Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neuenfeldt, Derli Juliano
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Michel, Raquel Cristina, Schuck, Rogério José, Neuenfeldt, Adriano Edo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: EAD em Foco
Texto Completo: https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552
Resumo: This paper analyzed the perception from undergraduate students of thelive modality over the differences related to virtualized synchronousteaching experienced throughout 2020. The investigation is bothqualitative and descriptive, and it occurred in an institution of HighEducation in RS/Brazil. The data was collected through a questionnaireorganized in Google Forms, which was answered by 245 students.Regarding students’ perceptions, it was possible to determine that, invirtualized teaching, it is not necessary to waste time traveling to theinstitution to have classes: students can study in the comfort of their ownhomes. There are, however, some issues, such as not finding anappropriate place to study or not having access to a stable internetconnection. Virtualized synchronous classes make it possible for studentsto learn from the comfort of their own homes. Educators become moreavailable to offer help by using digital resources. It also became easier forother professionals to dialogue and share experiences with the students. Itwas possible, as well, to learn how to make better use of digital resources.However, in the questionnaire, students highlighted there is moreinteraction with the lecturer in live teaching. Furthermore, the studentsfound it easier to concentrate during classes when being there in person.Besides, according to the answers, the learning that occurs in practicallessons is essential to professional training, and these cannot easily bereplaced in a virtualized environment. In conclusion, both virtual and liveteaching present positive aspects regarding the processes of learning andteaching. Therefore, by using the best of what live and virtual teaching canoffer, hybrid teaching is a valid and possible way to perform HighEducation. Keywords: High education. Hybrid education. Virtual classes. Covid-19.
id CECIERJ_4ebb5c5b7eb5d43f604ae82fdfb469b8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/1552
network_acronym_str CECIERJ
network_name_str EAD em Foco
repository_id_str
spelling Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teachingDiferenças entre Ensino Presencial e Virtual: Percepções de Estudantes da GraduaçãoThis paper analyzed the perception from undergraduate students of thelive modality over the differences related to virtualized synchronousteaching experienced throughout 2020. The investigation is bothqualitative and descriptive, and it occurred in an institution of HighEducation in RS/Brazil. The data was collected through a questionnaireorganized in Google Forms, which was answered by 245 students.Regarding students’ perceptions, it was possible to determine that, invirtualized teaching, it is not necessary to waste time traveling to theinstitution to have classes: students can study in the comfort of their ownhomes. There are, however, some issues, such as not finding anappropriate place to study or not having access to a stable internetconnection. Virtualized synchronous classes make it possible for studentsto learn from the comfort of their own homes. Educators become moreavailable to offer help by using digital resources. It also became easier forother professionals to dialogue and share experiences with the students. Itwas possible, as well, to learn how to make better use of digital resources.However, in the questionnaire, students highlighted there is moreinteraction with the lecturer in live teaching. Furthermore, the studentsfound it easier to concentrate during classes when being there in person.Besides, according to the answers, the learning that occurs in practicallessons is essential to professional training, and these cannot easily bereplaced in a virtualized environment. In conclusion, both virtual and liveteaching present positive aspects regarding the processes of learning andteaching. Therefore, by using the best of what live and virtual teaching canoffer, hybrid teaching is a valid and possible way to perform HighEducation. Keywords: High education. Hybrid education. Virtual classes. Covid-19.Este artigo analisa percepções de estudantes de graduação damodalidade presencial, quanto às diferenças em relação ao ensinovirtualizado síncrono, experimentado em 2020. A pesquisa, que ocorreunuma Instituição de Ensino Superior do RS/BRA, caracteriza-se comoqualitativa e descritiva. A coleta de informações foi realizada por meio deum questionário elaborado no Google Forms, respondido por 245estudantes. Constatou-se, segundo as percepções dos estudantes, que,no ensino virtualizado, há ganho de tempo, visto que não é necessário odeslocamento até a instituição para participar das aulas, maspermanecem problemas substanciais em relação ao espaço físicoadequado e à conexão à internet. O estudo pode ser realizado no confortodo lar, com maior disponibilidade dos professores para sanar dúvidas, pormeio de recursos digitais. Foram percebidas facilidades relativas àparticipação (virtual) de profissionais que se dispõem a dialogar com osalunos, trazendo relatos de experiências. Percebeu-se também maioraprendizagem a respeito do uso das tecnologias digitais. Nas respostasdos formulários os estudantes, destacaram que no ensino presencial hámaior interação com o professor e mais facilidade em se concentrar nasaulas. Ressaltaram ainda que a aprendizagem nas