Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the discursive materials of the Digital Notebook “Knowing the 20 goals of the PNE” which features the National Education Plan (PNE) sanctioned in 2014. This Plan legally establishes the goals for the next decade with respect to education. The Digital Notebook makes explicit the agreements on what is said to be preferable for educating according to Brazilian society. The rhetorical analysis by the bias of Argumentation Theory, as proposed by New Rhetoric, is used as methodology and allows examining the argumentative techniques and the reasoning of greater adherence to the established educational actions, as they expose the stated values and where they are supported in this context. The speeches use figures of amplification and other reasoning which establish the usual and familiar arguments between the speaker and the audience in this document. The belief in the possibility of modifying values in conjunction to the representation of determined and determinable schooling journey are the premises for the development of the arguments that justify the PNE goals. |
id |
CESGRANRIO_3269c4e15b186fb61d6c4c9d944104a8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/388 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRANRIO |
network_name_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan presentAnalisis de los argumentos que presentan las 20 metas del plan nacional de educacionAnalise dos argumentos que apresentam as 20 metas do Plano Nacional de EducaçãoEducational policies; Educational legislation; ArgumentationPoliticas educativas; Legislacion educativa; ArgumentacionEducaçãoPoliticas educacionais; Legislação educacional; ArgumentaçãoThis article aims to analyze the discursive materials of the Digital Notebook “Knowing the 20 goals of the PNE” which features the National Education Plan (PNE) sanctioned in 2014. This Plan legally establishes the goals for the next decade with respect to education. The Digital Notebook makes explicit the agreements on what is said to be preferable for educating according to Brazilian society. The rhetorical analysis by the bias of Argumentation Theory, as proposed by New Rhetoric, is used as methodology and allows examining the argumentative techniques and the reasoning of greater adherence to the established educational actions, as they expose the stated values and where they are supported in this context. The speeches use figures of amplification and other reasoning which establish the usual and familiar arguments between the speaker and the audience in this document. The belief in the possibility of modifying values in conjunction to the representation of determined and determinable schooling journey are the premises for the development of the arguments that justify the PNE goals.Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar los materiales discursivos del Cuaderno Digital “Conociendo las 20 metas del PNE”, que presenta el Plan Nacional de Educacion (PNE) sancionado en 2014. Este Plan establece legalmente las metas para el proximo decenio relativas a la educacion escolar. El Cuaderno Digital explicita los acuerdos sobre lo que la sociedad brasileña desea para la escolarizacion. La metodologia utilizada es el analisis retorico a partir del sesgo de la Teoria de la Argumentacion propuesta por la Nueva Retorica, que permite examinar las tecnicas argumentativas y los razonamientos de mayor adherencia a las acciones educativas establecidas, al exponer los valores declarados y en donde se apoyan en este contexto. Los discursos recurren a figuras de amplificacion y otros razonamientos constitutivos de los argumentos habituales y familiares entre el orador y el auditorio en el presente documento. La creencia en la posibilidad de modificar los valores junto a la representacion de una escolarizacion determinada y determinable son las premisas para el desarrollo de los argumentos que justifican las metas del PNE.Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar os materiais discursivos do Caderno Digital “Conhecendo as 20 metas do PNE”, que apresenta o Plano Nacional de Educação (PNE) sancionado em 2014. Este Plano estabelece legalmente as metas para a proxima decada com relação à educação escolar. O Caderno Digital explicita os acordos acerca do que se diz preferivel para a escolarização pela sociedade brasileira. Como metodologia utiliza-se a analise retorica pelo vies da Teoria da Argumentação, como proposto pela Nova Retorica, o que permite examinar as tecnicas argumentativas e os raciocinios de maior adesao para as acoes educativas estabelecidas, ao expor os valores afirmados e onde se sustentam neste contexto. Os discursos recorrem às figuras de amplificação e a outros raciocinios que instituem os argumentos usuais e familiares entre orador e auditorio neste documento. A crenca na possibilidade de modificar valores em conjuncao à representação de percurso escolar determinado e determinavel constituem as premissas para o desenvolvimento dos argumentos que justificam as metas do PNE.Fundação CesgranrioAlvarenga, Claudia Helena AzevedoMazzotti, Tarso Bonilha2017-02-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/38810.1590/s0104-40362017000100007Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 25, n. 94 (2017): Revista Ensaio Jan./Mar.; 182-2061809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2porengspahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388/630https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388/631https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388/632https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/downloadSuppFile/388/30https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/downloadSuppFile/388/31AmericasDireitos autorais 2017 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-02-20T20:17:26Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/388Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2017-02-20T20:17:26Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present Analisis de los argumentos que presentan las 20 metas del plan nacional de educacion Analise dos argumentos que apresentam as 20 metas do Plano Nacional de Educação |
title |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present Alvarenga, Claudia Helena Azevedo Educational policies; Educational legislation; Argumentation Politicas educativas; Legislacion educativa; Argumentacion Educação Politicas educacionais; Legislação educacional; Argumentação |
title_short |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present |
title_full |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present |
title_sort |
Analysis of the arguments that the 20 goals of the national education plan present |
author |
Alvarenga, Claudia Helena Azevedo |
author_facet |
Alvarenga, Claudia Helena Azevedo Mazzotti, Tarso Bonilha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mazzotti, Tarso Bonilha |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alvarenga, Claudia Helena Azevedo Mazzotti, Tarso Bonilha |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educational policies; Educational legislation; Argumentation Politicas educativas; Legislacion educativa; Argumentacion Educação Politicas educacionais; Legislação educacional; Argumentação |
topic |
Educational policies; Educational legislation; Argumentation Politicas educativas; Legislacion educativa; Argumentacion Educação Politicas educacionais; Legislação educacional; Argumentação |
description |
This article aims to analyze the discursive materials of the Digital Notebook “Knowing the 20 goals of the PNE” which features the National Education Plan (PNE) sanctioned in 2014. This Plan legally establishes the goals for the next decade with respect to education. The Digital Notebook makes explicit the agreements on what is said to be preferable for educating according to Brazilian society. The rhetorical analysis by the bias of Argumentation Theory, as proposed by New Rhetoric, is used as methodology and allows examining the argumentative techniques and the reasoning of greater adherence to the established educational actions, as they expose the stated values and where they are supported in this context. The speeches use figures of amplification and other reasoning which establish the usual and familiar arguments between the speaker and the audience in this document. The belief in the possibility of modifying values in conjunction to the representation of determined and determinable schooling journey are the premises for the development of the arguments that justify the PNE goals. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388 10.1590/s0104-40362017000100007 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/s0104-40362017000100007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng spa |
language |
por eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388/630 https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388/631 https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/388/632 https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/downloadSuppFile/388/30 https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/downloadSuppFile/388/31 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Americas |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 25, n. 94 (2017): Revista Ensaio Jan./Mar.; 182-206 1809-4465 0104-4036 reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO-2 |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
institution |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
reponame_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754832031233081344 |