Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maccari, Emerson Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Martins, Cibele Barsalini, Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
Texto Completo: http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/564
Resumo: The Brazilian evaluation system of graduate programs has been developing over time and it is premised on forming human resources and generating knowledge for the development of the country. This paper aims to analyze the evaluation system of the Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) and the evaluation system of the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Capes) and its use by program coordinators. The research method was the study of multiple cases, considering eight programs: four in the United States and four in Brazil. The main results indicate differences in the design and use of the systems for the evaluation of programs in both countries. In the United States, the evaluation system is similar to the purpose of ISO systems, and it is focused on the process of evaluation. In Brazil, the programs must be recomemended by CAPES. It is a legal requirement that ensures the validity of the master’s and doctorate at the national level. The evaluation system of CAPES is a ranking system, which is focused on product and not on the process.
id CAPES-1_3904589e975ef9e469abac00b71cc04d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.192.168.0.141:article/564
network_acronym_str CAPES-1
network_name_str RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
spelling Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinatorsComparativo entre os sistema de avaliação da AACSB (Estados Unidos) e da Capes (Brasil) e seu uso pelos coordenadores de programasComparación entre los sistemas de evaluación de la Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (Estados Unidos) y la Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brasil) y su utilización por los coordinadores de programasEvaluation System. Evaluation System of CAPES. Evaluation System of AACSB. Evaluation of Graduate Study.AdministraçãoSistema de avaliação; Sistema de avaliação da CAPES; Sistema de Avaliação da AACSB; Avaliação da Pós-GraduaçãoThe Brazilian evaluation system of graduate programs has been developing over time and it is premised on forming human resources and generating knowledge for the development of the country. This paper aims to analyze the evaluation system of the Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) and the evaluation system of the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Capes) and its use by program coordinators. The research method was the study of multiple cases, considering eight programs: four in the United States and four in Brazil. The main results indicate differences in the design and use of the systems for the evaluation of programs in both countries. In the United States, the evaluation system is similar to the purpose of ISO systems, and it is focused on the process of evaluation. In Brazil, the programs must be recomemended by CAPES. It is a legal requirement that ensures the validity of the master’s and doctorate at the national level. The evaluation system of CAPES is a ranking system, which is focused on product and not on the process.O sistema brasileiro de avaliação de programas de pós-graduação vem evoluindo ao longo do tempo e tem como premissa a formação de recursos humanos e a geração de conhecimento para o desenvolvimento do país. Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar de forma comparada o sistema de avaliação da Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) e o sistema de avaliação da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) e seu uso pelos coordenadores de programa. O método de pesquisa foi o estudo de casos múltiplos, englobando oito programas: quatro nos Estados Unidos e quatro no Brasil. Os principais resultados indicam diferenças na concepção e no uso dos sistemas pelos programas nos dois países. Nos Estados Unidos, o sistema de avaliação é similar ao propósito dos sistemas ISO e está focado no processo. No Brasil, ter o programa recomendado pela Capes é um requisito legal que assegura a validade dos diplomas de mestrado e doutorado em âmbito nacional. O sistema de avaliação da Capes é de ranking e está focado no produto. El sistema brasileño de evaluación de los programas de posgrado ha evolucionado con el tiempo y se basa en la formación de recursos humanos y la generación de conocimiento para el desarrollo del país. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el sistema de evaluación de la Asociación de Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) y el sistema de evaluación de la Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) y su utilización por los coordinadores del programa. El método de investigación fue el estudio de casos múltiples, con ocho programas: cuatro en Estados Unidos y cuatro en Brasil. Los principales resultados indican diferencias en el diseño y uso de sistemas de programas en ambos los países. En Estados Unidos, el sistema de evaluación es similar a la finalidad de sistemas ISO y está enfocado en proceso. En Brasil, tener el programa acreditado por la CAPES es un requisito legal que asegura la validez de la maestría y doctorado en el ámbito nacional. El sistema de evaluación de CAPES es de clasificación y se centra en el producto.Revista Brasileira de Pós-GraduaçãoCAPESMaccari, Emerson AntonioMartins, Cibele BarsaliniAlmeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de2015-03-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/56410.21713/2358-2332.2015.v12.564RBPG; v. 12, n. 27 (2015)Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação; v. 12, n. 27 (2015)2358-23321806-8405reponame:RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduaçãoinstname:CAPESinstacron:CAPESporhttp://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/564/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-07-20T15:50:56Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
Comparativo entre os sistema de avaliação da AACSB (Estados Unidos) e da Capes (Brasil) e seu uso pelos coordenadores de programas
Comparación entre los sistemas de evaluación de la Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (Estados Unidos) y la Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brasil) y su utilización por los coordinadores de programas
title Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
spellingShingle Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
Maccari, Emerson Antonio
Evaluation System. Evaluation System of CAPES. Evaluation System of AACSB. Evaluation of Graduate Study.
