Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | EAD em Foco |
Texto Completo: | https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223 |
Resumo: | In the last century, Collaborative Learning with Computer Support (CSCL) presents itself as the new basis of learning sciences. It seeks to clarify how learning within groups can promote, through technology, the interaction and collaboration of participants, through knowledge exchange. We took Murphy's research as a theoretical reference to verify the collaboration between Science and Biology teachers to construct teaching proposals. The objective was to evaluate different pedagogical strategies in the forums for the collaborative construction of teaching proposals by teachers in initial and continuing training, triangulating with the collaboration categories in two forums of two online refresher courses offered by the CECIERJ Foundation extension. Content analysis was carried out to verify these categories and then correlated with the factor whether or not there was mediation. A total of 137 course participants divided into twelve groups were involved in the research. The number of collaborations and the percentages of the categories that occurred in the forums in both courses were counted. During the study, it was found that forums made up of small groups were effective in building shared objectives and artifacts, thus reaching the most advanced levels of collaborative knowledge construction. The activity with a more closed and complex strategy, developed in Forum 2 of the courses (with and without mediation) was where the collaboration categories diversified the most and presented the greatest results. The proposal to work with small groups (around 10 participants) presented itself as an important alternative for deeper and more meaningful collaborative constructions of teaching and knowledge proposals. Keywords: Online discussion forums. Collaborative learning. Knowledge construction. Mediation. |
id |
CECIERJ_21d10f617c2310b53381ba3d22b18642 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/2223 |
network_acronym_str |
CECIERJ |
network_name_str |
EAD em Foco |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of MediationConstrução Colaborativa Online de Propostas de Ensino de Ciências e Biologia: Níveis de Colaboração e Impactos da MediaçãoFóruns de discussão onlineAprendizagem colaborativaConstrução do conhecimentoMediaçãoOnline discussion forumsCollaborative learning Knowledge constructionMediation In the last century, Collaborative Learning with Computer Support (CSCL) presents itself as the new basis of learning sciences. It seeks to clarify how learning within groups can promote, through technology, the interaction and collaboration of participants, through knowledge exchange. We took Murphy's research as a theoretical reference to verify the collaboration between Science and Biology teachers to construct teaching proposals. The objective was to evaluate different pedagogical strategies in the forums for the collaborative construction of teaching proposals by teachers in initial and continuing training, triangulating with the collaboration categories in two forums of two online refresher courses offered by the CECIERJ Foundation extension. Content analysis was carried out to verify these categories and then correlated with the factor whether or not there was mediation. A total of 137 course participants divided into twelve groups were involved in the research. The number of collaborations and the percentages of the categories that occurred in the forums in both courses were counted. During the study, it was found that forums made up of small groups were effective in building shared objectives and artifacts, thus reaching the most advanced levels of collaborative knowledge construction. The activity with a more closed and complex strategy, developed in Forum 2 of the courses (with and without mediation) was where the collaboration categories diversified the most and presented the greatest results. The proposal to work with small groups (around 10 participants) presented itself as an important alternative for deeper and more meaningful collaborative constructions of teaching and knowledge proposals. Keywords: Online discussion forums. Collaborative learning. Knowledge construction. Mediation.Neste último século a Aprendizagem Colaborativa com Suporte Computacional (CSCL) se apresenta como a nova base das ciências da aprendizagem. Ela busca esclarecer como a aprendizagem dentro de grupos, consegue promover, por meio da tecnologia, a interação e a colaboração dos participantes, por meio das trocas de conhecimento. Tomamos por referencial teórico a pesquisa de Murphy para verificarmos a colaboração entre professores de Ciências e Biologia para construção de propostas de ensino. O objetivo foi avaliar diferentes estratégias pedagógicas dos fóruns para construção colaborativa de propostas de ensino por professores em formação inicial e continuada, triangulando com as categorias de colaboração em dois fóruns de dois cursos de atualização online da extensão da Fundação CECIERJ. Realizou-se a análise de conteúdo para verificar essas categorias e depois correlacionou-se com o fator ter ou não mediação. Estiveram envolvidos na pesquisa um total de 137 cursistas divididos em doze grupos. Foram contabilizados os números de colaborações e os percentuais das categorias que ocorreram nos fóruns em ambos os cursos. Constatou-se, no decorrer do estudo, que os fóruns constituídos por pequenos grupos foram eficazes na construção de objetivos e artefatos partilhados, atingindo assim os níveis mais avançados de construção colaborativa de conhecimento. A atividade com estratégia mais fechada e complexa, desenvolvida no Fórum 2 dos cursos (com e sem mediação) foi onde as categorias de colaboração mais se diversificaram e se apresentaram com maiores resultados. A proposta de trabalhar com pequenos grupos (em torno de 10 