aulas práticas éessencial para a formação profissional e que elas não podem sersubstituídas por aulas virtuais. Conclui-se que tanto o ensino virtual Revista EaD em Foco, 2021, v.11: e1552 2quanto o presencial apresentam pontos positivos para os processos deensino e de aprendizagem. Dessa forma, o ensino híbrido pode serconsiderado um caminho válido para o Ensino Superior, agregando o quehá de melhor no ensino presencial e no ensino virtual. Palavras-chave: Ensino superior. Ensino híbrido. Aulas virtuais. Covid-19.Fundação Cecierj2021-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552EaD em Foco; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): DL Contributions in times of pandemic and post-pandemic (Part II/II)EaD em Foco; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2021): Edición especial - Educación a distancia en tiempos de pandemia y pospandémica (Parte 2/2)EaD em Foco; v. 11 n. 2 (2021): Edição Especial - EaD em tempos de pandemia e pós-pandemia (Parte 2/2)2177-8310reponame:EAD em Focoinstname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)instacron:CECIERJporhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552/699https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552/700Copyright (c) 2021 EaD em Focoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeuenfeldt, Derli JulianoMichel, Raquel CristinaSchuck, Rogério JoséNeuenfeldt, Adriano Edo2022-01-01T16:41:54ZRevistahttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/RevistaONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
Diferenças entre Ensino Presencial e Virtual: Percepções de Estudantes da Graduação
title Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
spellingShingle Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
Neuenfeldt, Derli Juliano
title_short Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
title_full Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
title_fullStr Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
title_full_unstemmed Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
title_sort Graduation Students’ Perceptions on the Differences between Live and Virtual teaching
author Neuenfeldt, Derli Juliano
author_facet Neuenfeldt, Derli Juliano
Michel, Raquel Cristina
Schuck, Rogério José
Neuenfeldt, Adriano Edo
author_role author
author2 Michel, Raquel Cristina
Schuck, Rogério José
Neuenfeldt, Adriano Edo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neuenfeldt, Derli Juliano
Michel, Raquel Cristina
Schuck, Rogério José
Neuenfeldt, Adriano Edo
description This paper analyzed the perception from undergraduate students of thelive modality over the differences related to virtualized synchronousteaching experienced throughout 2020. The investigation is bothqualitative and descriptive, and it occurred in an institution of HighEducation in RS/Brazil. The data was collected through a questionnaireorganized in Google Forms, which was answered by 245 students.Regarding students’ perceptions, it was possible to determine that, invirtualized teaching, it is not necessary to waste time traveling to theinstitution to have classes: students can study in the comfort of their ownhomes. There are, however, some issues, such as not finding anappropriate place to study or not having access to a stable internetconnection. Virtualized synchronous classes make it possible for studentsto learn from the comfort of their own homes. Educators become moreavailable to offer help by using digital resources. It also became easier forother professionals to dialogue and share experiences with the students. Itwas possible, as well, to learn how to make better use of digital resources.However, in the questionnaire, students highlighted there is moreinteraction with the lecturer in live teaching. Furthermore, the studentsfound it easier to concentrate during classes when being there in person.Besides, according to the answers, the learning that occurs in practicallessons is essential to professional training, and these cannot easily bereplaced in a virtualized environment. In conclusion, both virtual and liveteaching present positive aspects regarding the processes of learning andteaching. Therefore, by using the best of what live and virtual teaching canoffer, hybrid teaching is a valid and possible way to perform HighEducation. Keywords: High education. Hybrid education. Virtual classes. Covid-19.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552
url https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552/699
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1552/700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 EaD em Foco
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 EaD em Foco
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cecierj
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cecierj
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv EaD em Foco; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): DL Contributions in times of pandemic and post-pandemic (Part II/II)
EaD em Foco; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2021): Edición especial - Educación a distancia en tiempos de pandemia y pospandémica (Parte 2/2)
EaD em Foco; v. 11 n. 2 (2021): Edição Especial - EaD em tempos de pandemia e pós-pandemia (Parte 2/2)
2177-8310
reponame:EAD em Foco
instname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)
instacron:CECIERJ
instname_str Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)
instacron_str CECIERJ
institution CECIERJ
reponame_str EAD em Foco
collection EAD em Foco
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798316349819191296