What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective. |
id |
UFSP_3392531cdf6e82edf2d98ebaa8b07cdf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/58214 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?Review [publication type]ProbioticsPreventive medicineEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceBACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, BrazilCochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceAssociacao Paulista Medicina2020-09-01T13:21:20Z2020-09-01T13:21:20Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion578-586application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 6, p. 578-586, 2017.10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017S1516-31802017000600578.pdf1516-3180S1516-31802017000600578https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214WOS:000418637300012engSao Paulo Medical JournalSao Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP]Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP]Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-01T23:05:14Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/58214Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-01T23:05:14Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
title |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
spellingShingle |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP] Review [publication type] Probiotics Preventive medicine Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based practice |
title_short |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
title_full |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
title_fullStr |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
title_sort |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions? |
author |
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP] dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP] Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP] Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP] Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP] Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP] Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP] Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP] dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP] Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP] Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP] Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Review [publication type] Probiotics Preventive medicine Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based practice |
topic |
Review [publication type] Probiotics Preventive medicine Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based practice |
description |
BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2020-09-01T13:21:20Z 2020-09-01T13:21:20Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017 Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 6, p. 578-586, 2017. 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017 S1516-31802017000600578.pdf 1516-3180 S1516-31802017000600578 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214 WOS:000418637300012 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214 |
identifier_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 6, p. 578-586, 2017. 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017 S1516-31802017000600578.pdf 1516-3180 S1516-31802017000600578 WOS:000418637300012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
578-586 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associacao Paulista Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associacao Paulista Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268434234474496 |