Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hassan,Afreenish
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Usman,Javaid, Kaleem,Fatima, Omair,Maria, Khalid,Ali, Iqbal,Muhammad
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories.
id BSID-1_eba24917320d0f8c1dd9bd7166e321fe
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-86702011000400002
network_acronym_str BSID-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolatesbiofilmsbacteriaanti-bacterial agentsBACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.15 n.4 2011reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1590/S1413-86702011000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHassan,AfreenishUsman,JavaidKaleem,FatimaOmair,MariaKhalid,AliIqbal,Muhammadeng2011-08-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702011000400002Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2011-08-15T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
title Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
spellingShingle Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
Hassan,Afreenish
biofilms
bacteria
anti-bacterial agents
title_short Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
title_full Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
title_fullStr Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
title_sort Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
author Hassan,Afreenish
author_facet Hassan,Afreenish
Usman,Javaid
Kaleem,Fatima
Omair,Maria
Khalid,Ali
Iqbal,Muhammad
author_role author
author2 Usman,Javaid
Kaleem,Fatima
Omair,Maria
Khalid,Ali
Iqbal,Muhammad
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hassan,Afreenish
Usman,Javaid
Kaleem,Fatima
Omair,Maria
Khalid,Ali
Iqbal,Muhammad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biofilms
bacteria
anti-bacterial agents
topic biofilms
bacteria
anti-bacterial agents
description BACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-86702011000400002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.15 n.4 2011
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron:BSID
instname_str Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron_str BSID
institution BSID
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
collection Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1754209241909952512