Administração
Sistema de avaliação; Sistema de avaliação da CAPES; Sistema de Avaliação da AACSB; Avaliação da Pós-Graduação
title_short Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
title_full Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
title_fullStr Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
title_sort Comparison between the assessment systems of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (United States) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Brazil) and its use by programs coordinators
author Maccari, Emerson Antonio
author_facet Maccari, Emerson Antonio
Martins, Cibele Barsalini
Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de
author_role author
author2 Martins, Cibele Barsalini
Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv CAPES
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maccari, Emerson Antonio
Martins, Cibele Barsalini
Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evaluation System. Evaluation System of CAPES. Evaluation System of AACSB. Evaluation of Graduate Study.
Administração
Sistema de avaliação; Sistema de avaliação da CAPES; Sistema de Avaliação da AACSB; Avaliação da Pós-Graduação
topic Evaluation System. Evaluation System of CAPES. Evaluation System of AACSB. Evaluation of Graduate Study.
Administração
Sistema de avaliação; Sistema de avaliação da CAPES; Sistema de Avaliação da AACSB; Avaliação da Pós-Graduação
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Brazilian evaluation system of graduate programs has been developing over time and it is premised on forming human resources and generating knowledge for the development of the country. This paper aims to analyze the evaluation system of the Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) and the evaluation system of the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Capes) and its use by program coordinators. The research method was the study of multiple cases, considering eight programs: four in the United States and four in Brazil. The main results indicate differences in the design and use of the systems for the evaluation of programs in both countries. In the United States, the evaluation system is similar to the purpose of ISO systems, and it is focused on the process of evaluation. In Brazil, the programs must be recomemended by CAPES. It is a legal requirement that ensures the validity of the master’s and doctorate at the national level. The evaluation system of CAPES is a ranking system, which is focused on product and not on the process.
O sistema brasileiro de avaliação de programas de pós-graduação vem evoluindo ao longo do tempo e tem como premissa a formação de recursos humanos e a geração de conhecimento para o desenvolvimento do país. Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar de forma comparada o sistema de avaliação da Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) e o sistema de avaliação da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) e seu uso pelos coordenadores de programa. O método de pesquisa foi o estudo de casos múltiplos, englobando oito programas: quatro nos Estados Unidos e quatro no Brasil. Os principais resultados indicam diferenças na concepção e no uso dos sistemas pelos programas nos dois países. Nos Estados Unidos, o sistema de avaliação é similar ao propósito dos sistemas ISO e está focado no processo. No Brasil, ter o programa recomendado pela Capes é um requisito legal que assegura a validade dos diplomas de mestrado e doutorado em âmbito nacional. O sistema de avaliação da Capes é de ranking e está focado no produto.
El sistema brasileño de evaluación de los programas de posgrado ha evolucionado con el tiempo y se basa en la formación de recursos humanos y la generación de conocimiento para el desarrollo del país. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el sistema de evaluación de la Asociación de Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) y el sistema de evaluación de la Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) y su utilización por los coordinadores del programa. El método de investigación fue el estudio de casos múltiples, con ocho programas: cuatro en Estados Unidos y cuatro en Brasil. Los principales resultados indican diferencias en el diseño y uso de sistemas de programas en ambos los países. En Estados Unidos, el sistema de evaluación es similar a la finalidad de sistemas ISO y está enfocado en proceso. En Brasil, tener el programa acreditado por la CAPES es un requisito legal que asegura la validez de la maestría y doctorado en el ámbito nacional. El sistema de evaluación de CAPES es de clasificación y se centra en el producto.
description The Brazilian evaluation system of graduate programs has been developing over time and it is premised on forming human resources and generating knowledge for the development of the country. This paper aims to analyze the evaluation system of the Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB) and the evaluation system of the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Capes) and its use by program coordinators. The research method was the study of multiple cases, considering eight programs: four in the United States and four in Brazil. The main results indicate differences in the design and use of the systems for the evaluation of programs in both countries. In the United States, the evaluation system is similar to the purpose of ISO systems, and it is focused on the process of evaluation. In Brazil, the programs must be recomemended by CAPES. It is a legal requirement that ensures the validity of the master’s and doctorate at the national level. The evaluation system of CAPES is a ranking system, which is focused on product and not on the process.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/564
10.21713/2358-2332.2015.v12.564
url http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/564
identifier_str_mv 10.21713/2358-2332.2015.v12.564
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/564/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBPG; v. 12, n. 27 (2015)
Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação; v. 12, n. 27 (2015)
2358-2332
1806-8405
reponame:RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
instname:CAPES
instacron:CAPES
reponame_str RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
collection RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
instname_str CAPES
instacron_str CAPES
institution CAPES
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1639987074693070848

Registros relacionados