Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Salvador, Daniel Fabio, Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento, Abrantes, Jaime Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: EAD em Foco
Texto Completo: https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223
Resumo:  In the last century, Collaborative Learning with Computer Support (CSCL) presents itself as the new basis of learning sciences. It seeks to clarify how learning within groups can promote, through technology, the interaction and collaboration of participants, through knowledge exchange. We took Murphy's research as a theoretical reference to verify the collaboration between Science and Biology teachers to construct teaching proposals. The objective was to evaluate different pedagogical strategies in the forums for the collaborative construction of teaching proposals by teachers in initial and continuing training, triangulating with the collaboration categories in two forums of two online refresher courses offered by the CECIERJ Foundation extension. Content analysis was carried out to verify these categories and then correlated with the factor whether or not there was mediation. A total of 137 course participants divided into twelve groups were involved in the research. The number of collaborations and the percentages of the categories that occurred in the forums in both courses were counted. During the study, it was found that forums made up of small groups were effective in building shared objectives and artifacts, thus reaching the most advanced levels of collaborative knowledge construction. The activity with a more closed and complex strategy, developed in Forum 2 of the courses (with and without mediation) was where the collaboration categories diversified the most and presented the greatest results. The proposal to work with small groups (around 10 participants) presented itself as an important alternative for deeper and more meaningful collaborative constructions of teaching and knowledge proposals.   Keywords: Online discussion forums. Collaborative learning. Knowledge construction. Mediation.
id CECIERJ_21d10f617c2310b53381ba3d22b18642
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/2223
network_acronym_str CECIERJ
network_name_str EAD em Foco
repository_id_str
spelling Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of MediationConstrução Colaborativa Online de Propostas de Ensino de Ciências e Biologia: Níveis de Colaboração e Impactos da MediaçãoFóruns de discussão onlineAprendizagem colaborativaConstrução do conhecimentoMediaçãoOnline discussion forumsCollaborative learning Knowledge constructionMediation In the last century, Collaborative Learning with Computer Support (CSCL) presents itself as the new basis of learning sciences. It seeks to clarify how learning within groups can promote, through technology, the interaction and collaboration of participants, through knowledge exchange. We took Murphy's research as a theoretical reference to verify the collaboration between Science and Biology teachers to construct teaching proposals. The objective was to evaluate different pedagogical strategies in the forums for the collaborative construction of teaching proposals by teachers in initial and continuing training, triangulating with the collaboration categories in two forums of two online refresher courses offered by the CECIERJ Foundation extension. Content analysis was carried out to verify these categories and then correlated with the factor whether or not there was mediation. A total of 137 course participants divided into twelve groups were involved in the research. The number of collaborations and the percentages of the categories that occurred in the forums in both courses were counted. During the study, it was found that forums made up of small groups were effective in building shared objectives and artifacts, thus reaching the most advanced levels of collaborative knowledge construction. The activity with a more closed and complex strategy, developed in Forum 2 of the courses (with and without mediation) was where the collaboration categories diversified the most and presented the greatest results. The proposal to work with small groups (around 10 participants) presented itself as an important alternative for deeper and more meaningful collaborative constructions of teaching and knowledge proposals.   Keywords: Online discussion forums. Collaborative learning. Knowledge construction. Mediation.Neste último século a Aprendizagem Colaborativa com Suporte Computacional (CSCL) se apresenta como a nova base das ciências da aprendizagem. Ela busca esclarecer como a aprendizagem dentro de grupos, consegue promover, por meio da tecnologia, a interação e a colaboração dos participantes, por meio das trocas de conhecimento. Tomamos por referencial teórico a pesquisa de Murphy para verificarmos a colaboração entre professores de Ciências e Biologia para construção de propostas de ensino. O objetivo foi avaliar diferentes estratégias pedagógicas dos fóruns para construção colaborativa de propostas de ensino por professores em formação inicial e continuada, triangulando com as categorias de colaboração em dois fóruns de dois cursos de atualização online da extensão da Fundação CECIERJ. Realizou-se a análise de conteúdo para verificar essas categorias e depois correlacionou-se com o fator ter ou não mediação. Estiveram envolvidos na pesquisa um total de 137 cursistas divididos em doze grupos. Foram contabilizados os números de colaborações e os percentuais das categorias que ocorreram nos fóruns em ambos os cursos. Constatou-se, no decorrer do estudo, que os fóruns constituídos por pequenos grupos foram eficazes na construção de objetivos e artefatos partilhados, atingindo assim os níveis mais avançados de construção colaborativa de conhecimento. A atividade com estratégia mais fechada e complexa, desenvolvida no Fórum 2 dos cursos (com e sem mediação) foi onde as categorias de colaboração mais se diversificaram e se apresentaram com maiores resultados. A proposta de trabalhar com pequenos grupos (em torno de 10 participantes) apresentou-se como alternativa importante para construções colaborativas mais profundas e significativas de propostas de ensino e conhecimento.   