METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Veiga,Daniela Francescato
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Lydia Masako
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034
Resumo: Objective: To develop a proposal for metrics for patents to be applied in assessing the postgraduate programs of Medicine III - Capes. Methods: From the reading and analysis of the 2013 area documents of all the 48 areas of Capes, a proposal for metrics for patents was developed to be applied in Medicine III programs. Results: Except for the areas Biotechnology, Food Science, Biological Sciences III, Physical Education, Engineering I, III and IV and Interdisciplinary, most areas do not adopt a scoring system for patents. The proposal developed was based on the criteria of Biotechnology, with adaptations. In general, it will be valued, in ascending order, the deposit, the granting and licensing/production. It will also be assigned higher scores to patents registered abroad and whenever there is a participation of students. Conclusion: This proposal can be applied to the item Intellectual Production of the evaluation form, in subsection Technical Production/Patents. The percentage of 10% for academic programs and 40% for Masters Professionals should be maintained. The program will be scored as Very Good when it reaches 400 points or over; Good, between 200 and 399 points; Regular, between 71 and 199 points; Weak up to 70 points; Insufficient, no punctuation.
id CBC-1_e7ca65fbc695fd797628a8e5d95ef553
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912015000800034
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTSIntellectual propertyPatentsClassificationLicensure Objective: To develop a proposal for metrics for patents to be applied in assessing the postgraduate programs of Medicine III - Capes. Methods: From the reading and analysis of the 2013 area documents of all the 48 areas of Capes, a proposal for metrics for patents was developed to be applied in Medicine III programs. Results: Except for the areas Biotechnology, Food Science, Biological Sciences III, Physical Education, Engineering I, III and IV and Interdisciplinary, most areas do not adopt a scoring system for patents. The proposal developed was based on the criteria of Biotechnology, with adaptations. In general, it will be valued, in ascending order, the deposit, the granting and licensing/production. It will also be assigned higher scores to patents registered abroad and whenever there is a participation of students. Conclusion: This proposal can be applied to the item Intellectual Production of the evaluation form, in subsection Technical Production/Patents. The percentage of 10% for academic programs and 40% for Masters Professionals should be maintained. The program will be scored as Very Good when it reaches 400 points or over; Good, between 200 and 399 points; Regular, between 71 and 199 points; Weak up to 70 points; Insufficient, no punctuation.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 suppl.1 2015reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-69912015S01013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga,Daniela FrancescatoFerreira,Lydia Masakoeng2016-07-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912015000800034Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2016-07-19T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
title METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
spellingShingle METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
Veiga,Daniela Francescato
Intellectual property
Patents
Classification
Licensure
title_short METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
title_full METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
title_fullStr METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
title_full_unstemmed METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
title_sort METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
author Veiga,Daniela Francescato
author_facet Veiga,Daniela Francescato
Ferreira,Lydia Masako
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Lydia Masako
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Veiga,Daniela Francescato
Ferreira,Lydia Masako
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intellectual property
Patents
Classification
Licensure
topic Intellectual property
Patents
Classification
Licensure
description Objective: To develop a proposal for metrics for patents to be applied in assessing the postgraduate programs of Medicine III - Capes. Methods: From the reading and analysis of the 2013 area documents of all the 48 areas of Capes, a proposal for metrics for patents was developed to be applied in Medicine III programs. Results: Except for the areas Biotechnology, Food Science, Biological Sciences III, Physical Education, Engineering I, III and IV and Interdisciplinary, most areas do not adopt a scoring system for patents. The proposal developed was based on the criteria of Biotechnology, with adaptations. In general, it will be valued, in ascending order, the deposit, the granting and licensing/production. It will also be assigned higher scores to patents registered abroad and whenever there is a participation of students. Conclusion: This proposal can be applied to the item Intellectual Production of the evaluation form, in subsection Technical Production/Patents. The percentage of 10% for academic programs and 40% for Masters Professionals should be maintained. The program will be scored as Very Good when it reaches 400 points or over; Good, between 200 and 399 points; Regular, between 71 and 199 points; Weak up to 70 points; Insufficient, no punctuation.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-69912015S01013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 suppl.1 2015
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209213196795904