What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP], Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP], Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP], Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
id UFSP_3392531cdf6e82edf2d98ebaa8b07cdf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/58214
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?Review [publication type]ProbioticsPreventive medicineEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceBACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, BrazilCochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceAssociacao Paulista Medicina2020-09-01T13:21:20Z2020-09-01T13:21:20Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion578-586application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 6, p. 578-586, 2017.10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017S1516-31802017000600578.pdf1516-3180S1516-31802017000600578https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214WOS:000418637300012engSao Paulo Medical JournalSao Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP]Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP]Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-01T23:05:14Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/58214Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-01T23:05:14Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]
Review [publication type]
Probiotics
Preventive medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?
author Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]
author_facet Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]
dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP]
Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP]
Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP]
Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP]
Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga, Vinicius Lopes [UNIFESP]
dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [UNIFESP]
Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [UNIFESP]
Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review [publication type]
Probiotics
Preventive medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
topic Review [publication type]
Probiotics
Preventive medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
description BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2020-09-01T13:21:20Z
2020-09-01T13:21:20Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 6, p. 578-586, 2017.
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
S1516-31802017000600578.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31802017000600578
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214
WOS:000418637300012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58214
identifier_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 6, p. 578-586, 2017.
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
S1516-31802017000600578.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31802017000600578
WOS:000418637300012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 578-586
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associacao Paulista Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associacao Paulista Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268434234474496