Palavras-chave: Fóruns de discussão online. Aprendizagem colaborativa. Construção do conhecimento. Mediação.Fundação Cecierj2024-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/222310.18264/eadf.v14i1.2223EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024); e2223EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024); e2223EaD em Foco; v. 14 n. 1 (2024); e22232177-8310reponame:EAD em Focoinstname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)instacron:CECIERJporhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223/902Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Focohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Vicente, Regiane TrigueiroSalvador, Daniel FabioSpiegel, Carolina NascimentoAbrantes, Jaime Antonio2024-04-03T18:47:12Zoai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/2223Revistahttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/RevistaONGhttp://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/oai||eademfoco@cecierj.edu.br2177-83102177-8310opendoar:2024-04-03T18:47:12EAD em Foco - Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
Construção Colaborativa Online de Propostas de Ensino de Ciências e Biologia: Níveis de Colaboração e Impactos da Mediação
title Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
spellingShingle Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro
Fóruns de discussão online
Aprendizagem colaborativa
Construção do conhecimento
Mediação
Online discussion forums
Collaborative learning
Knowledge construction
Mediation
title_short Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
title_full Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
title_fullStr Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
title_full_unstemmed Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
title_sort Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
author Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro
author_facet Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro
Salvador, Daniel Fabio
Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento
Abrantes, Jaime Antonio
author_role author
author2 Salvador, Daniel Fabio
Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento
Abrantes, Jaime Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro
Salvador, Daniel Fabio
Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento
Abrantes, Jaime Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fóruns de discussão online
Aprendizagem colaborativa
Construção do conhecimento
Mediação
Online discussion forums
Collaborative learning
Knowledge construction
Mediation
topic Fóruns de discussão online
Aprendizagem colaborativa
Construção do conhecimento
Mediação
Online discussion forums
Collaborative learning
Knowledge construction
Mediation
description  In the last century, Collaborative Learning with Computer Support (CSCL) presents itself as the new basis of learning sciences. It seeks to clarify how learning within groups can promote, through technology, the interaction and collaboration of participants, through knowledge exchange. We took Murphy's research as a theoretical reference to verify the collaboration between Science and Biology teachers to construct teaching proposals. The objective was to evaluate different pedagogical strategies in the forums for the collaborative construction of teaching proposals by teachers in initial and continuing training, triangulating with the collaboration categories in two forums of two online refresher courses offered by the CECIERJ Foundation extension. Content analysis was carried out to verify these categories and then correlated with the factor whether or not there was mediation. A total of 137 course participants divided into twelve groups were involved in the research. The number of collaborations and the percentages of the categories that occurred in the forums in both courses were counted. During the study, it was found that forums made up of small groups were effective in building shared objectives and artifacts, thus reaching the most advanced levels of collaborative knowledge construction. The activity with a more closed and complex strategy, developed in Forum 2 of the courses (with and without mediation) was where the collaboration categories diversified the most and presented the greatest results. The proposal to work with small groups (around 10 participants) presented itself as an important alternative for deeper and more meaningful collaborative constructions of teaching and knowledge proposals.   Keywords: Online discussion forums. Collaborative learning. Knowledge construction. Mediation.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223
10.18264/eadf.v14i1.2223
url https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223
identifier_str_mv 10.18264/eadf.v14i1.2223
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223/902
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Foco
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Foco
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cecierj
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cecierj
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024); e2223
EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024); e2223
EaD em Foco; v. 14 n. 1 (2024); e2223
2177-8310
reponame:EAD em Foco
instname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)
instacron:CECIERJ
instname_str Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)
instacron_str CECIERJ
institution CECIERJ
reponame_str EAD em Foco
collection EAD em Foco
repository.name.fl_str_mv EAD em Foco - Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||eademfoco@cecierj.edu.br
_version_ 1814253788230320128