno
Cruz,Carolina de Oliveira
Riera,Rachel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review [publication type]
Probiotics
Preventive medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
topic Review [publication type]
Probiotics
Preventive medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000600578
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802017000600578
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.135 n.6 2017
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209265426366464