Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pekcan,Meryem Kuru
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sarıkaya,Esma, Tokmak,Aytekin, İnal,Hasan Ali, Yılmaz,Nafiye
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000400379
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The underlying cause of seasonal infertility in humans is unclear, but is likely to be ­multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the pregnancy rates among infertile women who underwent induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) with the season in which the fertility treatment was performed. DESIGN AND SETTING: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 466 patients who were treated in the reproductive endocrinology and infertility outpatient clinic of a tertiary-level women’s healthcare and maternity hospital. METHODS: Retrospective demographic, hormonal and ultrasonographic data were obtained from the patients’ medical records. Clomiphene citrate or gonadotropin medications were used for induced ovulation. The patients were divided into four groups according to the season (spring, winter, autumn and summer) in which fertility treatment was received. Clinical pregnancy rates were calculated and compared between these four groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the seasonal groups in terms of age, infertility type, ovarian reserve tests, duration of infertility, medications used or length of stimulation. A total of 337 patients (72.3%) were treated with clomiphene citrate and 129 (27.7%) with gonadotropin; no significant difference between these two groups was observed. The clinical pregnancy rates for the spring, winter, autumn and summer groups were 15.6% (n = 24), 8.6% (n = 9), 11.5% (n = 13) and 7.4% (n = 7), respectively (P = 0.174). CONCLUSIONS: Although the spring group had the highest pregnancy rate, the rates of successful IUI did not differ significantly between the seasonal groups.
id APM-1_5445081b7f2eb197190532872b6deb04
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802019000400379
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohortSeasonsCircadian rhythmOvulation inductionPregnancyMelatoninABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The underlying cause of seasonal infertility in humans is unclear, but is likely to be ­multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the pregnancy rates among infertile women who underwent induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) with the season in which the fertility treatment was performed. DESIGN AND SETTING: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 466 patients who were treated in the reproductive endocrinology and infertility outpatient clinic of a tertiary-level women’s healthcare and maternity hospital. METHODS: Retrospective demographic, hormonal and ultrasonographic data were obtained from the patients’ medical records. Clomiphene citrate or gonadotropin medications were used for induced ovulation. The patients were divided into four groups according to the season (spring, winter, autumn and summer) in which fertility treatment was received. Clinical pregnancy rates were calculated and compared between these four groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the seasonal groups in terms of age, infertility type, ovarian reserve tests, duration of infertility, medications used or length of stimulation. A total of 337 patients (72.3%) were treated with clomiphene citrate and 129 (27.7%) with gonadotropin; no significant difference between these two groups was observed. The clinical pregnancy rates for the spring, winter, autumn and summer groups were 15.6% (n = 24), 8.6% (n = 9), 11.5% (n = 13) and 7.4% (n = 7), respectively (P = 0.174). CONCLUSIONS: Although the spring group had the highest pregnancy rate, the rates of successful IUI did not differ significantly between the seasonal groups.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000400379Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.4 2019reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2018.05111220719info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPekcan,Meryem KuruSarıkaya,EsmaTokmak,Aytekinİnal,Hasan AliYılmaz,Nafiyeeng2020-01-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802019000400379Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2020-01-06T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
title Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
spellingShingle Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
Pekcan,Meryem Kuru
Seasons
Circadian rhythm
Ovulation induction
Pregnancy
Melatonin
title_short Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
title_full Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
title_fullStr Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
title_sort Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort
author Pekcan,Meryem Kuru
author_facet Pekcan,Meryem Kuru
Sarıkaya,Esma
Tokmak,Aytekin
İnal,Hasan Ali
Yılmaz,Nafiye
author_role author
author2 Sarıkaya,Esma
Tokmak,Aytekin
İnal,Hasan Ali
Yılmaz,Nafiye
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pekcan,Meryem Kuru
Sarıkaya,Esma
Tokmak,Aytekin
İnal,Hasan Ali
Yılmaz,Nafiye
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Seasons
Circadian rhythm
Ovulation induction
Pregnancy
Melatonin
topic Seasons
Circadian rhythm
Ovulation induction
Pregnancy
Melatonin
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The underlying cause of seasonal infertility in humans is unclear, but is likely to be ­multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the pregnancy rates among infertile women who underwent induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) with the season in which the fertility treatment was performed. DESIGN AND SETTING: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 466 patients who were treated in the reproductive endocrinology and infertility outpatient clinic of a tertiary-level women’s healthcare and maternity hospital. METHODS: Retrospective demographic, hormonal and ultrasonographic data were obtained from the patients’ medical records. Clomiphene citrate or gonadotropin medications were used for induced ovulation. The patients were divided into four groups according to the season (spring, winter, autumn and summer) in which fertility treatment was received. Clinical pregnancy rates were calculated and compared between these four groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the seasonal groups in terms of age, infertility type, ovarian reserve tests, duration of infertility, medications used or length of stimulation. A total of 337 patients (72.3%) were treated with clomiphene citrate and 129 (27.7%) with gonadotropin; no significant difference between these two groups was observed. The clinical pregnancy rates for the spring, winter, autumn and summer groups were 15.6% (n = 24), 8.6% (n = 9), 11.5% (n = 13) and 7.4% (n = 7), respectively (P = 0.174). CONCLUSIONS: Although the spring group had the highest pregnancy rate, the rates of successful IUI did not differ significantly between the seasonal groups.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000400379
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000400379
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.05111220719
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.4 2019
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266699337728