Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação |
Texto Completo: | http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210 |
Resumo: | This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas. |
id |
CAPES-1_26b3f41990630e5b9fa1c5307eb63dd1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.192.168.0.141:article/210 |
network_acronym_str |
CAPES-1 |
network_name_str |
RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação |
spelling |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation processProgramas de posgrado interdisciplinarios: contexto, contradicciones y límites del proceso de evaluación CapesProgramas de pós-graduação interdisciplinares: contexto, contradições e limites do processo de avaliação CapesAvaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade.Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity.Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad.This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas.Este texto se propõe a refletir sobre as principais contradições e os limites da avaliação realizada nos programas de pós-graduação submetidos à Comissão de Avaliação Interdisciplinar (CAInter/Capes). Algumas das inquietações se relacionam à busca pela qualidade na produção de conhecimento nesses programas; por um lado, vinculandose à organização dos currículos, à composição do corpo docente e discente, à dinâmica dos grupos de pesquisa, às condições de elaboração de dissertações, teses e pesquisa em que a multi e a interdisciplinaridade se colocam como meta; pelo outro, ao Sistema de Avaliação a que os programas estão submetidos e têm na disciplinaridade sua gênese. As conclusões apontam principalmente para a necessidade de discutir alternativas à forma de avaliação disciplinar, sob pena de inviabilizar aspossibilidades de construção de conhecimentos que visam estabelecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas.Este texto se propone reflexionar sobre las principales contradicciones y límites de la evaluación realizada en los programas de posgrado sometidos a la Comisión de Evaluación Interdisciplinaria (CAInter/Capes). Algunas de las inquietudes se relacionan a la búsqueda por calidad en la producción de conocimiento en esos programas; por un lado, vinculándose a la organización de los currículos, a la composición del cuerpo docente y discente, a la dinámica de los grupos de investigación, a las condiciones de elaboración de disertaciones, tesis e investigación en que la multi y la interdisciplinariedad se colocan como meta; por el otro, al Sistema de Evaluación a que los programas están sometidos y tienen en la disciplinariedad su génesis. Las conclusiones apuntan principalmente a la necesidad de discutir alternativas a la forma de evaluación disciplinaria, bajo pena de hacer inviables las posibilidades de construcción de conocimientos que buscan establecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas.Revista Brasileira de Pós-GraduaçãoOliveira, Marlize RubinAlmeida, Jalcione2011-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/21010.21713/2358-2332.2011.v8.210RBPG; v. 8, n. 15 (2011)Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação; v. 8, n. 15 (2011)2358-23321806-8405reponame:RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduaçãoinstname:CAPESinstacron:CAPESporhttp://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210/pdf##submission.copyrightStatement##info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-07-20T15:50:36Zmail@mail.com - |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process Programas de posgrado interdisciplinarios: contexto, contradicciones y límites del proceso de evaluación Capes Programas de pós-graduação interdisciplinares: contexto, contradições e limites do processo de avaliação Capes |
title |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process |
spellingShingle |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process Oliveira, Marlize Rubin Avaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade. Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity. Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad. |
title_short |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process |
title_full |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process |
title_fullStr |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process |
title_sort |
Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process |
author |
Oliveira, Marlize Rubin |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Marlize Rubin Almeida, Jalcione |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Jalcione |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Marlize Rubin Almeida, Jalcione |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade. Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity. Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad. |
topic |
Avaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade. Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity. Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad. |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas. Este texto se propõe a refletir sobre as principais contradições e os limites da avaliação realizada nos programas de pós-graduação submetidos à Comissão de Avaliação Interdisciplinar (CAInter/Capes). Algumas das inquietações se relacionam à busca pela qualidade na produção de conhecimento nesses programas; por um lado, vinculandose à organização dos currículos, à composição do corpo docente e discente, à dinâmica dos grupos de pesquisa, às condições de elaboração de dissertações, teses e pesquisa em que a multi e a interdisciplinaridade se colocam como meta; pelo outro, ao Sistema de Avaliação a que os programas estão submetidos e têm na disciplinaridade sua gênese. As conclusões apontam principalmente para a necessidade de discutir alternativas à forma de avaliação disciplinar, sob pena de inviabilizar aspossibilidades de construção de conhecimentos que visam estabelecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas. Este texto se propone reflexionar sobre las principales contradicciones y límites de la evaluación realizada en los programas de posgrado sometidos a la Comisión de Evaluación Interdisciplinaria (CAInter/Capes). Algunas de las inquietudes se relacionan a la búsqueda por calidad en la producción de conocimiento en esos programas; por un lado, vinculándose a la organización de los currículos, a la composición del cuerpo docente y discente, a la dinámica de los grupos de investigación, a las condiciones de elaboración de disertaciones, tesis e investigación en que la multi y la interdisciplinariedad se colocan como meta; por el otro, al Sistema de Evaluación a que los programas están sometidos y tienen en la disciplinariedad su génesis. Las conclusiones apuntan principalmente a la necesidad de discutir alternativas a la forma de evaluación disciplinaria, bajo pena de hacer inviables las posibilidades de construcción de conocimientos que buscan establecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas. |
description |
This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-03-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210 10.21713/2358-2332.2011.v8.210 |
url |
http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21713/2358-2332.2011.v8.210 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
##submission.copyrightStatement## info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
##submission.copyrightStatement## |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RBPG; v. 8, n. 15 (2011) Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação; v. 8, n. 15 (2011) 2358-2332 1806-8405 reponame:RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação instname:CAPES instacron:CAPES |
reponame_str |
RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação |
collection |
RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação |
instname_str |
CAPES |
instacron_str |
CAPES |
institution |
CAPES |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
_version_ |
1639987074263154688 |