Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hida,Wilson Takashi
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta, Kara-José Junior,Newton, Alves,Emerson, Tadeu,Marcel, Cordeiro,Lívio Neiva, Nakano,Celso Takashi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492009000400017
Resumo: PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcome, contrast sensitivity and wavefront analysis of patients that underwent cataract surgery and implantation of AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal intraocular lens with those who received the AcrySof SN60AT monofocal IOL. METHODS: This was a prospective clinical trial of forty eyes that received the multifocal IOL and thirty-two eyes that received the monofocal IOL after phacoemulsification. RESULTS: Values for total and spherical aberrations in the multifocal group were statistically lower than in the monofocal group. In the monofocal group, 75% achieved uncorrected intermediate visual acuities between Jaeger 1 and 6. In the multifocal group, 75% of the eyes achieved more than Jaeger 6. At least 87.5% of the multifocal group and 6.3% of the monofocal group achieved monocular uncorrected near acuity of 20/30 (J2, N5) or better. And 90.0% of the eyes in the multifocal group and 37.5% in the monofocal group achieved an uncorrected near acuity of 20/40 (J3, N6) or better. The mean spherical error was 0.11 D in the multifocal group and -0.18 D in the monofocal group (p=0.0379). The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group had low contrast sensitivity (log units) with statistically significant differences in 6.0 cpd in photopic conditions (p=0.014) and the SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group had higher contrast sensitivity (log units) under mesopic conditions (p=0.044). CONCLUSION: The multifocal IOLs induced less spherical aberration than monofocal IOLs and predictably good uncorrected distance and uncorrected near acuities. However, contrast sensitivity was lower in the multifocal group.
id CBO-2_c50c6262b14104f66ec2c667dc569da0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27492009000400017
network_acronym_str CBO-2
network_name_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lensesIntraocular lensesLens implantation, intraocularCataractPhacoemulsificationVisual acuityPURPOSE: To compare the visual outcome, contrast sensitivity and wavefront analysis of patients that underwent cataract surgery and implantation of AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal intraocular lens with those who received the AcrySof SN60AT monofocal IOL. METHODS: This was a prospective clinical trial of forty eyes that received the multifocal IOL and thirty-two eyes that received the monofocal IOL after phacoemulsification. RESULTS: Values for total and spherical aberrations in the multifocal group were statistically lower than in the monofocal group. In the monofocal group, 75% achieved uncorrected intermediate visual acuities between Jaeger 1 and 6. In the multifocal group, 75% of the eyes achieved more than Jaeger 6. At least 87.5% of the multifocal group and 6.3% of the monofocal group achieved monocular uncorrected near acuity of 20/30 (J2, N5) or better. And 90.0% of the eyes in the multifocal group and 37.5% in the monofocal group achieved an uncorrected near acuity of 20/40 (J3, N6) or better. The mean spherical error was 0.11 D in the multifocal group and -0.18 D in the monofocal group (p=0.0379). The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group had low contrast sensitivity (log units) with statistically significant differences in 6.0 cpd in photopic conditions (p=0.014) and the SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group had higher contrast sensitivity (log units) under mesopic conditions (p=0.044). CONCLUSION: The multifocal IOLs induced less spherical aberration than monofocal IOLs and predictably good uncorrected distance and uncorrected near acuities. However, contrast sensitivity was lower in the multifocal group.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492009000400017Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.72 n.4 2009reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.1590/S0004-27492009000400017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHida,Wilson TakashiMotta,Antonio Francisco PimentaKara-José Junior,NewtonAlves,EmersonTadeu,MarcelCordeiro,Lívio NeivaNakano,Celso Takashieng2009-10-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492009000400017Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2009-10-06T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
title Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
spellingShingle Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
Hida,Wilson Takashi
Intraocular lenses
Lens implantation, intraocular
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Visual acuity
title_short Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
title_full Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
title_fullStr Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
title_sort Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses
author Hida,Wilson Takashi
author_facet Hida,Wilson Takashi
Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta
Kara-José Junior,Newton
Alves,Emerson
Tadeu,Marcel
Cordeiro,Lívio Neiva
Nakano,Celso Takashi
author_role author
author2 Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta
Kara-José Junior,Newton
Alves,Emerson
Tadeu,Marcel
Cordeiro,Lívio Neiva
Nakano,Celso Takashi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hida,Wilson Takashi
Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta
Kara-José Junior,Newton
Alves,Emerson
Tadeu,Marcel
Cordeiro,Lívio Neiva
Nakano,Celso Takashi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intraocular lenses
Lens implantation, intraocular
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Visual acuity
topic Intraocular lenses
Lens implantation, intraocular
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Visual acuity
description PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcome, contrast sensitivity and wavefront analysis of patients that underwent cataract surgery and implantation of AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal intraocular lens with those who received the AcrySof SN60AT monofocal IOL. METHODS: This was a prospective clinical trial of forty eyes that received the multifocal IOL and thirty-two eyes that received the monofocal IOL after phacoemulsification. RESULTS: Values for total and spherical aberrations in the multifocal group were statistically lower than in the monofocal group. In the monofocal group, 75% achieved uncorrected intermediate visual acuities between Jaeger 1 and 6. In the multifocal group, 75% of the eyes achieved more than Jaeger 6. At least 87.5% of the multifocal group and 6.3% of the monofocal group achieved monocular uncorrected near acuity of 20/30 (J2, N5) or better. And 90.0% of the eyes in the multifocal group and 37.5% in the monofocal group achieved an uncorrected near acuity of 20/40 (J3, N6) or better. The mean spherical error was 0.11 D in the multifocal group and -0.18 D in the monofocal group (p=0.0379). The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group had low contrast sensitivity (log units) with statistically significant differences in 6.0 cpd in photopic conditions (p=0.014) and the SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group had higher contrast sensitivity (log units) under mesopic conditions (p=0.044). CONCLUSION: The multifocal IOLs induced less spherical aberration than monofocal IOLs and predictably good uncorrected distance and uncorrected near acuities. However, contrast sensitivity was lower in the multifocal group.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492009000400017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492009000400017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0004-27492009000400017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.72 n.4 2009
reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron:CBO
instname_str Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron_str CBO
institution CBO
reponame_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
collection Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br
_version_ 1754209025970405376