participantes) apresentou-se como alternativa importante para construções colaborativas mais profundas e significativas de propostas de ensino e conhecimento. Palavras-chave: Fóruns de discussão online. Aprendizagem colaborativa. Construção do conhecimento. Mediação.Fundação Cecierj2024-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/222310.18264/eadf.v14i1.2223EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024); e2223EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024); e2223EaD em Foco; v. 14 n. 1 (2024); e22232177-8310reponame:EAD em Focoinstname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)instacron:CECIERJporhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223/902Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Focohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Vicente, Regiane TrigueiroSalvador, Daniel FabioSpiegel, Carolina NascimentoAbrantes, Jaime Antonio2024-04-03T18:47:12Zoai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/2223Revistahttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/RevistaONGhttp://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/oai||eademfoco@cecierj.edu.br2177-83102177-8310opendoar:2024-04-03T18:47:12EAD em Foco - Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation Construção Colaborativa Online de Propostas de Ensino de Ciências e Biologia: Níveis de Colaboração e Impactos da Mediação |
title |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation |
spellingShingle |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro Fóruns de discussão online Aprendizagem colaborativa Construção do conhecimento Mediação Online discussion forums Collaborative learning Knowledge construction Mediation |
title_short |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation |
title_full |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation |
title_fullStr |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation |
title_sort |
Online Collaborative Construction of Biology and Science Teaching Proposals: Levels of Collaboration and Impacts of Mediation |
author |
Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro |
author_facet |
Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro Salvador, Daniel Fabio Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento Abrantes, Jaime Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salvador, Daniel Fabio Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento Abrantes, Jaime Antonio |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vicente, Regiane Trigueiro Salvador, Daniel Fabio Spiegel, Carolina Nascimento Abrantes, Jaime Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fóruns de discussão online Aprendizagem colaborativa Construção do conhecimento Mediação Online discussion forums Collaborative learning Knowledge construction Mediation |
topic |
Fóruns de discussão online Aprendizagem colaborativa Construção do conhecimento Mediação Online discussion forums Collaborative learning Knowledge construction Mediation |
description |
In the last century, Collaborative Learning with Computer Support (CSCL) presents itself as the new basis of learning sciences. It seeks to clarify how learning within groups can promote, through technology, the interaction and collaboration of participants, through knowledge exchange. We took Murphy's research as a theoretical reference to verify the collaboration between Science and Biology teachers to construct teaching proposals. The objective was to evaluate different pedagogical strategies in the forums for the collaborative construction of teaching proposals by teachers in initial and continuing training, triangulating with the collaboration categories in two forums of two online refresher courses offered by the CECIERJ Foundation extension. Content analysis was carried out to verify these categories and then correlated with the factor whether or not there was mediation. A total of 137 course participants divided into twelve groups were involved in the research. The number of collaborations and the percentages of the categories that occurred in the forums in both courses were counted. During the study, it was found that forums made up of small groups were effective in building shared objectives and artifacts, thus reaching the most advanced levels of collaborative knowledge construction. The activity with a more closed and complex strategy, developed in Forum 2 of the courses (with and without mediation) was where the collaboration categories diversified the most and presented the greatest results. The proposal to work with small groups (around 10 participants) presented itself as an important alternative for deeper and more meaningful collaborative constructions of teaching and knowledge proposals. Keywords: Online discussion forums. Collaborative learning. Knowledge construction. Mediation. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223 10.18264/eadf.v14i1.2223 |
url |
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18264/eadf.v14i1.2223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2223/902 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Foco https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Foco https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cecierj |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cecierj |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024); e2223 EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024); e2223 EaD em Foco; v. 14 n. 1 (2024); e2223 2177-8310 reponame:EAD em Foco instname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ) instacron:CECIERJ |
instname_str |
Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ) |
instacron_str |
CECIERJ |
institution |
CECIERJ |
reponame_str |
EAD em Foco |
collection |
EAD em Foco |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
EAD em Foco - Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||eademfoco@cecierj.edu.br |
_version_ |
1814253788230320128 |