METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034 |
Resumo: | Objective: To develop a proposal for metrics for patents to be applied in assessing the postgraduate programs of Medicine III - Capes. Methods: From the reading and analysis of the 2013 area documents of all the 48 areas of Capes, a proposal for metrics for patents was developed to be applied in Medicine III programs. Results: Except for the areas Biotechnology, Food Science, Biological Sciences III, Physical Education, Engineering I, III and IV and Interdisciplinary, most areas do not adopt a scoring system for patents. The proposal developed was based on the criteria of Biotechnology, with adaptations. In general, it will be valued, in ascending order, the deposit, the granting and licensing/production. It will also be assigned higher scores to patents registered abroad and whenever there is a participation of students. Conclusion: This proposal can be applied to the item Intellectual Production of the evaluation form, in subsection Technical Production/Patents. The percentage of 10% for academic programs and 40% for Masters Professionals should be maintained. The program will be scored as Very Good when it reaches 400 points or over; Good, between 200 and 399 points; Regular, between 71 and 199 points; Weak up to 70 points; Insufficient, no punctuation. |
id |
CBC-1_e7ca65fbc695fd797628a8e5d95ef553 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912015000800034 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTSIntellectual propertyPatentsClassificationLicensure Objective: To develop a proposal for metrics for patents to be applied in assessing the postgraduate programs of Medicine III - Capes. Methods: From the reading and analysis of the 2013 area documents of all the 48 areas of Capes, a proposal for metrics for patents was developed to be applied in Medicine III programs. Results: Except for the areas Biotechnology, Food Science, Biological Sciences III, Physical Education, Engineering I, III and IV and Interdisciplinary, most areas do not adopt a scoring system for patents. The proposal developed was based on the criteria of Biotechnology, with adaptations. In general, it will be valued, in ascending order, the deposit, the granting and licensing/production. It will also be assigned higher scores to patents registered abroad and whenever there is a participation of students. Conclusion: This proposal can be applied to the item Intellectual Production of the evaluation form, in subsection Technical Production/Patents. The percentage of 10% for academic programs and 40% for Masters Professionals should be maintained. The program will be scored as Very Good when it reaches 400 points or over; Good, between 200 and 399 points; Regular, between 71 and 199 points; Weak up to 70 points; Insufficient, no punctuation.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 suppl.1 2015reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-69912015S01013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga,Daniela FrancescatoFerreira,Lydia Masakoeng2016-07-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912015000800034Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2016-07-19T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
title |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
spellingShingle |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS Veiga,Daniela Francescato Intellectual property Patents Classification Licensure |
title_short |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
title_full |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
title_fullStr |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
title_sort |
METRICS DEVELOPMENT FOR PATENTS |
author |
Veiga,Daniela Francescato |
author_facet |
Veiga,Daniela Francescato Ferreira,Lydia Masako |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Lydia Masako |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Veiga,Daniela Francescato Ferreira,Lydia Masako |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intellectual property Patents Classification Licensure |
topic |
Intellectual property Patents Classification Licensure |
description |
Objective: To develop a proposal for metrics for patents to be applied in assessing the postgraduate programs of Medicine III - Capes. Methods: From the reading and analysis of the 2013 area documents of all the 48 areas of Capes, a proposal for metrics for patents was developed to be applied in Medicine III programs. Results: Except for the areas Biotechnology, Food Science, Biological Sciences III, Physical Education, Engineering I, III and IV and Interdisciplinary, most areas do not adopt a scoring system for patents. The proposal developed was based on the criteria of Biotechnology, with adaptations. In general, it will be valued, in ascending order, the deposit, the granting and licensing/production. It will also be assigned higher scores to patents registered abroad and whenever there is a participation of students. Conclusion: This proposal can be applied to the item Intellectual Production of the evaluation form, in subsection Technical Production/Patents. The percentage of 10% for academic programs and 40% for Masters Professionals should be maintained. The program will be scored as Very Good when it reaches 400 points or over; Good, between 200 and 399 points; Regular, between 71 and 199 points; Weak up to 70 points; Insufficient, no punctuation. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800034 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-69912015S01013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 suppl.1 2015 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209213196795904 |