Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Título da fonte: | Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/650 |
Resumo: | This article comes from two researches about researchers and professionals in higher education in the Postgraduate Education training policy in two countries, Portugal and Brazil. From the methodological point of view, we analyze the differences and similarities. We use the comparative historical-critical method to detect the discrepancies in the two countries and, in particular, within the Program of Postgraduate Stricto Sensu in Education. It seeks to understand some issues that emerge from the comparison and presents a comparative methodological view on the subject of the researchers training policies . In Brazil, the productivity, which is a principle category in business logic, invaded the academic and educational fields as a whole, developing an unprecedented need for production in the history of Brazilian education. In Portugal, and what can be analyzed from the changes in the parameters of the Bologna Process, the research at the postgraduate level has been primarily influenced by the national agency called Science and Technology Foundation. Thence come the conceptual syntheses presented. |
id |
CESGRANRIO_202345743e31dcdf90dcebf14b846e52 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/650 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRANRIO |
network_name_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programsPolitica de formacion de investigadores: un analisis comparativo (Portugal-Brasil) en el contexto de programas de postgradoAs politicas de formação de pesquisadores: analise comparativa (Portugal-Brasil) em contextos de programas de pos-graduaçãoPolitica de formacion de investigadores; Profesionales de la educacion; Metodologia comparativaResearchers training policy; Professionals in education; Comparative methodologyPesquisa; Politicas públicas; Formação de pesquisadoresThis article comes from two researches about researchers and professionals in higher education in the Postgraduate Education training policy in two countries, Portugal and Brazil. From the methodological point of view, we analyze the differences and similarities. We use the comparative historical-critical method to detect the discrepancies in the two countries and, in particular, within the Program of Postgraduate Stricto Sensu in Education. It seeks to understand some issues that emerge from the comparison and presents a comparative methodological view on the subject of the researchers training policies . In Brazil, the productivity, which is a principle category in business logic, invaded the academic and educational fields as a whole, developing an unprecedented need for production in the history of Brazilian education. In Portugal, and what can be analyzed from the changes in the parameters of the Bologna Process, the research at the postgraduate level has been primarily influenced by the national agency called Science and Technology Foundation. Thence come the conceptual syntheses presented.Este artículo proviene de dos investigaciónes sobre la politica de formacion delos investigadores y los profesionales de la educacion superior en losprogramas de postgrado en Educacion en dos paises, Portugal y Brasil. Desde elpunto de vista metodologico, se analizan las diferencias y similitudes.Usamos elmetodo comparativo historico-critico para detectar las discrepancias en losdos paises y, en particular, dentro del Programa de Postgrado stricto sensu enEducacion. Se trata de entender algunas cuestiones que surgen de lacomparacion y presenta una vision metodologica comparativa sobre el tema delas politicas de formacion de los investigadores. En Brasil, la productividad, quees una categoria de principio en la logica de negocio, invadio el ambitoacademico y educativo en su conjunto, desarrollando la necesidad sinprecedentes de la produccion en la historia de la educacion brasileña. EnPortugal, y lo que puede ser analizado en el cambio de los parametros delproceso de Bolonia, la investigación a nivel de postgrado ha sido influenciadaprincipalmente por el organismo nacional llamado Fundacion para la Ciencia yla Tecnologia. De alli viene la sintesis conceptual presentada.O texto analisa, comparativamente, os marcos referenciais das politicas de formação de pesquisadores em contextos de PPGEd em Portugal e no Brasil sobre politicas de formação de pesquisadores. Utiliza o metodo historico-critico para compreender as questoes que emergem do uso da comparação apresentando dados e sinteses conceituais que subsidiem novas politicas públicas. Parte do pressuposto da importância do conhecimento científico como instrumento potencial para a compreensao deste empreendimento historico, pois, se a educação e incapaz de mudar a sociedade desigual hodierna, ela e fonte relevante para compreensao dos fundamentos da desigualdade e para a geração de uma nova institucionalidade no mundo globalizado.Urge demandar um novo ordenamento social em que a regulacao seja elemento propulsor de novas politicas intencionais e operacionais que fomentem pesquisas de ponta nestes paises e no mundo globalizado.Fundação CesgranrioFerreira, Naura Syria Carapeto2009-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/650Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 17, n. 65 (2009): Revista Ensaio - Out./Dez.; 719-7281809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2pt; en; esDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-08-14T21:24:22Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/650Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2015-08-14T21:24:22Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs Politica de formacion de investigadores: un analisis comparativo (Portugal-Brasil) en el contexto de programas de postgrado As politicas de formação de pesquisadores: analise comparativa (Portugal-Brasil) em contextos de programas de pos-graduação |
title |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs |
spellingShingle |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs Ferreira, Naura Syria Carapeto Politica de formacion de investigadores; Profesionales de la educacion; Metodologia comparativa Researchers training policy; Professionals in education; Comparative methodology Pesquisa; Politicas públicas; Formação de pesquisadores |
title_short |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs |
title_full |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs |
title_fullStr |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs |
title_sort |
Researchers training policy: a comparative analysis (Portugal-Brazil) in context of postgraduate programs |
author |
Ferreira, Naura Syria Carapeto |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Naura Syria Carapeto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Naura Syria Carapeto |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Politica de formacion de investigadores; Profesionales de la educacion; Metodologia comparativa Researchers training policy; Professionals in education; Comparative methodology Pesquisa; Politicas públicas; Formação de pesquisadores |
topic |
Politica de formacion de investigadores; Profesionales de la educacion; Metodologia comparativa Researchers training policy; Professionals in education; Comparative methodology Pesquisa; Politicas públicas; Formação de pesquisadores |
description |
This article comes from two researches about researchers and professionals in higher education in the Postgraduate Education training policy in two countries, Portugal and Brazil. From the methodological point of view, we analyze the differences and similarities. We use the comparative historical-critical method to detect the discrepancies in the two countries and, in particular, within the Program of Postgraduate Stricto Sensu in Education. It seeks to understand some issues that emerge from the comparison and presents a comparative methodological view on the subject of the researchers training policies . In Brazil, the productivity, which is a principle category in business logic, invaded the academic and educational fields as a whole, developing an unprecedented need for production in the history of Brazilian education. In Portugal, and what can be analyzed from the changes in the parameters of the Bologna Process, the research at the postgraduate level has been primarily influenced by the national agency called Science and Technology Foundation. Thence come the conceptual syntheses presented. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-10-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/650 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/650 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
pt; en; es |
language_invalid_str_mv |
pt; en; es |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 17, n. 65 (2009): Revista Ensaio - Out./Dez.; 719-728 1809-4465 0104-4036 reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO-2 |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
institution |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
reponame_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754832031386173440 |