Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories. |
id |
BSID-1_eba24917320d0f8c1dd9bd7166e321fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-86702011000400002 |
network_acronym_str |
BSID-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolatesbiofilmsbacteriaanti-bacterial agentsBACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.15 n.4 2011reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1590/S1413-86702011000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHassan,AfreenishUsman,JavaidKaleem,FatimaOmair,MariaKhalid,AliIqbal,Muhammadeng2011-08-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702011000400002Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2011-08-15T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
title |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates Hassan,Afreenish biofilms bacteria anti-bacterial agents |
title_short |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
title_full |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
title_sort |
Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates |
author |
Hassan,Afreenish |
author_facet |
Hassan,Afreenish Usman,Javaid Kaleem,Fatima Omair,Maria Khalid,Ali Iqbal,Muhammad |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Usman,Javaid Kaleem,Fatima Omair,Maria Khalid,Ali Iqbal,Muhammad |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hassan,Afreenish Usman,Javaid Kaleem,Fatima Omair,Maria Khalid,Ali Iqbal,Muhammad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biofilms bacteria anti-bacterial agents |
topic |
biofilms bacteria anti-bacterial agents |
description |
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702011000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1413-86702011000400002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.15 n.4 2011 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) instacron:BSID |
instname_str |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) |
instacron_str |
BSID |
institution |
BSID |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1754209241909952512 |